People in Nepal labeled as low-caste carry the double burden of simultaneous denial of access to resources and to public space in which to discuss caste issues. Following the 2015 earthquake, issues regarding caste were pushed onto the national agenda through various groups seizing the window of opportunity to bring awareness to address issues related to caste rights and discrimination. Positioned in the Focusing Events Theory, we seek to understand how groups may have used the Nepal 2015 earthquake to mobilize to increase issue attention to caste and disaster vulnerability. To identify themes around these areas, we reviewed key news articles that were published in Nepalese and international media in the two-year time frame after the earthquake. We identified issue framing with several major themes: opportunities for lessons learned, outsiders and higher caste as “rescuing” lower caste, and disaster vulnerability linked to caste.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjayiT., and WigleyE., 2016. Nepal; Rebuilding a nation reduced to the Stone Age by earthquake, The Sunday Herald (Glasgow), 24 April 2016.
2.
AldrichD. P., 2010. Separate and unequal: Post-tsunami aid distribution in Southern India, Social Science Quarterly91, 1369–1389.
3.
AlinskyS. D., 1941. Community analysis and organization, American Journal of Sociology, 2, 797–808.
4.
BirklandT. A., 1997. After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events, Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.
5.
BirklandT. A., 1998. Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting, Journal of Public Policy18, 53–74.
6.
BirklandT. A., 2005. An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making, 2nd edition, M. E. Sharpe, Inc., New York, NY.
7.
BirklandT. A., 2006. Lessons of Disaster: Policy Change after Catastrophic Events, Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.
8.
BirklandT. A., and DeYoungS. E., 2011. Emergency response, doctrinal confusion, and federalism in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, Publius: The Journal of Federalism41, 471–493.
9.
BirklandT. A., and LawrenceR. G., 2009. Media framing and policy change after Columbine, American Behavioral Scientist52, 1405–1425.
10.
CadwalladrC., 2016. Kathmandu by Thomas Bell – Review; Nepal's earthquake, a year ago this week, is just one chapter in the country's tragic history, The Observer (London), 24 April 2016.
11.
CameronM. M., 1998. On the Edge of the Auspicious: Gender and Caste in Nepal, University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL.
12.
ComfortL., WisnerB., CutterS., PulwartyR., HewittK., Oliver-SmithA., and KrimgoldF., 1999. Reframing disaster policy: The global evolution of vulnerable communities, Environmental Hazards1, 39–44.
13.
Confidential respondent, personal communication, 12 November 2016.
14.
DenzinN. K., and LincolnY. S., 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
FolmarS., 2007. Identity politics among Dalits in Nepal, Himalaya, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies27, 6.
17.
GellnerD. N., 2007. Caste, ethnicity and inequality in Nepal, Economic and Political Weekly, 19 May 19 2007.
18.
GhaleS., 2016. The great divide: Why were discussions about relief and rebuilding being conducted in a language that was so removed from lived experience of most affected people? What kinds of solutions will emerge from a discussion that excludes its main subject from starting point?, Kathmandu Post, 24 April 2016, available at http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com/news/2016-04-24/the-great-divide.html (last accessed 10 December 2016).
19.
GunterV. J., 2005. News media and technological risks: The case of pesticides after Silent Spring, The Sociological Quarterly46, 671–698.
20.
HallC. M., 2002. Travel safety, terrorism and the media: The significance of the issue-attention cycle, Current Issues in Tourism5, 458–466.
21.
HanniganJ., 2012. Disasters Without Borders: The International Politics of Natural Disasters. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
HoffmanA. J., and OcasioW., 2001. Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events, Organization Science12, 414–434.
MilesB., and MorseS., 2007. The role of news media in natural disaster risk and recovery, Ecological Economics63, 365–373.
29.
MinklerM., and WallersteinN., 2012. Improving health through community organization and community building, in Community Organizing and Community Building for Health for Health and Welfare (MinklerM., ed.), Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, 37–58.
30.
NaqviJ., 2015. Lessons from Nepal for Kashmir, Dawn (Pakistan), 5 May 2015, available at https://www.dawn.com/news/1179950 (last accessed December 2017).
31.
NightingaleA. J., 2011. Bounding difference: Intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal, Geoforum42, 153–162.
32.
OkadaA., IshidaY., and YamauchiN., 2017. Effectiveness of social media in disaster fun-draising: Mobilizing the public towards voluntary actions, International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age (IJPADA)4, 49–68.
33.
PasipanodyaT., 2008. A deeper justice: Economic and social justice as transitional justice in Nepal, The International Journal of Transitional Justice2, 378–397.
34.
PentaS., DeYoungS. E., Yoder-BontragerD., and SujiM., 2016. Trauma, victims, time, changing organizations and the Nepal 2015 earthquake, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters34, 1–31.
35.
QuarantelliE. L., 2008. Conventional beliefs and counterintuitive realities, Social Research75, 873–904.
RaoJ., 2010. The caste system: Effects on poverty in India, Nepal and Sri Lanka, Global Majority E-Journal1, 97–106.
38.
RappaportJ., 1987. Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology, American Journal of Community Psychology15, 121–148.
39.
Ray-BennettN. S., 2009. The influence of caste, class and gender in surviving multiple disasters: A case study from Orissa, India, Environmental Hazards8, 5–22.
40.
Ray-BennettN. S., CollinsA., BhuiyaA., EdgeworthR., NaharP., and AlamgirF., 2010. Exploring the meaning of health security for disaster resilience through people's perspectives in Bangladesh, Health & Place16, 581–589.
41.
RowleyT. I., and MoldoveanuM., 2003. When will stakeholder groups act? An interest-and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization, Academy of Management Review28, 204–219.
42.
SabatierP. A., 1988. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein, Policy Sciences21, 129–168.
43.
SchlagerE., 1995. Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework, Policy Sciences28, 243–270.
44.
SeddonD., AdhikariJ., and GurungG., 2002. Foreign labor migration and the remittance economy of Nepal, Critical Asian Studies34, 19–40.
45.
ShihT. J., WijayaR., and BrossardD., 2008. Media coverage of public health epidemics: Linking framing and issue attention cycle toward an integrated theory of print news coverage of epidemics, Mass Communication & Society11, 141–160.
46.
StoneD., 2002. Policy Paradox, the Art of Political Decision Making. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, NY.
47.
SubediM., 2011. Caste system: Theories and practices in Nepal, Himalayan Journal of Sociology and Anthropology4, 134–159.
48.
TierneyK., BevcC., and KuligowskiE., 2006. Metaphors matter: Disaster myths, media frames, and their consequences in Hurricane Katrina, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science604, 57–81.
