The value of a metatheoretical perspective is illustrated using our work in the development of the social identity approach. A metatheory places specific research questions within a broader framework and encourages the integration of theorizing for a range of potentially disparate phenomena. It sets parameters for predictions by specific theories and contexts. Resistance to ideas and disputes among theorists often reflect differences in metatheories. However, openness to debate and integration of concepts can turn these to advantage by posing new research questions. These issues are discussed with reference to European and North American perspectives on groups; theorizing about intergroup behavior, motivation, and self-categorization; the connection between laboratory and real-world phenomena; and the linkage of intergroup and intragroup behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, D. (1985). Focus of attention in minimal intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 65-74.
2.
Abrams, D. (1989). Differential association: Social developments in gender identity and intergroup relations during adolescence. In S. Skevington & D. Baker (Eds.), The social identity of women (pp. 59-83). London: Sage.
3.
Abrams, D. (1990). How do group members regulate their behavior? An integration of social identity and self-awareness theories. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 89-112). New York: Springer-Verlag.
4.
Abrams, D. (1992). Processes of social identification. In G. Breakwell (Ed.), Social psychology of identity and the self-concept (pp. 57-99). San Diego: Academic.
5.
Abrams, D. (1994). Social self-regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 273-283.
6.
Abrams, D. (2004). The development of social identity: What develops? In M. Bennett & F. Sani (Eds.), The development of the social self (pp. 291-312). New York: Psychology Press.
7.
Abrams, D. & Hogg, M. A. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317-334.
8.
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (Eds.). (1990). Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. New York: Springer-Verlag.
9.
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (Eds.). (1999). Social identity and social cognition. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
10.
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2001). Collective identity: Group membership and self-conception. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale, (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 425-460). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
11.
Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N. J., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906-912.
12.
Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who your are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.
13.
Allport, F H. (1924). Social psychology. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.
14.
Billig, M. (1976). Social psychology and intergroup relations. London: Academic.
15.
Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Doosje, B. (2002). Intragroup and intergroup evaluation effects on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 744-753.
16.
XBrewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this we? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
17.
Brown, R. J., Condor, S., Mathews, A., Wade, G., & Williams, J. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273-286.
18.
Condor, S. G. (1986). Sex role beliefs and “traditional” women: Feminist and intergroup perspectives. In S. Wilkinson (Ed.), Feminist social psychology (pp.97-118). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
19.
Deaux, K. (1992). Personalizing identity and socializing the self. In G. Breakwell (Ed.), Social psychology of identity and the self-concept (pp. 9-34). San Diego: Academic.
20.
Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27-57.
21.
Farr, R. M. (1996). The roots of modern social psychology: 1872-1954. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
22.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
23.
Haslam, A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.
24.
Hinkle, S., & Brown, R. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48-70). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
25.
Hogg, M. A. (1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 85-111.
26.
Hogg, M. A. (1996). Intragroup processes, group structure and social identity. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 65-93). Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann.
27.
Hogg, M. A. (2000a). Social identity and social comparison. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 401-421). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
28.
Hogg, M. A. (2000b). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 223-255.
29.
Hogg, M. A. (2003). Social identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 462-479). New York: Guilford.
30.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
31.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1990). Social motivation, self-esteem and social identity. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 28-47). New York: Springer-Verlag.
32.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (Eds.). (1993a). Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives. New York: Prentice Hall.
33.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1993b). Towards a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 173-190). New York: Prentice Hall.
34.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (2001). Intergroup relations: An overview. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Intergroup relations: Essential readings (pp. 1-14). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
35.
Hogg, M. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 1-52). San Diego: Academic.
36.
Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143-156.
37.
Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.
38.
Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., Páez, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2001). Social categorization, social identification, and rejection of deviant group members. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 400-424). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
39.
Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., Páez, D., & Martinez-Taboada, C. (1998). The role of categorization and ingroup norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976-988.
40.
Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse: Son image et son public [Psychoanalysis: Its image and its public}. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
41.
Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic.
42.
Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174.
43.
Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
44.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
45.
Reicher, S. D. (1984). The St. Pauls' riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 1-21.
46.
Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161-198.
47.
Reid, S. A., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). Uncertainty reduction, self-enhancement and social identification. Manuscript submitted for publication.
48.
Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (1998). Social identity theory's self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 40-62.
49.
Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79-97.
50.
Tajfel, H. (1974). Intergroup behaviour, social comparison and social change. Unpublished manuscript. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
51.
Tafjel, H. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic.
52.
Tafjel, H., & Fraser, C. (Eds.). (1978). Introduction to social psychology. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
53.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
54.
Taylor, D. M., & Brown, R. J. (1979). Towards a more social social psychology. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18,173-179.
55.
Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776-793.
56.
Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behaviour. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 77-122). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
57.
Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity (pp. 6-34). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
58.
Turner, J. C, Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
59.
Williams, J. A., & Giles, H. (1978). The changing status of women in society: An intergroup perspective. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 431-446). London: Academic.
60.
Wright, S. C., Aron, A., & Tropp, L. R. (2002). Including others (and groups) in the self: Self-expansion and intergroup relations. In J. P. Forgas & K. D. Williams (Eds.), The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal, and intergroup perspectives (pp. 343-363). New York: Psychology Press.
