BarreraM.GlasgowR. E.Design and evaluation of a personalized instruction course in behavioral self-control. Teaching of Psychology, 1976, 3, 81–84.
2.
BornD. G.GledhillS. M.DavisM. L.Examination performance in lecture-discussion and personalized instruction courses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972, 5, 33–43.
3.
BornD. G.WhelanP.Some descriptive characteristics of student performance in PSI and lecture courses. Psychological Record, 1973, 23, 145–152.
4.
BostowD. E.BlumenfeldG. J.The effects of two test-retest procedures on the classroom performance of undergraduate college students. In SembG. (Ed.), Behavior analysis and education—1972. Lawrence, KS: Human Development, University of Kansas, 1972.
5.
BostowD. E.O'ConnorR. J.A comparison of two college classroom testing procedures: Required remediation versus no remediation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1973, 6, 599–607.
6.
CroftR. G. F.JohnsonW. G.BergerJ.ZlotlowS. F.The influence of monitoring on PSI performance. Journal of Personalized Instruction, 1976, 1, 28–31.
7.
CrossM. Z.SembG.An analysis of the effects of personalized instruction on students at different initial performance levels in an introductory college nutrition course. Journal of Personalized Instruction, 1976, 1, 47–50.
8.
GlickD. M.If there is a pacing problem in PSI, will we recognize it when we see it?Journal of Personalized Instruction, in press.
9.
GlickD. M.SembG.Effects of pacing contingencies in personalized instruction: A review of the evidence. Journal of Personalized Instruction, 1978, 3, 36–42.
10.
GlickD. M.SembG.Instructor-set pacing contingencies versus the absence of such contingencies in a personalized university course. Journal of Personalized Instruction, in press.
11.
HenneberryJ. K.Initial progress rates as related to performance in a personalized system of instruction. Teaching of Psychology, 1976, 3, 178–181. (a).
12.
HenneberryJ. K.Latency and grade point average as predictors of student pace and performance. In FraleyL. E.VargasE. A. (Eds.), Behavior research and technology in higher education. Gainesville, FL: Society for Behavioral Technology and Engineering, University of Florida, 1976. Pp. 67–73. (b).
13.
HoberockL. L.KoenB. V.RothC. H.WagnerG. R.Theory of PSI evaluated for engineering education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 1972, 15, 25–29.
14.
KellerF. S.“Good-bye teacher….”Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968, 1, 79–89.
15.
LazarR.SoaresC.TermanM.The interquiz interval: A measure of student self-pacing. Journal of Personalized Instruction, 1977, 2, 25–27.
16.
LloydK. E.KnutzenN. J.A self-paced programmed undergraduate course in the experimental analysis of behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969, 2, 125–133.
17.
McMichaelJ. S.CoreyJ. R.Contingency management in an introductory psychology course produces better learning. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969, 2, 79–83.
18.
MillerL. K.WeaverF. J.SembG.A procedure for maintaining student progress in a personalized university course. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974, 7, 87–91.
19.
MyersW. A.Operant learning principles applied to teaching introductory statistics. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1970, 3, 213–220.
20.
PhillipsT. W.SembG.Some effects of prequiz lectures, post-quiz lectures and a remediation procedure in a contingency-managed university course. In FraleyL. E.VargasE. A. (Eds.), Behavior research and technology in higher education. Gainesville, FL: Department of Psychology, University of Florida, 1976. Pp. 24–32.
21.
PowersR. B.EdwardsK. A.Performance in a self-paced course. Journal of Experimental Education, 1974, 42, 60–64.
22.
PowersR. B.EdwardsK. A.HoehleW. F.Bonus points in a self-paced course facilitates exam taking. Psychological Record, 1973, 23, 533–538.
23.
RobinA. L.GrahamM. Q.Academic responses and attitudes engendered by teacher pacing versus student pacing in a personalized instruction course. In RuskinR. S.BonoS. F. (Eds.), Personalized instruction in higher education: Proceedings of the First National Conference. Washington, D.C.: Center for Personalized Instruction, 1974. Pp. 81–90.
24.
SchwartzG. E.What is doing the teaching in PSI courses. In FraleyL. E.VargasE. A. (Eds.), Behavior research and technology in higher education. Gainesville, FL: Society for Behavioral Technology and Engineering, University of Florida, 1976. Pp. 35–40.
25.
SembG.ConyersD.SpencerR.Sanchez-SosaJ. J.An experimental comparison of four pacing contingencies. In JohnstonJ. M. (Ed.), Behavior research and technology in higher education. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1975. Pp. 348–368.
26.
SembG.GlickD. M.SpencerR. E.Programatic research: An analysis of student withdrawals in behavioral systems of instruction. In FraleyL. F. (Ed.), Behavioral systems in higher education, in press.
27.
SheppardW. C.MacDermotH. G.Design and evaluation of a programmed course in introductory psychology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1970, 3, 5–11.
28.
SuttererJ. R.HollowayR. E.An analysis of student behavior with and without limiting contingencies. In JohnstonJ. M. (Ed.), Behavior research and technology in higher education. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1975. Pp. 303–329.