AikenE. G.LauA. W.Response prompting and response confirmation: A review of recent literature. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 68, 330–341.
2.
BourneL. E.ParkerB. K.Differences among modes for portraying stimulus information in concept identification. Psychonomic Science, 1964, 1, 209–210.
3.
HallK. A.BormanK. G.Prompting and confirmation as instructional strategies with computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 1973, 65, 279–285.
4.
KlausmeierH. J.GhatalaE. S.FrayerD. A.Conceptual learning and development: A cognitive view. New York: Academic Press, 1974.
5.
KulhavyR. W.Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 1977, 47, 211–232.
MillerL. K.Principles of everyday behavior analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1975.
9.
MillerL. K.WeaverF. H.A behavioral technology for producing concept formation in university students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1976, 9, 289–300.
10.
O'DayE. F.Programmed instruction: Techniques and trends. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.
11.
SkinnerB. F.The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 1954, 24, 86–97.
SkinnerB. F.Why we need teaching machines. Harvard Educational Review, 1961, 31, 377–398.
14.
SkinnerB. F.The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1968.
15.
StolurowL. M.LippertH. T.Prompting, confirmation, and overlearning in the automated teaching of a sight vocabulary. In DeCeccoJ. P. (Ed.), Educational technology.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964.
16.
TennysonR. D.ParkO.The teaching of concepts: A review of the instructional design literature. Review of Educational Research, 1980, 50, 55–70.
17.
TennysonR. D.SteveM. W.BoutwellR. E.Instance sequence and analysis of instance attribute representation in concept acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975, 67, 821–827.
