In this activity, I provide a way to collect data on a gender difference—smiling in yearbook photos—without leaving the classroom. I also provide an effective procedure for reviewing or introducing a number of methodological concepts. Two sections of Psychology of Gender students (N = 45) rated the activity high on achievement of purpose and enjoyability, and 95% recommended using the exercise in future classes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BatesJ. A. (1991). Teaching hypothesis testing by debunking a demonstration of telepathy. Teaching of Psychology, 18, 94–97.
2.
BritonN. J.HallJ. A. (1995). Gender-based expectancies and observer judgments of smiling. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19, 49–65.
3.
BugentalD. E.LoveL. R.GianettoR. M. (1971). Perfidious feminine faces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 314–318.
4.
DeauxK. (1976). The behavior of women and men.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5.
DeutschF. M. (1990). Status, sex, and smiling: The effect of role on smiling in men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 531–540.
6.
GoldsteinM. D.HopkinsJ. R.StrubeM. J. (1994). “The eye of the beholder”: A classroom demonstration of observer bias. Teaching of Psychology, 21, 154–157.
7.
HallJ. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
HallJ. A. (1987). On explaining gender differences: The case of nonverbal communication. In ShaverP.HendrickC. (Eds.), Sex and gender: Vol. 7. Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 177–200). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
HallJ. A.HalberstadtA. G. (1986). Smiling and gazing. In HydeJ. S.LinnM. C. (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 136–158). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
HenleyN. M. (1973). Status and sex: Some touching observations. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 91–93.
11.
HenleyN. M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12.
HinszV. B.TomhaveJ. A. (1991). Smile and (half) the world smiles with you, frown and you frown alone. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 586–592.
13.
HydeJ. S. (1996). Half the human experience: The psychology of women (5th ed.). Lexington, MA: Heath.
14.
KolaricG. C.GalambosN. L. (1995). Face-to-face interactions in unacquainted female-male adolescent dyads: How do girls and boys behave?Journal of Early Adolescence, 15, 363–382.
15.
Nolen-HoeksemaS. (1990). Sex differences in depression.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
RaganJ. M. (1982). Gender displays in portrait photographs. Sex Roles, 8, 33–43.
17.
TannenD. (1991). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation.New York: Ballantine.
18.
VernoyM. W. (1994). A computerized Stroop experiment that demonstrates the interaction in a 2 × 3 factorial design. Teaching of Psychology, 21, 186–189.
19.
WatsonD. L. (1990). A neat little demonstration of the benefits of random assignment of subjects in an experiment. In MakoskyV. P.SileoC. C.WhittemoreL. G.LandryC. P.SkutleyM. L. (Eds.), Activities handbook for the teaching of psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 3–4). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
