Department practice in administering the subject pool has been changing, but the educational value is still in doubt.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association. Ad hoc committee on ethical standards in psychological research. Ethical principles in the conduct of research with human participants.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1973.
2.
BrittonB. K.Ethical and educational aspects of participating as a subject in psychology experimentsTeaching of Psychology, 1979, 6, 195–198.
3.
CookS. W.KimbleG. A.HicksL. H.McGuireW. J.SchoggenP. H.SmithM. B.Ethical standards for psychological research. APA Monitor, 1971, 2(7), 9–29.
4.
DavisJ. R.FernaldP. S.Psychology in action; Laboratory experience versus subject pool. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 523–524.
5.
EndlerN. S.RushtonJ. P.RoedigerH. L.Productivity and scholarly impact (citations) of British, Canadian, and U.S. departments of psychology. American Psychologist. 1978, 33, 1064–1082.
6.
HolmesD. S.Amount of experience in experiments as a determinant of performance in later experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 7, 403–407.
7.
JungJ.Current practices and problems in the use of college students for psychological research. The Canadian Psychologist, 1969, 10(3), 280–290.
8.
PageM. M.Modification of figure-ground perception as a function of awareness of demand characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9, 59–66.
9.
PageM. M.Social psychology of a classical conditioning of attitudes experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 11, 177–186.
10.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L.The volunteer subject. In RosenthalRosnow (Eds.), Artifact in Behavior Research. New York: Academic Press, 1969.
11.
SilvermanI.ShulmanD.WiesenthalD. L.Effects of deceiving and debriefing psychological subjects on performance in later experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 14, 203–212.
