By means of three-dimensional (3-D) numerical simulations, including the Laboratoire Souterrain à Bas-Bruit (LSBB) topography, we carefully analyze site effects assessments yielded by two approaches: the classical site to reference spectral-ratio method (SRM) and the statistical median reference method (MRM). We show for both isotropic and double-couple point sources that a 94% reduction in the number of stations of a regularly spaced array yields MRM site-effect estimates within 5% of those obtained from the absolute regional median, and within 20% using a 98% station reduction with irregularly located sites. In contrast, the SRM yielded site-effect overestimates greater than 50% in some areas and up to 100% in specific sites, which makes the MRM much more robust than the SRM. We determined a 33% probability to exceed an amplification factor of 2, and an 8% probability to exceed a factor of 3 due to topography in the surroundings of the sharpest summit of the LSBB area.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshfordS. A.SitarN.1997. Analysis of topographic amplification of inclined shear waves in a steep coastal bluff, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 87, 692–700.
2.
AssimakiD.GazetasG.KauselE.2005a. Effects of local soil conditions on the topographic aggravation of seismic motion: parametric investigation and recorded field evidence from the 1999 Athens earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 95, 1059–1089.
3.
AssimakiD.KauselE.GazetasG.2005b. Soil-dependent topographic effects: a case study from the 1999 Athens earthquake, Earthquake Spectra21, 929–966.
4.
BardP.-Y.MéneroudJ.-P.1987. Modification du signal sismique par la topographie, cas de la vallée de la Roya (Alpes Maritimes), Bull. liaison Labo. P. et Ch. 150/151, 140–151.
5.
BohlenT.SaengerE. H.2006. Accuracy of heterogeneous staggered-grid finite-difference modeling of Rayleigh waves, Geophysics71, T109–T115.
6.
BooreD. M.1972. A note on the effect of simple topography on seismic SH waves, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 62, 275–284.
7.
BooreD. M.HarmsenS. C.HardingS. T.1981. Wave scattering from a step change in surface topography, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 71, 117–125.
8.
BorcherdtR. D.1970. Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 60, 29–61.
9.
BouchonM.1973. Effect of topography on surface motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 63, 615–632.
10.
BouchonM.BarkerJ. S.1996. Seismic response of a hill: the example of Tarzana, California, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, 66–72.
11.
ÇelebiM.1987. Topographical and geological amplifications determined from strong-motion and aftershocks records of the 3 march 1985 Chile earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 77, 1147–1167.
12.
ChaljubE.MoczoP.TsunoS.BardP.-Y.KristekJ.KäserM.StupazziniM.KristekovaM.2010. Quantitative comparison of four numerical predictions of 3-D ground motion in the Grenoble valley, France, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 100, 1427–1455.
13.
Chávez-GarcíaF. J.PedottiG.HatzfeldD.BardP.-Y.1990. An experimental study of site effects near Thessaloniki (Northern Greece), Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 80, 784–806.
14.
Chávez-GarcíaF. J.SánchezL. R.HatzfeldD.1996. Topographic site effects and HVSR, a comparison between observations and theory, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, 1559–1573.
15.
Chávez-GarcíaF. J.RodríguezM.FieldE. H.HatzfeldD.1997. Topographic site effects, a comparison of two nonreference methods, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 87, 1667–1673.
16.
Cruz-AtienzaV. M.2006. Rupture dynamique des failles non-planaires en différences finies, Ph.D. thesis, University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis.
Cruz-AtienzaV. M.VirieuxJ.Khors-SansornyC.SardouO.GaffetS.ValléeM.2007b. Estimation quantitative du PGA sur la Côte d'Azur, 7ème Colloque National, Association Française du Génie Parasismique (AFPS), p. 8, Ecole Centrale Paris, France.
19.
DavisL. L.WestL. R.1973. Observed effects of topography on ground motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 63, 283–298.
20.
DurandS.GaffetS.VirieuxJ.1999. Seismic diffracted waves from topography using 3-D discrete wavenumber-boundary integral equation simulation, Geophysics64, 572–578.
21.
FieldE. H.JacobK. H.1995. A comparison and test of various site-response estimation techniques, including three that are not reference-site dependent, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85, 1127–1143.
22.
GaffetS.CultreraG.DietrichM.CourboulexF.MarraF.BouchonM.CasertaA.CornouC.DeschampsA.GlotJ.-P.GuiguetR.2000. A site effect study in the Verchiano valley during the 1997 Umbria-Marche (Central Italy) earthquakes, J. Seism. 4, 525–541.
23.
GeliL.BardP.-Y.JullienB.1988. The effect of topography on earthquake ground motion: a review and new results, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 78, 42–63.
24.
HartzellS. H.CarverD. L.KingK. W.1994. Initial investigation of site and topographic effects at Robinwood Ridge, California, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, 1336–1349.
25.
KawaseH.AkiK.1990. Topography effect at the critical SV-wave incidence: possible explanation of damage pattern by the Whittier Narrows, California, earthquake of 1 October 1987, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 80, 1–22.
26.
LeeS.-J.KomatitschD.HuangB.-S.TrompJ.2009a. Effects of topography on seismic wave propagation: An example from northern Taiwan, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 99, 314–325.
27.
LeeS.-J.ChanY.-C.KomatitschD.HuangB.-S.TrompJ.2009b. Effects of realistic surface topography on seismic ground motion in the Yangminshan region of Taiwan based upon the spectral-element method and LiDAR DTM, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 99, 681–693.
28.
MaufroyE.2010. Caractérisation et modélisation numérique de l'effet de site topographique 3-D: application à la Grande Montagne de Rustrel, Vaucluse, Ph.D. thesis, University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis, France.
29.
Montalvo-ArrietaJ. C.Sánchez-SesmaF. J.ReinosoE.2002. A virtual reference site for the valley of Mexico, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 1847–1854.
30.
NechtscheinS.BardP.-Y.GarielJ.-C.MéneroudJ.-P.DervinP.CushingM.GaubertC.VidalS.DuvalA.-M.1995. A topographic effect study in the Nice region, Proceedings of the fifth International Conference on Seismic Zonation, Nice, France, 1067–1074.
PoppeliersC.PavlisG. L.2002. The seismic response of a steep slope: high-resolution observations with a dense, three-component seismic array, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 3102–3115.
33.
RogersA. M.KatzL. J.BennettT. J.1974. Topographic effects on ground motion for incident P waves: a model study, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 64, 437–456.
34.
Sanchez-SesmaF. J.CampilloM.1991. Diffraction of P, SV, and Rayleigh waves by topographic features: a boundary integral formulation, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 81, 2234–2253.
35.
SpudichP.HellwegM.LeeW. H. K.1996. Directional topographic site response at Tarzana observed in aftershocks of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake: implications for mainshock motions, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, S193–S208.
36.
SteidlJ. H.TumarkinA. G.ArchuletaR. J.1996. What is a reference site?, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, 1733–1748.
37.
TrifunacM. D.1972. Scattering of plane sh waves by a semi-cylindrical canyon, Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn. 1, 267–281.
38.
TrifunacM. D.HudsonD. E.1971. Analysis of the Pacoima dam accelerogram, San Fernando, California, earthquake of 1971, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 61, 1393–1141.
39.
TuckerB. E.KingJ. L.HatzfeldD.NersesovI. L.1984. Observations of hard-rock site effects, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 74, 121–136.
40.
UmedaY.KuroisoA.ItoK.MuramatuI.1987. High accelerations produced by the Western Nagano Prefecture, Japan, earthquake of 1984, Tectonophysics141, 335–343.
41.
WilsonD. C.PavlisG. L.2000. Near-surface site effects in crystalline bedrock: a comprehensive analysis of spectral amplitudes determined from a dense, three-component seismic array, Earth Interactions4, 1–31.
42.
WongH. L.1982. Effect of surface topography on the diffraction of P, SV, and Rayleigh waves, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 72, 1167–1183.
43.
WongH. L.TrifunacM. D.WestermoB.1977. Effects of surface and subsurface irregularities on the amplitudes of monochromatic waves, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 67, 353–368.
