Abstraction and generalization constitute important aims of science (Kruglanski, 2001, in press), yet broad theorizing is rather rare in social and personality psychology. Some reasons for this state of affairs are examined, including the considerable staying power of insufficiently abstract theories and the broad resistance that abstract theories can incite. The trials and tribulations of abstract theorizing are considered, drawing on my own work on lay epistemics. Its problems and pitfalls notwithstanding, abstract theorizing is what our field needs more of if progress is to take place and social and personality psychology is to obtain the voice it merits in the general cultural dialogue about societal issues. To encourage such theorizing, 3 principles are offered, including the commonality focus (the horizontal voyage), the data focus (the vertical voyage), and the restructuration focus (the upstream voyage) principles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Stull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2.
Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought.(pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford.
3.
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.
4.
Chun, W. Y., Spiegel, S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). Assimilative behavior identification can also be resource-dependent. A unimodel-based analysis of dispositional attribution phases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 542-555.
5.
Cooper, J. (1990). To lose the ostrich. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 205-206.
6.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
7.
Erb, H.-P., Kruglanski, A. W., Chun, W. Y., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & Spiegel, S. (in press). Searching for commonalities in human judgment: The parametric unimodel and its dual process alternatives. The European Review of Social Psychology.
8.
Erb, H.-P., Pierro, A., Manetti, L., Spiegel, S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2003). Persuasion according to the unimodel. Unpublished manuscript, University of Maryland.
9.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic.
12.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychological of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
13.
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
14.
Hume, D. (1956). Philosophical essays concerning human understanding. Chicago: Regnery.
15.
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-260). New York: Academic.
16.
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 192-238). Omaha: University of Nebraska Press.
17.
Kelley, H. H. (1989). Foreward. In A. W. Kruglanski, Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases (pp. vii-ix). New York: Plenum.
18.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1975). The endogenous-exogenous partition in attribution theory. Psychological Review, 82, 387-406.
19.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1980). Lay epistemo-logic: Process and contents. Psychological Review, 87, 70-87.
20.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemic and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum.
21.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1991, August). Motivation and social cognition: Enemies or a love story? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
22.
Kruglanski, A. W. (2001). That “vision thing”: The state of theory in personality and social psychology at the edge of the new millennium. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 871-875.
23.
Kruglanski, A. W. (in press). Theories as bridges. In P. van Lange (Ed.), Bridging social psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24.
Kruglanski, A. W., Chun, W. Y., Erb, H. P., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & Spiegel, S. (2003). A parametric unimodel of human judgment: Integrating dual-process frameworks in social cognition from s single-mode perspective. In. J. Forgas, B. von Hippel, & K. Williams (Eds.), Motivational affective and cognitive processes of human judgment (pp. 137-161). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1999a). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 83-109.
26.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1999b).The illusory second mode or, the cue is the message. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 182-193.
27.
Lawrence, D. H., & Festinger, L. (1962). Deterrents and reinforcement: The psychology of insufficient reward. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28.
Mill, J. S. (1950). Philosophy of scientific method. New York: Hafner.
29.
Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209-239). New York: Academic.
30.
Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472-489.
31.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). San Diego, CA: Academic.
32.
Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2004). Relevance override: On the reduced impact of “cues” under high motivation conditions of persuasion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 251-264.
33.
Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. New York: Harper.
34.
Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (1999). Associative and rule-based processing: A connectionist interpretation of dual-process models. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.). Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 323-338). New York: Guilford.
35.
Trope, Y., & Alfieri, T. (1997). Effortfulness and flexibility of dispositional judgment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 662-674.
36.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1130.
37.
Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129-140.
