Analysts of evil and violence express the concern that to explain harmdoing may result in a condoning attitude toward perpetrators. An examination of research relevant to this hypothesis suggests that there are a variety of cognitive and affective processes that may produce a relatively condoning attitude toward perpetrators as a result of explaining their actions. Evidence from 3 exploratory studies supported the exonerating effects of explanations. Participants generating explicit explanations of harmdoing displayed a more condoning attitude toward perpetrators than did those forming impressions of perpetrators without first explaining the acts. Participants reading social-psychological explanations of harmdoing also judged the researcher to be more condoning of perpetrators than those reading dispositional explanations of the same behavior. Implications of these findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, C. A., Anderson, K. B., & Deuser, W. E. (1996). A general framework for the study of affective aggression: Effects of weapons and extreme temperature on accessibility of aggressive thoughts, affect, and attitude. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletinw, 22, 366-376.
2.
Anderson, C. A., Benjamin, A. J., Jr., & Bartholow, B. D. (1998). Does the gun pull the trigger? Automatic priming effects of weapon pictures and weapon names. Psychological Science, 9, 308-314.
3.
Anderson, C. A., & Sechler, E. S. (1986). Effects of explanation and counterexplanation on the development and use of social theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 24-34.
4.
Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. New York: Viking.
5.
Aronson, E. (1995). The social animal (7th ed.). New York: Freeman.
6.
Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1994). Implicit stereotyping and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 55-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7.
Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Evil: Inside human violence and cruelty. New York: Freeman.
8.
Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A., & Wotman, R. R. (1990). Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal conflict: Autobiographical narratives about anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 994-1005.
9.
Berkowitz, L. (1990). On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression: A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis. American Psychologist, 45, 494-503.
10.
Berkowitz, L., & Frodi, A. (1979). Reactions to a child's mistakes as affected by her/his looks and speech. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 420-425.
11.
Bodenhausen, G., Sheppard, L., & Kramer, G. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The different impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 45-62.
12.
Browning, C. R. (1992). Ordinary men: Reserve police battalion 101 and the final solution in Poland. New York: HarperCollins.
13.
Burger, J. M. (1991). Changes in attributions over time: The ephemeral fundamental attribution error. Social Cognition, 9, 181-193.
14.
Buss, A. R. (1978). Causes and reasons in attribution theory: A conceptual critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1311-1321.
15.
Chang, I. (1997). The rape of Nanking: The forgotten Holocaust of World War II. New York: Basic Books.
16.
Colman, A. M. (1991). Crowd psychology of South African murder trials. American Psychologist, 46, 1071-1079.
17.
Crandall, C. S. (1994). Prejudice against fat people: Ideology and self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 882-894.
18.
Croyle, R. T., & Ditto, P. H. (1990). Illness cognition and behavior: An experimental approach. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 13, 31-52.
19.
Darley, J. M. (1992). Social organization for the production of evil. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 199-218.
20.
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
21.
Diener, E., & Wallbom, M. (1976). Effects of self-awareness on antinormative behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 107-111.
22.
Ditto, P. H., & Jemmott, J. B., III. (1989). From rarity to evaluative extremity: Effects of prevalence information on evaluations of positive and negative characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 16-26.
23.
Fischhoff, B. (1982). For those condemned to study the past: Heuristics and biases in hindsight. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 333-351). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Fiske, S. (1987). On the road: Comment on the cognitive stereotyping literature in Pettigrew and Martin. Journal of Social Issues, 43, 113-118.
25.
Forgas, J. P. (1998). On being happy and mistaken: Mood effects on the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 318-331.
26.
Garry, M., Manning, C. G., Loftus, E., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 208-214.
27.
Gilbert, D. T. (1995). Attribution and interpersonal perception. In A. Tesser (Ed.), Advanced social psychology (pp. 99-148). New York: McGraw-Hill.
28.
Gilbert, D. T. & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38.
29.
Goldhagen, D. J. (1996). Hitler's willing executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. New York: Knopf.
30.
Gonzales, M. H., Manning, D. J., & Haugen, J. A. (1992). Explaining our sins: Factors influencing offender accounts and anticipated victim responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 958-971.
31.
Gordon, A. K., & Miller, A. G. (in press). Perspective differences in the construal of lies: Is deception in the eye of the beholder?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
32.
Kelley, H. H. (1992). Common-sense psychology and scientific psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 1-23.
33.
Kelman, H. C., & Hamilton, V. L. (1989). Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
Keltner, D., Ellsworth, P. C., & Edwards, K. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 740-752.
35.
Krull, D. S., & Anderson, C. A. (1997). The process of explanation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 1-5.
36.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
37.
Lerner, J. S., Goldberg, J. H., & Tetlock, P. E. (1998). Sober second thought: The effects of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 563-574.
38.
Lewis, D. O. (1998). Guilty by reason of insanity: A psychiatrist explores the minds of killers. New York: Fawcett Columbine.
39.
Lifton, R. J. (1986). The Nazi doctors: Medical killing and the psychology of genocide. New York: Basic Books.
40.
Linville, P. W. (1982). The complexity-extremity effect and age-based stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 193-211.
41.
Linville, P. W., & Jones, E. E. (1980). Polarized appraisals of outgroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 689-703.
42.
Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., & Preston, E. (1984). Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1231-1243.
43.
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.
44.
Miller, A. G. (1995). Constructions of the obedience experiments: A focus upon domains of relevance. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 33-54.
45.
Miller, A. G., Gillen, B., Schenker, C., & Radlove, S. (1974). The prediction and perception of obedience to authority. Journal of Personality, 42, 23-42.
46.
Miller, N., & Marks, G. (1982). Assumed similarity between self and other: Effect of expectation of future interaction with that other. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 100-105.
47.
Morgenthau, T. (1995, August 7). Condemned to life: After hearing new details about Susan Smith's tangled world, a jury votes against death. Newsweek, 126, 18-23.
48.
Murphy, S. T., Monahan, J. L., & Zajonc, R. B. (1995). Additivity of nonconscious affect: Combined effects of priming and exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 589-602.
49.
Peterson, B. E., Doty, R. M., & Winter, D. G. (1993). Authoritarianism and attitudes toward contemporary social issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 174-184.
50.
Robinson, P. H., & Darley, J. M. (1995). Justice, liability, and blame: Community views and the criminal law. Boulder, CO: Westview.
51.
Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
52.
Salovey, P., & Birnbaum, D. (1989). Influence of mood on health-relevant cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 539-551.
53.
Sereny, G. (1995). Albert Speer: His battle with truth. New York: Knopf.
54.
Sherman, S. J., Zehner, K. S., Johnson, J., & Hirt, E. (1983). Social explanation: The role of timing, set, and recall on subjective likelihood estimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1127-1143.
55.
Snyder, C. R., & Higgins, R. L. (1988). Excuses: Their effective role in the negotiation of reality. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 23-35.
56.
Staub, E. (1989). The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other group violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Stillwell, A. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1997). The construction of victim and perpetrator memories: Accuracy and distortion in role-based accounts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1157-1172.
58.
Sullivan, M. J. L., & Conway, M. (1989). Negative affect leads to low-effort cognition: Attributional processing for observed social behavior. Social Cognition, 7, 315-337.
59.
Tetlock, P. E. (1984). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 227-236.
60.
Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 331-376). New York: Academic Press.
61.
Thomas, C. (1995, April 26). Good and evil are clear now. Cincinnati Enquirer, p. A8-A8.
62.
Toch, H. (1993). Good violence and bad violence: Self-presentations of aggressors through accounts and war stories. In R. B. Felson & J. T. Tedeschi (Eds.), Aggression and violence: Social interactionist perspectives (pp. 193-206). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
63.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
64.
Tyler, T. R., & Sears, D. O. (1977). Coming to like obnoxious people when we must live with them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 200-211.
65.
Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review, 96, 234-254.
66.
Weiner, B. (1993). On sin versus sickness: A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation. American Psychologist, 48, 957-965.
67.
Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.
68.
Weiner, B., Perry, R. P., & Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 738-748.
69.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.
70.
Zillmer, E. A., Harrower, M., Ritzler, B. A., & Archer, R. P. (1995). The quest for the Nazi personality: A psychological investigation of Nazi war criminals. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
71.
Zimbardo, P. G. (1995). The psychology of evil: A situationist perspective on recruiting good people to engage in anti-social acts. Research in Social Psychology, 11, 125-133.
