Two different teacher rating scales appear to be useful and interpretable regardless of the instructional model
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FeldhusenJ.AmesR.LindenK.Designing instruction to achieve higher goals and objectives. Educational Technology, 1974, 14, 21–23.
2.
FeldhusenJ.LindenK.AmesR.Using instructional theory and educational technology in designing college and university courses: A three stage model. Improving College and University Teaching Yearbook 1975. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press, 1975, 64–69.
3.
FreyP. W.Comparative judgment scaling of student course ratings. American Educational Research Journal, 1973, 10, 149–154.
4.
FreyP. W.LeondardD. W.BeattyW. W.Student ratings of instruction: Validation research. American Educational Research Journal, 1975, 12, 435–444.
5.
GrashaA. F.Assessing and developing faculty performance: Principles and models.Cincinnati, OH: Communication and Education Associates, 1977.
KerlingerF. N.Foundations of behavioral research.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.
8.
KulikJ. A.McKeachieW. J.The evaluation of teachers in higher education. In KerlingerF. N. (Ed.), Review of research in education.Itasca, IL: Peacock Publishers, 1975.
9.
NieN. H.HullC. H.JenkinsJ. G.SteinbrennerK.BentD. H.Statistical package for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill, 1975.
10.
PostlethwaitS. N.NovakJ.MurrayH. T.The audio-tutorial approach to learning.Minneapolis: Burgess, 1972.
