In this theoretical analysis, we argue that a process referred to as minding is essential for a couple to feel mutually close and satisfied in a close relationship overa long period. Minding represents a package of mutual self-disclosure, other forms of goal-oriented behavior aimed at facilitating the relationship, and attributions about self's and other's motivations, intentions, and effort in the relationship. Self-disclosure and attribution activities in minding are aimed at getting to know the other, trying to understand the other's motivations and deeper dispositions as they pertain to the relationship, and showing respect and acceptance for knowledge gained about other. We link the concept of minding to other major ideas and literatures about how couples achieve closeness: self-disclosure and social penetration, intimacy, empathy and empathic accuracy, and love and self-expansion. We argue that the minding process articulated here has not previously been delineated and that it is a useful composite notion about essential steps in bonding among humans. We also argue that the minding concept stretches our understanding of the interface of attribution and close relationships. We present research possibilities and implications and consider possible alternative positions and counterarguments about the merits of the minding idea for close relationship satisfaction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acitelli, L. K., & Holmberg, D. (1993). Reflecting on relationships: The role of thoughts and memories. In D. Perlman & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Personal relationships (Vol. 4, pp. 71-100). London: Kingsley.
2.
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
3.
Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1986). Love as the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York: Hemisphere.
4.
Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1996). Self and self-expansion in relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher & J. Fitness (Eds.), Knowledge structures in close relationships. A social psychological approach (pp. 325-344). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5.
Baxter, L. A., & Wilmot, W. W. (1985). Taboo topics in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 253-269.
6.
Beck, A. (1988). Love is never enough: How couples can overcome misunderstandings, resolve conflicts, and solve relationship problems through cognitive therapy. New York: Harper & Row.
7.
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1-62). New York: Academic.
8.
Berley, R. A., & Jacobson, N. S. (1984). Causal attributions in intimate relationships: Toward a model of cognitive-behavioral marital therapy. Advances in Cognitive—Behavioral Research and Therapy, 3, 1-35.
9.
Berscheid, E. (1994). Interpersonal relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 79-129.
10.
Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (1989). The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 792-807.
11.
Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples. New York: Simon & Schuster.
12.
Bochner, A. P., Ellis, C., & Tillman, L. M. (1997). Relationships as stories. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed., pp. 307-324). Sussex, England: Wiley.
13.
Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 3-33.
14.
Brehm, S. S. (1992). Intimate relationships. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15.
Bugental, D. B. (1987). Attributions as moderator variables within social interactional systems. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 469-484.
16.
Burleson, B. R. (1995). Personal relationships as a skilled accomplishment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 575-581.
17.
Chelune, G. J., Robinson, J. T., & Kommor, J. J. (1984). A cognitive interactional model of intimate relationships. In V. J. Derlega (Ed.), Communication, intimacy, and close relationships (pp. 11-40). Orlando, FL: Academic.
18.
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
19.
Colwin, L. (1981). The lone pilgrim. New York: Harper & Row.
20.
Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven: Yale University Press.
22.
Fehr, R. (1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 557-579.
23.
Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1992). Attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 613-628.
24.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Social structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
26.
Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (1988). Narrative and the self as relationship. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 17-56). San Diego, CA: Academic.
27.
Gottman, J. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
28.
Gottman, J. (1995). Why marriages succeed or fail. New York: Fireside Books.
29.
Harvey, J. H. (1987). Attributions in close relationships: Research and theoretical developments. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 8-20.
30.
Harvey, J. H., Weber, A. L., & Orbuch, T. L. (1990). Interpersonal accounts: A social psychological perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
31.
Harvey, J. H., Yarkin, K. L., Lightner, J. M., & Town, J. P. (1980). Unsolicited interpretation and recall of interpersonal events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 551-568.
32.
Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Love, sex and intimacy. New York: HarperCollins.
33.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
34.
Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1992). Romantic love. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
Holmberg, D., & Veroff, J. (1996). Rewriting relationship memories: The effects of courtship and wedding scripts. In G. J. O Fletcher & J. Fitness (Eds.), Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach (pp. 345-368).
36.
Holmes, J. G., & Rempel, J. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Close Relationships: Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 315-359). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
Ickes, W. (1993). Empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality, 61, 587-609.
38.
Ickes, W., Stinson, L., Bissonnette, V., & Garcia, S. (1990). Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 730-742.
39.
Jones, E. E. (1964). Ingratiation. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
40.
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266). New York: Academic.
41.
Jourard, S. M. (1971). The transparent self. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
42.
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192-240). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
43.
Kelley, H. H. (1979). Personal relationships: Their structures and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
44.
Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (1983). Close relationships. San Francisco: Freeman.
45.
Knapp, M. L., & Vangelisti, A. L. (1991). Interpersonal communication and human relationships (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
46.
Larson, R., & Richards, M. H. (1994). Divergent realities: The emotional lives of mothers, fathers, and adolescents. New York: Basic Books.
47.
Lewis, C. S. (1961). A grief observed. New York: Bantam.
48.
McAdams, D. P. (1989). Intimacy: The need to be close. New York: Doubleday.
49.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.
51.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
52.
Mills, J., & Clark, M. S. (1982). Exchange and communal relationships. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 121-144). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
53.
Murray, S., & Holmes, J. G. (1993). Seeing virtues in faults: Negativity and the transformation of interpersonal narratives in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 707-722.
54.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79-98.
55.
Orvis, B. R., Kelley, H. H., & Butler, D. (1976). Attributional conflict in young couples. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 353-386). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
56.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1991). A theory of explanation-based decision making. In G. Klein, J. Orasanu, & R. Calderwood (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 115-142). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
57.
Planalp, S. (1987). Interplay between relational knowledge and events. In R. Burnett, P. McGhee, & D. D. Clarke (Eds.), Accounting for relationships: Explanation, representation and knowledge (pp. 175-191). New York: Methuen.
58.
Prager, K. J. (1995). The psychology of intimacy. New York: Guilford.
59.
Reis, H. T., & Patrick, B. C. (1996). Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 523-563). New York: Guilford.
60.
Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367-389). Chichester, England: Wiley.
61.
Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 95-103.
62.
Ross, M. (1989). Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review, 96, 341-357.
63.
Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172-186.
64.
Rusbult, C. E., Zembrodt, I. M., & Gunn, L. K. (1982). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1230-1242.
65.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
66.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1995). Knowledge and memory: The real story. In R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. VIII, pp. 1-86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
67.
Schönbach, P. (1992). Interactions of process and moderator variables in account episodes. In J. H. Harvey, T. L. Orbuch, & A. L. Weber (Eds.), Attributions, accounts, and close relationships (pp. 40-51) New York: Springer-Verlag.
68.
Schwartz, P. (1994). Peer marriage. New York: Macmillan.
69.
Simpson, J. A., & Harris, B. A. (1994). Interpersonal attraction. In A. L. Weber & J. H. Harvey (Eds.), Perspectives on close relationships (pp. 45-66). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
70.
Surra, C. A., & Bohman, T. (1991). The development of close relationships: A cognitive perspective. In G. J. O. Fletcher & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Cognition in close relationships (pp. 283-304). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
71.
Swann, W. B., Jr. (1996). Self-traps: The elusive quest for higher self-esteem. New York: Freeman.
72.
Swann, W. B., Jr., De La Ronde, C., & Hixon, J. G. (1994). Authenticity and positive strivings in marriage and courtship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 857-869.
73.
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Morrow.
74.
Taylor, S. E. (1981). The interface of cognitive and social psychology. In J. H. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 189-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
75.
Veroff, J., Sutherland, L., Chadiha, L., & Ortega, R. M. (1993). Newlyweds tell their stories: A narrative method for assessing marital experiences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 437-457.
76.
Wallerstein, J. S. (1995). The good marriage. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
77.
Wiese, D. (1996). “Minding,” personality, affect, and self—peer judgments: An integrative approach. Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa.
78.
Wicklund, R. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1982). Symbolic self-completion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
