The phenomena social psychology seeks to explain–how people think, feel, and act in response to social situations–are rich and diverse. Therefore, explanatory power, the simplicity of a model relative to its empirical scope, is an important desideratum for social psychological theories. A model achieves high explanatory power to the extent that it integrates narrower models within a unified conceptualization, reconciles conflicting findings, and makes novel predictions regarding specific phenomena. This article first relates explanatory power to the various facets of scientific inquiry (modeling, derivation, observation, evaluation, and decision) and then discusses this criterion as a guide for 2 theory-based lines of research my colleagues and I have conducted in the area of social judgment and decision making.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ainslie, G., & Haslam, N. (1992). Hyperbolic discounting. In G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 57-92). New York: Russell Sage.
2.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 261-277.
3.
Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289.
4.
Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual-process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5.
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
6.
Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 204-243). New York: Guilford.
7.
Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influence of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp.1-74). New York: Academic.
8.
Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38.
9.
Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733-740.
10.
Green, L., Meyerson, J., & McFadden, E. (1997). Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward. Memory and Cognition, 25, 715-723.
11.
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford.
12.
Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C., Brown, J., & Jasecho, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences on the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 326-228.
13.
Johnson, M. K. (1997). Identifying the origin of mental experience. In M. S. Myslobodsky (Ed.), The mythomanias: The nature of deception and self-deception (pp. 133-180). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14.
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 220-266). New York: Academic.
15.
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 15, 192-238.
16.
Kirby, K. N., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1995). Preference reversals due to myopic discounting of delayed reward. Psychological Science, 6, 83-89.
17.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational basis. New York: Plenum.
18.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480-498.
19.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-195). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper.
21.
Lieberman, M., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D., & Trope, Y. (2002). Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inferences. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 199-249). New York: Academic.
22.
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5-18.
23.
Loewenstein, G. F. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272-292.
24.
Loewenstein, G. F., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies of intertemporal choice: Evidence and interpretation. In G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.), Choice overtime (pp. 119-145). New York: Russell Sage.
25.
Loewenstein, G., Read, D., & Baumeister, R. (2003). Time and decision: Economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice. New York: Russell Sage.
26.
Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267-286.
27.
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3-19.
28.
Miller, N. E. (1944). Experimental studies of conflict. In McV. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders. New York: Ronald.
29.
Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
Nussbaum, S., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Creeping dispositionism: The temporal dynamics of behavior prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 485-497.
31.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: William & Brown.
32.
Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
33.
Rachlin, H. (1995). Self control: Beyond commitment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 109-159.
34.
Ross, M., & Olson, J. M. (1981). An expectancy-attribution model of the effects of placebos. Psychological Review, 88, 408-437.
35.
Schwartz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgment of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523.
36.
Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
37.
Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108-131.
38.
Thaler, R. H. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economic Letters, 8, 201-207.
39.
Trope, Y. (1974). Inferential processes in the forced compliance situation: A Bayesian analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 1-16.
40.
Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93, 239-257.
41.
Trope, Y., & Alfieri, T. (1997). Effortfulness and flexibility of dispositional judgment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 662-674.
42.
Trope, Y., & Fishbach, A. (2000). Counteractive self-control in overcoming temptation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 493-506.
43.
Trope, Y., & Gaunt, R. (1999). A dual-process model of overconfident attributional inferences. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in socialpsychology (pp. 161-178). New York: Guilford.
44.
Trope, Y., & Gaunt, R. (2000). Processing alternative explanations of behavior: Correction or integration?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 344-354.
45.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, A. (1996) Social hypothesis testing: Cognitive and motivational mechanisms. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 239-270). New York: Guilford.
46.
Trope Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 876-889.
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitiation. Science, 149(3681), 269-274.
49.
Zajonc, R. B. (1976). Family configuration and intelligence: Variations in scholastic aptitude scores parallel trends in family size and the spacing of children. Science, 192, 227-236.
50.
Zillman, D., Katcher, A. H., & Milavsky, B. (1972). Excitation transfer from physical exercise to subsequent aggressive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 247-259.
