Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this article we describe a new classroom exercise for introducing the actor-observer bias in social perception. We describe 2 experiments that compared our new technique (which involves resolving interpersonal dilemmas for oneself and another) with a previously established technique (judging the applicability of traits for oneself and another). Results of Experiment 1 suggested that the new technique is as effective as the old technique for demonstrating the actor-observer bias and that quiz scores were better for those who completed the new technique. Results of Experiment 2 indicated that the new technique is more enjoyable, memorable, valuable, and helpful and more likely to be recommended by students for use in the classroom.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bolt

(1999). Instructor's manual to accompany Myers's Social Psychology (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Choi

Nisbett

R. E.

(1998). Situational salience and cultural differences in the correspondence bias and actor-observer bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 949–960.

Fincham

F. D.

Beach

S. R.

Baucom

D. H.

(1987). Attribution processes in distressed and nondistressed couples: 4. Self-partner attribution differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 739–748.

Gilbert

D. T.

(1995). Attribution and interpersonal perception. In Tesser

(Ed.), Advanced social psychology (pp. 99–147). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Johnson

J. T.

Boyd

K. R.

(1995). Dispositional traits versus the content of experience: Actor/observer differences in judgments of the “authentic self.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 375–383.

Jones

E. E.

Harris

V. A.

(1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1–24.

Jones

E. E.

Nisbett

R. E.

(1987). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In Jones

E. E.

Kanouse

D. E.

Kelley

H. H.

Nisbett

R. E.

Valins

Weiner

(Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79–94). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Kunda

Nisbett

R. E.

(1986). The psychometrics of everyday life. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 195–224.

Miller

A. G.

Jones

E. E.

Hinkle

(1981). A robust attribution error in the personality domain. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 587–600.

10.

Myers

D. G.

(1999). Social psychology (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

11.

Nisbett

R. E.

Caputo

Legant

Marecek

(1973). Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 154–164.

12.

Ross

(1977). The intuitive scientist and his shortcomings. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 174–221). New York: Academic.

13.

Ross

L. D.

Amabile

T. M.

Steinmetz

J. L.

(1977). Social roles, social control, and biases in social-perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 485–494.

14.

Watson

(1982). The actor and the observer: How are their perceptions of causality divergent? Psychological Bulletin, 92, 682–700.

A New Technique for Demonstrating the Actor-Observer Bias

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References