First impressions on objective tests are not necessarily best, but the preferred strategy is to be careful.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DavisR. E.Changing examination answers: An educational myth?. Journal of Medical Education, 1975, 50, 685–687.
2.
EdwardsK. A.An analysis of oral and written quizzes as teaching techniques. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utah State University, 1976.
3.
FergusonG. A.Statistical analysis in psychology and education (4th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.
4.
JohnstonJ. J.Sticking with first responses on multiple-choice exams: For better or for worse?. Teaching of Psychology, 1975, 2, 178–179.
5.
LoweM. L.CrawfordC. C.First impression versus second thought in true-false tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1929, 20, 192–195.
6.
MathewsC. O.Erroneous first impressions on objective tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1929, 20, 280–286.
7.
ReileP. J.BriggsL. J.Should students change their initial answers on objective-type tests? More evidence regarding an old problem. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1952, 43, 110–115.
8.
ReilingE.TaylorR.A new approach to the problem of changing initial responses to multiple choice questions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1972, 9, 67–70.
9.
SiegelS.Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.