This study presents a unique approach to teacher evaluation and features interrelations among performance and other behavior measures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CohenA. M.BrawerF. B.Measuring faculty performance.Washington, DC: American Association of Junior Colleges, 1969.
2.
DoyleK. O.Student evaluation of instruction.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1975.
3.
HuchinsonS.ArkoffA.WeaverH. B.Ethnic and sex factors in classroom responsiveness. Journal of Social Psychology, 1966, 69, 321–325.
4.
KulikJ. A.KulikC. C.Student ratings of instruction. Teaching of Psychology, 1974, 1, 51–57.
5.
LeventhalL.Teacher rating forms: Critique and reformulation of previous validation designs. Canadian Psychological Review, 1975, 16, 269–276.
6.
LeventhalL.AbramiP. C.PerryR. P.Do teacher rating forms reveal as much about students as about teachers?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, 68, 441–445.
7.
McClellandJ. N.The effect of student evaluations of college instruction upon subsequent evaluations. California Journal of Educational Research, 1970, 21, 88–95.
8.
McKeachieW. J.LinY.MannW.Student ratings of teacher effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 1971, 8, 435–445.
9.
ReynoldsD. V.Students who haven't seen a film on sexuality and communication prefer it to a lecture on the History of Psychology they haven't heard: Some implications for the University. Teaching of Psychology, 1977, 4, 82–83.
10.
RodinM.Rating the teachers. The Center Magazine, 1976, 9, 55–60.
11.
RodinM.RodinB.Student evaluations of teachers. Science, 1972, 177, 1164–1166.
