From a meta-analysis approach and examination of 312 available reports, these authors derive generalizations for achievement and acceptability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BiglanA.The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 58, 195–203.
2.
BlockJ. H.BurnsR. B.Mastery learning. In ShulmanL. S. (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 4). Itasca, IL. Peacock, 1976.
3.
BrachtG. H.GlassG. V.The external validity of experiments. American Educational Research Journal, 1968, 5, 437–474.
4.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In GageN. L. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching.Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1963.
5.
Carnegie Commission on Higher Education.The fourth revolution: Instructional technology and higher education.New York: McGraw Hill, 1972.
6.
Carnegie Commission on Higher Education.A classification of institutions of higher education (Rev. ed.). Berkeley, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1976.
7.
CohenJStatistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press, 1977.
8.
CrossK. P.Accent on learning.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1976.
9.
GilbertJ. P.McPeekB.MostellerF.Statistics and ethics in surgery and anesthesia. Science, 1977, 198, 684–689.
10.
GlassG. V.Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 1976, 5, 3–8.
11.
GlassG. V.SmithM. L.Meta-analysis of research on class size and achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979, 1, 2–16.
12.
HurshD. E.Personalized systems of instruction: What do the data indicate?. Journal of Personalized Instruction, 1976, 1, 91–105.
13.
JohnsonK. R.RuskinR. S.Behavioral instruction: An evaluative review.Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 1977.
14.
KellerF. S.“Good-bye teacher…”Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968, 1, 79–89.
15.
KulikJ. A.CohenP. A.EbelingB. J.Effectiveness of programmed instruction in higher education: A meta-analysis of findings. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, in press.
16.
KulikJ. A.JaksaP.KulikC.-L. C.Research on component features of Keller's personalized system of instruction. Journal of Personalized Instruction, 1978, 3, 2–14.
17.
KulikJ. A.KulikC.-L. C.CohenP. A.A meta-analysis of outcome studies of Keller's personalized system of instruction. American Psychologist, 1979, 34, 307–318. (a).
18.
KulikJ. A.KulikC.-L. C.CohenP. A.Research on audiotutorial instruction: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Research in Higher Education, 1979, 11, 321–341. (b).
19.
KulikJ. A.KulikC.-L. C.CohenP. A.Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching: A meta-analysis of findings. Review of Educational Research, in press.
20.
KulikJ. A.KulikC.-L. C.SmithB. B.Research on the personalized system of instruction. Journal of Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 1976, 13, 23–30.
21.
McGawB.GlassG. V.Choice of the metric for effect size in meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, in press.
PresseyS. L.A third and fourth contribution toward the coming “industrial revolution” in education. School and Society, 1932, 36, 668–672.
24.
RobinA. R.Behavioral instruction in the college classroom. Review of Educational Research, 1976, 46, 313–354.
25.
RyanB. A.Keller's personalized system of instruction: An appraisal.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1974.
26.
SilbermanH. F.Characteristics of some more recent studies of instructional methods. In CoulsonJ. E. (Ed.), Programmed learning and computer-based instruction.New York: Wiley, 1962.
27.
SmithM. L.GlassG. V.Meta-analysis of psycho-therapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 752–760.
28.
SuppesP.The uses of computers in education. Scientific American, 1966, 215(3), 207–220.
29.
TaveggiaT. C.Personalized instruction: A summary of comparative research, 1967–1974. American Journal of Physics, 1976, 44, 1028–1033.
