A unique foundation for curriculum design is proposed to curb course proliferation, encourage flexible thinking, and to rekindle enthusiasm.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoyerE. L.KaplanM.Educating for survival.New Rochelle, NY: Change Magazine Press, 1977.
2.
GibsonW.The knowledge of human minds: When did education come to mean recitation of facts and static information?The Chronicle of Higher Education, April 17, 1978, p. 48.
3.
KingA. R.BrownellJ. A.The curriculum and the disciplines and knowledge: A theory of curriculum practice.New York: Wiley, 1966.
4.
KuhnT.The structure of scientific revolutions.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1964.
5.
LachmanR.LachmanJ. L.ButterfieldE. C.Cognitive psychology and information processing.New York: Erlbaum, 1979.
6.
LuxD. F.DanielR. S.Which courses are most frequently listed by psychology departments?. Teaching of Psychology, 1978, 5, 13–16.
7.
McKeachieW. J.MilhollandJ. E.Undergraduate curricula in psychology, Chicago: Scott Foresman, 1961.
8.
WertheimerM.Humanistic psychology and the human but tough-minded psychologist. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 739–745.
