Volunteering in Research: Student Satisfaction and Educational Benefits

Abstract

Participating in a research activity by volunteering in a research study or by writing a short research paper as part of a course requirement relates to favorable perceptions of psychology and research, greater knowledge of procedures associated with participation, and other demographic and situational variables. College students who volunteered to participate in a research study were more satisfied with their experiences than those who wrote papers as part of their research activity. Gender, grade expected, employment status, major, class size, and number of participation events related to satisfaction with experiences and perceptions of psychology and research. The findings are relevant to academic departments implementing or evaluating the existence of a participant pool.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Britton

B. K.

(1979). Ethical and educational aspects of participating as a subject in psychology experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 6, 195–198.

Chastain

Landrum

R. E.

(Eds.). (1999). Protecting human subjects: Departmental subject pools and institutional review boards. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Coulter

(1986). Academic value of research participation by undergraduates. American Psychologist, 41, 317.

Coye

R. W.

(1985). Characteristics of participants and nonparticipants in experimental research. Psychological Reports, 56, 19–25.

Daugherty

T. K.

Lawrence

J. W.

(1996). Short-term effects of research participation on college men. The Journal of Psychology, 130, 71–77.

Davis

J. R.

Fernald

P. S.

(1975). Laboratory experience versus subject pool. American Psychologist, 30, 523–524.

Holmes

D. S.

(1967). Amount of experience in experiments as a determinant of performance in later experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 403–407.

King

D. J.

(1970). The subject pool. American Psychologist, 25, 1179–1181.

Landrum

R. E.

Chastain

(1995). Experiment spot-checks: A method for assessing the educational value of undergraduate participation in research. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 17, 4–6.

10.

Lindsay

R. C.L.

Holden

R. R.

(1987). The introductory psychology subject pool in Canadian universities. Canadian Psychology, 28, 45–52.

11.

Moreland

R. L.

(1999). Evaluating students' research experiences via credit slips. In Chastain

Landrum

R. E.

(Eds.), Protecting human subjects: Departmental subject pools and institutional review boards (pp. 87–108). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

12.

Rosenthal

Rosnow

R. L.

(1975). The volunteer subject. New York: Wiley.

13.

Sieber

J. E.

(1999). What makes a subject pool (un)ethical? In Chastain

Landrum

R. E.

(Eds.), Protecting human subjects: Departmental subject pools and institutional review boards (pp. 43–64). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

14.

Sieber

J. E.

Saks

M. J.

(1989). A census of subject pool characteristics and policies. American Psychologist, 44, 1053–1061.

15.

Waite

B. M.

Bowman

L. L.

(1999). Research participation among general psychology students at a metropolitan comprehensive public university. In Chastain

Landrum

R. E.

(Eds.), Protecting human subjects: Departmental subject pools and institutional review boards(pp. 69–85). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.