In this article we examine critically the biopsychosocial (BPS) challenge versus threat analysis proposed by Blascovich and his coworkers. We conclude that the BPS analysis should be viewed with considerable caution. We conclude this in part because the analysis is associated with notable problems, including (a) its conception of demand, (b) its definitions of goal-relevant and evaluative situations, (c) its assertion regarding primary and secondary appraisal determinants of challenge and threat, and (d) its cardiovascular (CV) predictions. We conclude this as well because BPS analysis studies have not made a compelling empirical case. BPS analysis studies are unpersuasive because (a) their CV results are only partially consistent with BPS analysis predictions, (b) they have compared CV responses of groups bearing an uncertain relationship to the primary and secondary appraisal criteria specified for the production of challenge and threat effects, (c) they have not compared challenge and threat appraisals between challenge and threat groups, and (d) they provided data that are incomplete. Theoretical modifications and additional research could make a better case for the BPS view.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ax, A. F. (1953). The physiological differentiation between fear and anger in humans. Psychosomatic Medicine, 15, 433-442.
2.
Bandura, A. (1991). Self-efficacy conception of anxiety. In R. Schwarzer & R. A. Wicklund (Eds.), Anxiety and self-focused attention (pp. 89-110). Chur, Switzerland: Harwood.
3.
Berntson, G. G., Cacioppo, J. T., & Quigley, K. S. (1993). Cardiac psychophysiology and autonomic space in humans: Empirical perspectives and conceptual implications. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 296-322.
4.
Blascovich, J. (1992). A biopsychosocial approach to arousal regulation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11, 213-227.
5.
Blascovich, J., & Katkin, E. S. (Eds.). (1993). Cardiovascular reactivity to psychological stress and disease. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
Blascovich, J., & Mendes, W. B. (2000). Challenge and threat appraisals: The role of affective cues. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 59-82). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., & Lickel, B. (2000). Stigma, threat, and social interactions. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck, M. R. Hebl, & J. G. Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 307-333). New York: Guilford.
8.
Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., Lickel, B., & Kowai-Bell, N. (2001). Perceiver threat in social interactions with stigmatized others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 253-267.
9.
Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., & Salomon, K. (1999). Social “facilitation” as challenge and threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 68-77.
10.
Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1996). The biopsychosocial model of arousal regulation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 29 (pp. 1-51). New York: Academic.
11.
Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. (1989). The intensity of motivation. In M. R. Rozenweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (pp. 109-131). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
12.
Brener, J. (1987). Behavioral energetics: Some effects of uncertainty on the mobilization and distribution of energy. Psychophysiology, 24, 499-512.
13.
Brownley, K. A., Hurwitz, B. E., & Schneiderman, N. (2000). Cardiovascular psychophysiology. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson, Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 224-264). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Fridlund, A. J. (1990). The skeletomotor system. In J. T. Cacioppo & L. G. Tassinary (Eds.), Principles of psychophysiology: Physical, social, and inferential elements (pp. 456-512). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Contrada, R. J., Cather, C., & O'Leary, A. (1999). Personality and health: Dispositions and processes in disease susceptibility and adaptation to illness. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.). Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 576-604). New York: Guilford.
16.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
17.
Cox, T. (1978). Stress. Baltimore: University Park Press.
18.
Dembroski, T. M.. Schmidt, T. H., & Blümchen, G. (1983). Biobehavioral bases of behaviorNew York: Karger.
19.
Dienstbier, R. A. (1989). Arousal of physiological toughness: Implications for physical and mental health. Psychological Review, 96, 84-100.
20.
Harkins, S. (2000). The potency of the potential for experimenter and self-evaluation in motivating task performance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 277-289.
21.
Kasprowicz, A. L., Manuck, S. B., Malkoff, S. B., & Krantz, D. S. (1990). Individual differences in behaviorally evoked cardiovascular response: Temporal stability and hemodynamic patterning. Psychophysiology. 27. 605-619.
22.
Lazarus, R. S. (1968). Emotion and adaptation: Conceptual and empirical relations. In W. J. Arnold (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 173-270). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
23.
Lazarus. R. S., & Folkman, S. (1994). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
24.
Light, K. C. (1981). Cardiovascular responses to effortful active coping: Implications for the role of stress in hypertension development. Psychophysiology, 17, 243-252.
25.
Mendes, W. B., Blascovich, J., Lickel, B., & Hunter, S. (2002). Challenge and threat during social interactions with white and black men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 939-952.
26.
Mendes, W. B., Blascovich, J., Major, B., & Seery, M. (2001). Challenge and threat responses during downward and upward social comparison. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 477-497.
27.
Obrist, P. A. (1976). The cardiovascular-behavioral interaction as it appears today. Psychophysiology, 13, 95-107.
28.
Obrist, P. A. (1981). Cardiovascular psychophysiology: A perspective. New York: Plenum.
29.
Obrist, P. A., Gaebelein, C. J., Teller, E. S., Langer, A. W., Grignolo, A., Light, K. C., et al. (1978). The relationship among heart rate, carotid dp/dt, and blood pressure in humans as a function of type of stress. Psychophysiology, 15, 102-115.
30.
Papillo, J. F., & Shapiro, D. (1990). The cardiovascular system. In J. T. Cacioppo & L. G. Tassinary (Eds.), Principles of psychophysiology: Physical, social, and inferential elements (pp. 456-512). New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Schachter, S. (1964). The interaction of cognitive and physiological determinants of emotional state. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 49-80). New York: Academic.
32.
Sherwood, A., Dolan, C. A., & Light, K. C. (1990). Hemodynamics of blood pressure responses during active and passive coping. Psychophysiology, 27, 656-668.
33.
Smith. C. A., & Kirby, L. D. (2001). Toward delivering on the promise of appraisal theory. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
Smith, T. W., & Gerin, W. (1998). The social psychophysiology of cardiovascular response: An introduction to the special issue. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 243-246.
35.
Tomaka, J., & Blascovich, J. (1994). Effects of justice beliefs on cognitive appraisal of, and subjective, physiological, and behavioral responses to, potential stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 732-740.
36.
Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., Kelsey, R. M., & Leitten, C. L. (1993). Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 248-260.
37.
Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., Kibler, J., & Ernst, J. M. (1997). Cognitive and physiological antecedents of threat and challenge appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 63-72.
38.
Tomaka, J., Palacios, R., Schneider, K. T., Colotla, M., Concha, J. B., & Herrald, M. M. (1999). Assertiveness predicts threat and challenge reactions to potential stress among women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1008-1021.
39.
Tomaka, J., & Palacios-Esquivel, R. L. (1997). Motivational systems and stress-related cardiovascular reactivity. Motivation and Emotion, 21, 275-296.
40.
Webster's ninth new collegiate dictionary (1985). Springfield, MA: Merriam.
41.
Wright, R. A., Dill, J. C., Geen, R. G., & Anderson, C. A. (1998). Social evaluation influence on cardiovascular response to a fixed behavioral challenge: Effects across a range of difficulty levels. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 277-285.
42.
Wright, R. A., & Kirby, L. D. (2001). Effort determination of cardiovascular response: An integrative analysis with applications in social psychology. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 255-307). San Diego, CA: Academic.
43.
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.
44.
Zillmann, D. (1983). Transfer of excitation in emotional behavior. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology (pp. 215-235). New York: Guilford.
