Regular reliability checks plus a formal appeal system provide assurance of fairness to students and useful feedback to the instructor.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CarrollJ. G.Assessing the effectiveness of a training program for the university teaching assistant. Teaching of Psychology, 1977, 4, 135–138.
2.
CarterK. R.Student criterion grading: An attempt to reduce some common grading problems. Teaching of Psychology, 1977, 4, 59–62.
3.
KellerF. S.ShermanJ. G.The Keller Plan Handbook.Menlo Park: W. A. Benjamin, 1974.
4.
LindenK. W.AmesR. E.FeldhusenJ. F.Undergraduate assistants as an integral factor in an educational psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 1977, 4, 182–185.
5.
ProsserF.JensenD. D.Computer generated repeatable tests. In Proceedings of the 1971 Spring Joint Computer Conference, 1971, 38, 295–301.
6.
RobinA. L.CookD. A.Training proctors for personalized instruction. Teaching of Psychology, 1978, 5, 9–13.
7.
ShermanJ. G. (Ed.). Personalized system of instruction: 41 germinal papers.Menlo Park: W. A. Benjamin, 1974.
