Theory-making can be taught and learned. New theories aim to fill a gap in existing explanations. Although mathematical statements are privileged elsewhere, social psychology–s impactful theories tend to be verbal, perhaps because of the arbitrary scales of our variables. Good theories posit causal relations, attempt coherence, form a good narrative, aim for parsimony, are testable, prove fertile, and solve problems. Theories' sources can be intellectual, personal, group, or worldview. As long as the theory is stated logically, any source can be heuristic.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
2.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1973). Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 41-57.
3.
Anderson, N. H. (1974). Information integration: A brief survey. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (pp. 236-305). San Francisco: Freeman.
4.
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 1230-1240.
5.
Berscheid, E. (1992). A glance back at a quarter century of social psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 525-533.
6.
Bruner, J. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
7.
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.
8.
Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 504-553). New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Darley, J. M., & Batson, C. D. (1973). “From Jerusalem to Jericho”: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 100-108.
10.
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
11.
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (1981). Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 1-20.
12.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
13.
Fiske, D. W. (1986). Specificity of method and knowledge in social science. In D. W. Fiske & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Metatheory in social science: Pluralisms and subjectivities (pp. 61-82). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Fiske, S. T. (1993). Social cognition and social perception. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 155-194). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
15.
Fiske, S. T. (2000). Interdependence reduces prejudice and stereotyping. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 115-135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16.
Fiske, S. T. (2001). Social psychology, theories of. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 21, pp. 14413-14421). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
17.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
18.
Fiske, S. T., Lin, M. H., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 231-254). New York: Guilford.
19.
Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influence of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic.
20.
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 189-212). New York: Springer-Verlag.
21.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
22.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
24.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. Oxford, England: Harpers.
25.
Morling, B., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). Defining and measuring harmony control. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 379-414.
26.
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
27.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
28.
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
29.
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
30.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
31.
Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34-52.
32.
Zajonc, R. B. (1994). Emotional expression and temperature modulation. In S. H. M. van Goozen & N. E. Van de Poll (Eds.), Emotions: Essays on emotion theory (pp. 3-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
