Classes which perform better rate their teachers higher even when a “trade-off” is avoided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AleamoniL. M.A review of recent reliability and validity studies on the Illinois Course Evaluation Questionnaire (CEQ) (Research Memorandum #127). Urbana, IL: Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, University of Illinois, 1972.
2.
AleamoniL. M.The evaluation of instruction and the use of CEQ Form 73 (Research Memorandum No. 152). Urbana, IL: Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, University of Illinois, 1974.
3.
CostinF.GreenoughW. T.MengesR. J.Student ratings of college teaching: Reliability, validity and usefulness. Review of Educational Research, 1971, 41, 511–535.
4.
DwyerF. M.Selected criteria for evaluating teacher effectiveness. Improving College and University Teaching, 1973, 21, 51–52.
5.
FreyP. W.Student ratings of teachers: Validity of several rating factors. Science, 1973, 182, 83–85.
6.
KulikJ. A.McKeachieW. J.The evaluation of teachers in higher education. In KerlingerF. N. (Ed.). Review of Research in Education (Vol. 3). Itasca, IL: Peacock, 1976.
7.
McKeachieW. J.LinY.MannW.Student ratings of teacher effectiveness: Validity studies. American Educational Research Journal, 1971, 8, 435–445.
8.
MorshJ. E.BurgessG. G.SmithP. N.Student achievement as a measure of instructor effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1956, 47, 79–88.
9.
RodinM.RodinB.Student evaluations of teachers. Science, 1972, 177, 1164–1166.
10.
SolomonD.RosenbergL.BezdekW. E.Teacher behavior and student learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1964, 55, 23–30.
11.
SpencerR. E.DickW.Course evaluation questionnaire: Manual of interpretation. Research Report No. 200. Urbana, Illinois: Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, University of Illinois, 1965.
