Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this article, we present a method for illustrating the continuity of behavior during schedules of reinforcement. Students experienced either a fixed-interval 15-sec schedule in which the first contact after 15 sec of a cursor on a computer screen with a 0.7-cm diameter virtual (invisible) target resulted in reinforcement (a beep) or a fixed-ratio 5 schedule in which every 5th contact with the target produced the reinforcer. In addition to illustrating the continuity of behavior, this method provides a means of exposing students to concepts and methods such as the acquisition of operant behavior, the assignment-of-credit problem, the organization of behavior across time, and the analysis of single-subject data.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dews

P. B.

(1969). Studies on responding under fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement: The effects on the pattern of responding of changes in requirements at reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 191–199.

Ferster

Skinner

B. F.

(1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Kazdin

A. E.

(1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.

Killeen

P. R.

(1994). Mathematical principles of reinforcement. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 105–172.

Machado

(1997). Learning the temporal dynamics of behavior. Psychological Review, 104, 241–265.

Machado

Silva

F. J.

(1998). Greatness and misery in the teaching of the psychology of learning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 215–234.

Microsoft Excel 4.0 [Computer software]. (1992). Redmond, WA: Microsoft.

Minsky

(1961). Steps toward artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the Institutes of Radio Engineers, 49, 10–30.

Pear

J. J.

Legris

J. A.

(1987). Shaping by automated tracking of an arbitrary operant response. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 241–247.

10.

Sidman

(1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York: Basic Books.

11.

Siegel

McEnerney

Neal

(1991). THINK Pascal 4.0 [Computer software]. Cupertino, CA: Symantec.

12.

Silva

F. J.

Pear

J. J.

(1995). Stereotypy of spatial movements during noncontingent and contingent reinforcement. Animal Learning & Behavior, 23, 245–255.

13.

Silva

F. J.

Pear

J. J.

Tait

R. W.

Forest

J. J.

(1996). Fourier analysis of movement patterns in pigeons. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 27–37.

14.

Silva

K. M.

Timberlake

(1998). The organization and temporal properties of appetitive behavior in rats. Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 182–195.

15.

Skinner

B. F.

(1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

16.

Skinner

B. F.

(1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504.

17.

Staddon

J. E. R.

Zhang

(1991). On the assignment-of-credit problem in operant conditioning. In Commons

M. L.

Grossberg

Staddon

J. E. R.

(Eds.), Neural network models of conditioning and action (pp. 279–293). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

A Method for Illustrating the Continuity of Behavior during Schedules of Reinforcement

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References