Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper presents and validates an analytical formulation, denoted as Performance Prediction Equations (PPEs), that relates the seismic response engineering demand parameter (EDP) of buildings to earthquake parameters such as magnitude, epicentral distance, and type of faulting. PPEs are conceptually novel and can be readily included in any hazard calculation program to directly estimate EDP hazard curves. The PPEs presented herein are based on the linearization of response spectrum analysis (RSA) formulation for estimation of the seismic response of multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) models for planar structural systems. Equations for mean and variance are provided for floor displacement, interstory drift ratio, and normalized base shear. The input parameters needed to apply the proposed PPEs are the modal properties of the structural system and the selection of an existing ground motion model (GMM). The proposed PPEs are validated against simulated results using a set of planar building models and the Campbell-Bozorgnia 2014 GMM. The comparison confirms that the proposed PPEs provide an accurate estimate of the statistics of the said EDPs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

J. W.

and Cornell

C. A.

2003. Uncertainty Specification and Propagation for Loss Estimation Using FOSM Method, PEER 2003/07, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center UC-Berkeley, Berkeley, California.

Baker

J. W.

and Cornell

C. A.

2005. Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis, Tech. Rep. No. 150, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University.

Baker

J. W.

and Jayaram

2008. Correlation of spectral acceleration values from NGA ground motion models, Earthquake Spectra 24, 299–317.

Baker

J. W.

and Bradley

B. A.

2017. Intensity measure correlations observed in the NGA-West2 database, and dependence of correlations on rupture and site parameters, Earthquake Spectra (in press).

Bozorgnia

Hachem

M. M.

and Campbell

K. W.

2010a. Ground motion prediction equation (attenuation relationship) for inelastic response spectra, Earthquake Spectra 26, 1–23.

Bozorgnia

Hachem

M. M.

and Campbell

K. W.

2010b. Deterministic and probabilistic predictions of yield strength and inelastic displacement spectra, Earthquake Spectra 26, 25–40.

Bozorgnia

Abrahamson

N. A.

Al Atik

Ancheta

T. D.

Atkinson

G. M.

Baker

J. W.

Baltay

Boore

D. M.

Campbell

K. W.

Chiou

B. S.-J.

Darragh

Day

Donahue

Graves

R. W.

Gregor

Hanks

Idriss

I. M.

Kamai

Kishida

Kottke

Mahin

S. A.

Rezaeian

Rowshandel

Seyhan

Shahi

Shantz

Silva

Spudich

Stewart

J. P.

Watson-Lamprey

Wooddell

and Youngs

2014. NGA-West2 research project, Earthquake Spectra 30, 973–987.

Campbell

K. W.

and Bozorgnia

2014. NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra, Earthquake Spectra 30, 1087–1115.

Chiou

and Youngs

R. R.

2008. An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra, Earthquake Spectra 24, 173–215.

10.

Chopra

A. K.

2012. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering, 4th edition, Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 992 pp.

11.

Cornell

C. A.

1968. Engineering seismic risk analysis, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 58, 1583–1606.

12.

Cornell

C. A.

and Krawinkler

2000. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment, PEER Center News 3(2), available at https://peer.berkeley.edu/news/2000spring/performance.html.

13.

Cornell

C. A.

Jalayer

Hamburger

R. O.

and Foutch

D. A.

2002. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines, Journal of Structural Engineering 128(4), 526–533.

14.

De Biasio

Grange

Dufour

Allain

and Petre-Lazar

2014. A simple and efficient intensity measure to account for nonlinear structural behavior, Earthquake Spectra 30, 1403–1426.

15.

De Bortoli

Zareian

and Bozorgnia

2017. Magnitude and distance scaling of engineering demand parameters of moment-resisting frame structures, in Proceedings of the 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Paper no. 2438, 9–13 January, 2017, Santiago, Chile.

16.

Edwards

H. M.

1995. Linear Algebra, 1st edition, Birkhäuser, New York, 184 pp.

17.

Hancock

Bommer

J. J.

and Stafford

P. J.

2008. Numbers of scaled and matched accelerograms required for inelastic dynamic analyses, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 37, 1585–1607.

18.

Jalayer

Beck

J. L.

and Zareian

2012. Analyzing the sufficiency of alternative scalar and vector intensity measures of ground shaking based on information theory, Journal of Engineering Mechanics 138, 307–316.

19.

Kaklamanos

Baise

L. G.

and Boore

D. M.

2011. Estimating unknown input parameters when implementing the NGA ground-motion prediction equations in engineering practice, Earthquake Spectra 27, 1219–1235.

20.

Kwong

N. S.

Chopra

A. K.

and McGuire

R. K.

2015. A ground motion selection procedure for enforcing hazard consistency and estimating seismic demand hazard curves, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 44, 2467–2487.

21.

Luco

and Cornell

C. A.

2007. Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions, Earthquake Spectra 23, 357–392.

22.

McGuire

R. K.

1995. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: Closing the loop, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 85, 1275–1284.

23.

Miranda

and Taghavi

2005. Approximate floor acceleration demands in multistory buildings. I: Formulation, Journal of Structural Engineering 131, 203–211.

24.

Taghavi

and Miranda

2005. Approximate floor acceleration demands in multi- story buildings. II: Applications, Journal of Structural Engineering 131, 212–220.

25.

Tothong

and Luco

2007. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced ground motion intensity measures, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 36, 1837–1860.

26.

Wilson

E. L.

Der Kiureghian

and Bayo

E. P.

1981. A replacement for the SRSS method in seismic analysis, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 9, 187–194.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB

Performance Prediction Equations for Linear Planar Structural Systems: Concept,Formulation,and Validation

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material