In order to reduce test anxiety and to encourage the learning of course material, students were given the opportunity to offset a poor lecture examination grade by taking a second, equivalent exam. The repeat exam provided immediate reward for using the initial exam as a study guide. Students who took two or three repeat exams had higher final examination grades than those who took fewer repeats. The repeat exam procedure was well received by all students, helped weaker students to keep up with the course, and was convenient for the instructor to implement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DavidsonW. B.HouseW. J.BoydT. L. (1984). A test-retest policy for introductory psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 11, 182–184.
2.
FoleyD. P. (1981). Instructional potential of teacher-made tests. Teaching of Psychology, 8, 243–244.
3.
FriedmanH. (1972). Introduction to statistics.New York: Random House.
4.
FriedmanH. (1982). Simplified determinations of statistical power, magnitude of effect and research sample sizes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 521–526.
5.
KellerF. S. (1968). “Good-bye, teacher …”Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 79–89.
6.
KottkeJ. L. (1985). Using a comprehensive makeup exam to replace a missed exam. Teaching of Psychology, 12, 51–52.
7.
WardE. F. (1984). Statistics mastery: A novel approach. Teaching of Psychology, 11, 223–225.
