DukeJ. D. (1978). Tables to help students grasp size differences in simple correlations. Teaching of Psychology, 5, 219–221.
6.
GiesbrechtN.SellY.ScialfaC.SandalsL.EhlersP. (1997). Essential topics in introductory statistics and methodology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 24, 242–246.
7.
GoldsteinM. D.StrubeM. J. (1995). Understanding correlations: Two computer exercises. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 205–206.
8.
HuckS. W.WrightS. P.ParkS. (1992). Pearson's r and spread: A classroom demonstration. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 45–47.
9.
LorenzF. O. (1987). Teaching about influence in simple regression. Teaching Sociology, 15, 173–177.
10.
MitchellM. L.JolleyJ. M. (1999). The correlator: A self-guided tutorial. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 298–299.
11.
PavkovT. W.PierceK. A. (2000). Ready, set, go! A student guide to SPSS® 9.0 for Windows®.Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
12.
PedenB. F.HausmannS. E. (2000).Data graphs in introductory and upper level psychology textbooks: A content analysis. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 93–97.
13.
PittengerD. J. (1995). Teaching students about graphs. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 125–128.
14.
SPSS, Inc. (1998). SPSS 9.0 for Windows [Computer software]. Chicago: Author.
15.
StanovichK. E. (1998). How to think straight about psychology (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
16.
TufteE. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information.Cheshire, CT: Graphics.
17.
FlanaganM. F.RalstonD. A. (1983). Intra-coordinated team teaching: Benefits for both students and instructors. Teaching of Psychology, 10, 116–117.
18.
GallianoG. (1999, February). Genes, gender, and genitalia: Confessions of a sexuality instructor. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Conference on the Teaching of Psychology, Kennesaw, GA.
19.
HockR. R. (1994, June). Human sexuality in the classroom: Unique considerations. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.
20.
MeyersS. A. (1997). Increasing student participation and productivity in small-group activities for psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 24, 105–115.
21.
BrandrietL. M. (1995). Changing nurse aide behavior to decrease learned helplessness in nursing home elders. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 16, 3–19.
22.
CautelaJ. R.UpperD. (1977). Behavior analysis, assessment, and diagnosis. In UpperD. (Ed.), Perspectives in behavior therapy (pp. 3–27). Kalamazoo, MI: Behaviordelia.
23.
ConnD. K.HerrmannN.KayeA.RewilakD.RobinsonA.SchogtB. (1992). Practical psychiatry in the nursing home: A handbook for staff.Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
MillerG. A. (1969). Psychology as a means of promoting human welfare. American Psychologist, 24, 1063–1075.
28.
Tellis-NayakV.Tellis-NayakM. (1989). Quality of care and the burden of two cultures: When the world of the nurse's aide enters the world of the nursing home. The Gerontologist, 29, 307–313.
29.
ThomsonM.BurkeK. (1998). A nursing assistant training program in a long term care setting. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 19, 23–35.
30.
AndersenJ. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In NimmoD. (Ed.), Communication yearbook3 (pp. 543–559). New Brunswick, NJ: International Communication Association.
31.
ChristensenL. J.MenzelK. E. (1998). The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning. Communication Education, 47, 82–90.
32.
FrymierA. B. (1994).A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133–144.
33.
FrymierA. B.ThompsonC. A. (1995). Using student reports to measure immediacy: Is it a valid methodology?Communication Research Reports, 12, 85–93.
34.
GorhamJ. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40–53.
35.
GorhamJ.ChristophelD. M. (1990). The relationship of teachers' use of humor in the classroom to immediacy and student learning. Communication Education, 39, 46–62.
36.
MehrabianA. (1969). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1, 203–207.
37.
MooreA.MastersonJ. T.ChristophelD. M.SheaK. A. (1996). College teacher immediacy and student ratings of instruction. Communication Education, 45, 29–39.
38.
RichmondV. P.GorhamJ. S.McCroskeyJ. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In McLaughlinM. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 574–590). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39.
BryantJ.ComiskyP.CraneJ. S.ZillmanD. (1980). Relationship between college teachers' use of humor in the classroom and students' evaluations of their teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 511–519.
40.
d'ApolloniaS.AbramiP. C. (1997). Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist, 52, 1198–1208.
41.
DivokyJ. J.RothermelM. A. (1988). Student perceptions of the relative importance of dimensions of teaching performance across type of class. Educational Research Quarterly, 12, 40–45.
42.
FeldmanK. A. (1988). Effective college teaching from the students' and faculty's view: Matched or mismatched priorities?Research in Higher Education, 28, 291–344.
43.
FernandezJ.MateoM. A. (1992). Student evaluation of university teaching quality: Analysis of a questionnaire for a sample of university students in Spain. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 675–686.
44.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.BalkinD. B. (1992). Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 921–955.
45.
GreenwaldA. G. (1997). Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist, 52, 1182–1186.
46.
GreenwaldA. G.GillmoreG. M. (1997). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist, 52, 1209–1217.
47.
KellerJ. W.MattieN.VodanovichS. J.PiotrowskiC. (1991). Teaching effectiveness: Comparisons between traditional and nontraditional college students. Innovative Higher Education, 15, 177–184.
48.
LoweD. W.BrockJ. (1994). Characteristics of effective graduate psychology courses: Student and faculty perspectives. Teaching of Psychology, 21, 82–85.
49.
MarshH. W.RocheL.A. (1997). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. American Psychologist, 52, 1187–1197.
50.
McKeachieW. J. (1997). Student ratings: The validity of use. American Psychologist, 52, 1218–1225.
51.
NdlovuS. M. (1995). African students' experiences of learning in a predominantly White university (the Department of Historical Studies, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa): A case study. Unpublished master's thesis, Vista University, Sebokeng Campus, South Africa.
52.
PoonyakanokP.ThisayakornN.DigbyP. W. (1986). Student evaluation of teacher performance: Some initial research findings from Thailand. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2, 145–154.
53.
WilsonJ.ChristianC. (1986). Nontraditional female students tell what they want from a college. College Student Journal, 20, 428–429.
54.
ZollerU. (1992). Faculty teaching performance evaluation in higher science and education: Issues and implications (a cross-cultural case study). Science Education, 76, 673–684.