A hands-on lab for a lower division research methods course used an online format with Web page, Web forms, an e-mail listproc, and chat room. The virtual section received a higher rating for overall value than did the in-person labs. Students liked its convenience and flexibility. There were no significant differences in examination performance between students who took the online lab and 12 others who requested it, but could not be accommodated. Compared with the traditional course, more time was required in constructing assignments and communicating with students. A major advantage was eliciting responses from all students in contrast with the usual lab section.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Dietz-UhlerB.Bishop-ClarkC. (2001). The use of computer-mediated communication to enhance subsequent face-to-face discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 269–283.
2.
KazmerskiV. A.BlaskoD. G. (1999). Teaching observational research in introductory psychology: Computerized and lecture-based methods. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 295–298.
3.
MakiR. H.MakiW.S.PattersonM.WhittakerP. D. (2000). Evaluation of a Web-based introductory psychology course: I. Learning and satisfaction in on-line versus lecture courses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 32, 230–239.
4.
PearJ. J.NovakM. (1996). Computer-aided personalized system of instruction: A program evaluation. Teaching of Psychology, 23, 119–123.
5.
SommerR. (1999). Personal space invasion. In BenjaminL. T.Jr.NodineB. F.ErnstR. M.Blair-BroekerC. (Eds.), Activities handbook for the teaching of psychology (pp. 332–335). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
WaschullS. B. (2001). The online delivery of psychology courses: Attrition, performance, and evaluation. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 143–147.
