Three components of instruction and withdrawal rates are compared after teaching the same course in two different formats.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BornD. G.HerbertE. W.A further study of personalized instruction for students in large university lectures. Journal of Experimental Education, 1971, 40, 6–11.
2.
FersterC. B.Individualized instruction in a large introductory psychology college course. Psychological Record, 1968, 18, 521–532.
3.
KellerF. S.A personal course in psychology. In UlrichR.StachnikT.MarbryJ. (Eds.). Control of human behavior. Glenview, Illinois: Scott Foresman, 1966, 91–93.
McMichaelJ. S.CoreyJ. R.Contingency management in an introductory psychology course produces better learning. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969, 2, 79–83.
6.
MischelW.Introduction to personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971.
7.
MorrisC. J.KimbrellG. McA.Performance and attitudinal effects of the Keller method in an introductory psychology course. Psychological Record, 1972, 22, 523–530.
8.
PhilippasM. A.SommerfeldtR. W.Keller vs. lecture method in general physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 1972, 40, 1300–1306.
9.
SheppardW. C.MacDermotH. G.Design and evaluation of a programmed course in introductory psychology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1970, 3, 5–11.
10.
SiegelS.Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw Hill, 1956.