Restricted accessOtherFirst published online 2013-3
The Effect of Situated Access on People with Disabilities: An Examination of Sheltering and Temporary Housing after the 2011 Japan Earthquake and Tsunami
The 11 March 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake and tsunami that devastated coastal communities in three Japanese prefectures resulted in tremendous loss of life, loss of property, and community disruption. Yet research on the disaster pointed to differential impacts for people with disabilities compared to the rest of the population. Reconnaissance fieldwork took place in Miyagi and Iwate Prefectures 3, 10, and 17 months after the disaster. Interviews and observations point to situated access as a contributor to how and to what extent people with disabilities (PWD) received resources and services. That is, the ability of evacuees to acquire and utilize information, material resources, or services was based both on the physical location of the individual or group (including shelter type to where they evacuated) and the social standpoint or circumstances of the individual or group within that physical location. We offer a close examination of the effect of situational access for people with disabilities in particular. Where limitations were present, they often led to additional disparities.
Americans with Disabilities Act, 2011. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, available at http://www.ada.gov/pubs/ada.htm (last accessed 30 September 2011).
3.
AndersonM. B., and WoodrowP. J., 1998. Rising from the Ashes: Development Strategies in Times of Disaster, Lynne Reiner, Boulder, CO, 338 pp.
4.
BerreyE., HoffmanS. G., and NielsenL. B., 2012. Situated justice: A contextual analysis of fairness and inequality in employment discrimination litigation, Law and Society Review46, 1–36.
5.
BolinR., JacksonM., and CristA., 1998. Gender inequality, vulnerability, and disaster: Issues in theory and research, in The Gendered Terrain of Disasters: Through Women's Eyes, EnarsonE., and MorrowB.H. (editors), Praeger, Westport, CT, 27–44.
6.
Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, 2011. Transition of the Number of Evacuees, Comparison among Earthquakes, Kobe Earthquake and Chuetsu Earthquakes, available at http://www.cao.go.jp/shien/1-hisaisha/pdf/5-hikaku.pdf (last accessed 27 July 2011; in Japanese).
CannonT., 1994. Vulnerability analysis and the explanation of “natural” disasters, in Disasters, Development and Environment, VarleyA. (editor), Wiley, London.
9.
ChangS., AldrichD., EisnerR., JohnsonL., NortonT., TierneyK., WachtendorfT., BrittinghamR., IuchiK., SafaieS., and WilsonJ., 2011. The March 11, 2011, great East Japan (Tohoku) earthquake and tsunami: Societal Dimensions (EERI Special Earthquake Report), Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA, available at http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/2011-03-11-sendai/files/2011/03/Japan-SocSci-Rpt-hirez-rev.pdf (last accessed 23 April 2012).
10.
CutterS., BoruffB., and ShirleyW., 2003. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards, Social Science Quarterly84, 242–261.
11.
DrabekT. E., and BoggsK. S., 1968. Families in disaster: Reactions and relatives, Journal of Marriage and the Family30, 443–451.
12.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2011. Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Public Law 93-288), available at http://www.fema.gov/about/stafact.shtm (last accessed 21 October 2011).
13.
FukuzawaS., 2008. A study on evacuation support to elderly people at the time of the flood damage, available at http://www.earoph.info/pdf/2008papers/6-7.pdf (last accessed 25 April 2012).
HewittK., 2007. Preventable disasters: Addressing social vulnerability, institutional risk, and civil ethics, Georgaphische Rundschau International Edition3, 43–52.
16.
KailesJ. I., and EndersA., 2007. Moving beyond “special needs,”Journal of Disability Policy Studies17, 230–237.
17.
KlinenbergE., 2002. Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 328 pp.
18.
LarsonJ., 2006. Setting the Record Straight: More than 52,000 Europeans Died from Heat in Summer 2003, Earth Policy Institute, Washington, D.C.
19.
LindellM. K., PraterC. S., SandersonW. G.Jr., LeeH. M., ZangY., MohiteA., and HwangS. N., 2001. Texas Gulf Coast Residents’ Expectations and Intentions Regarding Hurricane Evacuation, Texas A&M University Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center, College Station, TX available at http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/dem/documents/hurr/hurr_coast_behavior.pdf (last accessed 13 May 2013).
20.
MarcusA., 2003. Universal, ubiquitous, user-interface design for the disabled and elderly. Interactions2, 23–27.
McEntireD., 2004. Tenets of vulnerability: an assessment of a fundamental disaster concept, Journal of Emergency Management2, 23–29.
23.
McGuireL. C., FordE. S., and OkoroC. A., 2007. Natural disasters and older U.S. adults with disabilities: Implications for evacuation, Disasters31, 49–56.
24.
MiletiD., SorensonJ., and O'BrienP., 1992. Toward an explanation of mass care shelter use in evacuations, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters10, 25–42.
25.
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication, 2011. Summary of the results: Population and households statistics, Basic Complete Tabulation on Population and Households of the 2010 Population Census of Japan, available at http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/kokusei/2010/basic1/pdf/summary.pdf (last accessed 25 April 2012).
26.
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication, 2012. Summary of the results: Labor force statistics, Basic Complete Tabulation on Population and Households of the 2010 Population Census of Japan, available at http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/kokusei/2010/basic2/pdf/summary.pdf (last accessed 25 April 2012).
27.
MiyamotoT., 2011. Field report on response of the East Japan earthquake through back up to support in Tohno, Presentation at the Disaster Research Center, Newark, DE, presented 14 June 2011.
28.
National Council on Disability (NCD), 2006. The impact of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on persons with disabilities: A look back and remaining challenges, National Council on Disability, Washington, D.C., available at http://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/publications/2006/hurricanes_impact.htm (last accessed 11 April 2011).
29.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2005. Hurricane Isabel Assessment: Review of Hurricane Evacuation Study Products and other Aspects of the National Hurricane Mitigation and Preparedness Program (NHMPP) in the Context of the Hurricane Isabel Response, prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Philadelphia and Wilmington Districts) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, available at http://www.csc.noaa.gov/hes/docs/postStorm/Isabel_PostStorm_Summary.pdf (last accessed 31 Mary 2012).
30.
National Police Agency of Japan, 2011. Damage Situation and Police Countermeasures Associated with 2011 Tohoku District—Off the Pacific Ocean Earthquake, available at http://www.npa.go.jp/archive/keibi/biki/index_e.htm (last accessed 5 July 2011).
31.
OtaniJ., 2010. Older People in Natural Disasters, Kyoto University Press/Trans Pacific Press, Portland, OR, 278 pp.
32.
ParsonsB. S., and FulmerD., 2007. The paradigm shift in planning for special-needs populations, Emergency Management in Higher Education, Current Practices and Conversations, Papers from the 2007 FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Conference, available at http://rems.ed.gov/docs/SpecialNeeds_ParadigmShiftInPlanning_2007.pdf (last accessed 12 February 2012).
33.
SaitoY., 2006. Awareness of universal design among facility managers in Japan and the United States, Automation in Construction15, 462–478.
34.
SharkeyP., 2007. Survival and death in New Orleans: An empirical look at the human impact of Katrina, Journal of Black Studies37, 482–501.
35.
StassenG., 1994. Michael Walzer's situated justice, The Journal of Religious Ethics22, 375–399.
36.
TatsukiS., 2011. Plenary: Catastrophe in Japan: A preliminary assessment, 36th Annual Natural Hazards Research and Applications Workshop, 11 July 1201 Broomfield, CO.
37.
TwiggJ., KettM., BottomleyH., TanL., and NasreddinH., 2011. Disability and public shelter in emergency, Environmental Hazards10, 248–261.
WisnerB., 2002. Disability and disaster: Victimhood and agency in earthquake risk reduction, in Earthquakes Risk Reduction, RodriguezC., and RovaiE. (editors), forthcoming.
41.
WisnerB., BlaikieP., CannonT., and DavisI., 2004. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disaster, 2nd edition, Routledge, London.
