Faculty and students agree on the value of communication skills, but they differ on the value of intellectual and practical outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BockF. A.Student expectations of course content affect faculty evaluations in an Abnormal Psychology class. Teaching of Psychology, 1979, 6, 167–168.
2.
DoyleK. O.WhitelyS. E.Student ratings as criteria for effective teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 1974, 11, 259–274.
3.
FeldmanK. A.The superior college teacher from the student's view. Research in Higher Education, 1976, 5, 243–288.
4.
GrazinK. L.PainterJ. J.A new explanation for students' course evaluation tendencies. American Educational Research Journal, 1973, 67, 451–460.
5.
GrashaA. F.The role of internal instructor frames of reference in the student rating process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975, 67, 451–460.
6.
HaslettB. J.Student knowledgeability, student sex, class size, and class level: Their interactions and influences on student ratings of instruction. Research in Higher Education, 1973, 44, 487–495.
7.
LeventhalL.AbramiP. C.PerryR. P.Do teacher rating forms reveal as much about students as about teachers?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, 68, 411–445.
8.
MarquesT. E.LaneD. F.DorfmanP. W.Toward the development of a system for instructional evaluation: Is there consensus regarding what constitutes effective teaching?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1979, 71, 840–849.
9.
ReynoldsD. V.Students who haven't seen a film on sexuality and communication prefer it to a lecture on the history of Psychology they haven't heard: Some implications for the university. Teaching of Psychology, 1977, 4, 82–83.
