This paper focuses on decision making and planning, primarily by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), for the provision of temporary housing following the 2010 Haiti earthquake. Data were obtained through interviews, observations, and document collection during four field trips to southeastern Haiti and Port-au-Prince between late January and the end of May 2010. Three sets of issues hindered decision making associated with rehousing: assessment, logistics, and governance and coordination—problems that are all too familiar in large-scale disaster settings around the world. Our findings highlight the challenges of decision making and planning during the immediate period following disasters and raise questions about the extent to which guidance on disaster-loss reduction measures is reaching societies and communities that need it most, about why approaches that have been shown to be counterproductive in other disasters continue to persist, and about the applicability of current recovery paradigms, policies, and practices in the aftermath of the Haiti earthquake and other similar contexts.
BatesF. L. (ed.), 1982. Recovery, Change and Development: A Longitudinal Study of the 1976 Guatemalan Earthquake, University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA, 906 pp.
3.
BarakatS., 2003. Housing Reconstruction After Conflict and Disaster, Network Paper No. 43, Humanitarian Practice Network of the Overseas Development Institute, London, United Kingdom, http://www.odihpn.org/documents%5Cnetworkpaper043.pdf, accessed 1 April 2001.
4.
BarensteinJ. D., 2006. Housing Reconstruction in Post-Earthquake Gujarat: A Comparative Analysis, Network Paper No. 54, Humanitarian Practice Network of the Overseas Development Institute, London, United Kingdom, http://www.odihpn.org/documents/networkpaper054.pdf, accessed 1 April 2001.
5.
BlaikieP., CannonT., DavisI., and WisnerB., 1994. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disasters, Routledge, London, United Kingdom, 496 pp.
6.
BolinR., and StanfordL., 1991. Shelter, housing and recovery: A comparison of U.S. disasters, Disasters15, 24–34.
7.
CassidyJ., 2007. Strategic planning for postdisaster temporary housing, Disasters31, 435–458.
8.
CaiaG., VentimigliaF., and MaasA., 2010. Container vs. dacha: The psychological effects of temporary housing characteristics on earthquake survivors, Journal of Environmental Psychology30, 60–66.
9.
CavalloE. A., PowellA., and BecerraO., 2010. Estimating the Direct Economic Damage of the Earthquake in Haiti, IDB Working Paper Series No. IDB-WP-163, Inter-American Development Bank, http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=35074108, accessed 1 April 2011.
10.
ChandrasekharD., 2010. Setting the stage: How policy institutions frame participation in postdisaster recovery, Journal of Disaster Research5, 130–137.
11.
ComerioM., 1997. Housing issues after disasters, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management5, 166–178.
12.
ComerioM., 1998. Disaster Hits Home: New Policy for Urban Housing Recovery, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 300 pp.
13.
ComfortL. K., 2011. Haiti: One year after, Natural Hazards Observer35, 13–14.
CrowleyS., 2006. Where is home? Housing for low-income people after the 2005 hurricanes, in There is No Such Thing as a Natural Disaster: Race, Class, and Hurricane Katrina (HartmanC. and SquiresG. D., eds.) Routledge, New York, NY, 122–166.
16.
DrabekT. E., 1986. Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 509 pp.
17.
FitzpatrickD., 2008. Women's Rights to Land and Housing in Tsunami-Affected Aceh, Indonesia, Aceh Working Paper No. 3, Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore.
KobayashiM., and MiuraK., 2000. Natural disaster and restoration housing: role of physical and interpersonal environment in making a critical transition to a new environment, in Theoretical Perspectives in Environment-Behavior Research: Underlying Assumptions, Research Problems and Methodologies (WapnerS., DemickJ., YamamotoT., and MinamiH., eds.), Kluwer Academic, New York, NY, 39–50.
26.
LevineJ. N., EsnardA-M., and SapatA., 2007. Population displacement and housing dilemmas due to catastrophic disasters, Journal of Planning Literature22, 3–15.
27.
LizarraldeG., CassidyJ., and DavidsonC., (eds.), 2010. Rebuilding After Disasters: From Emergency to Sustainability, Spon Press, New York, NY, 296 pp.
McGilvrayD., and GamburdM. R. (eds.), 2010. Tsunami Recovery in Sri Lanka: Ethnic and Regional Dimensions, Routledge, New York, NY, 208 pp.
30.
MukherjiA., 2010. Post-earthquake housing recovery in Bachhau, India: The homeowner, the renter, and the squatter, Earthquake Spectra26, 1085–1100.
31.
National Research Council (NRC), 2006. Facing Hazards and Disasters: Understanding Human Dimensions, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 394 pp.
32.
NiggJ. M., BarnshawJ., and TorresM. R., 2006. Hurricane Katrina and the flooding of New Orleans: Emergent issues in sheltering and temporary housing, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science604, 113–128.
Oliver-SmithA., 1990. Postdisaster housing reconstruction and social inequality: A challenge to policy and practice, Disasters14, 7–19.
35.
Oliver-SmithA., 1991. Successes and failures in postdisaster resettlement, Disasters15, 12–23.
36.
OlshanskyR. B., and JohnsonL. A., 2010. Clear as Mud: Planning for the Rebuilding of New Orleans, American Planning Association, Chicago, IL, 360 pp.
37.
OlshanskyR. B., JohnsonL. A., and ToppingK. C., 2006. Rebuilding communities following disaster: Lessons from Kobe and Los Angeles, Built Environment32, 354–374.
PeacockW. G., DashN., and ZhangY., 2006. Sheltering and housing recovery following disaster, in Handbook of Disaster Research (RodriguezH., QuarantelliE. L., and DynesR. R., eds.), Springer, New York, NY, 258–274.
40.
PeekL., 2008. Children and disasters: Understanding vulnerability, developing capacities, and promoting resilience—an introduction, Children, Youth and Environments18, 371–388.
41.
PeekL., and FothergillA., 2008. Displacement, gender, and the challenges of parenting after Hurricane Katrina, National Women's Studies Association Journal23, 69–105.
42.
PinchaC., 2008. Indian Ocean Tsunami Through the Gender Lens: Insights from Tamil Nadu, India, Earthworm Books for Oxfam America, Mumbai, India, 139 pp.
43.
QuarantelliE. L., 1982. General and particular observations in sheltering and housing in American disasters, Disasters6, 277–281.
44.
RitchieL. A., 2010. Unpublished Field Interviews, Haiti, 31 January–27 May 2010.
45.
SmithG., and WengerD., 2006. Sustainable disaster recovery: Operationalizing an existing agenda, in Handbook of Disaster Research (RodriguezH., QuarantelliE., and DynesR., eds.), Springer, New York, NY, 234–257.
WuJ. Y., and LindellM. K., 2004. Housing reconstruction after two major earthquakes: The 1994 Northridge earthquake in the United States and the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan, Disasters28, 63–81.
48.
TanidaN., 1996. What happened to elderly people in the great Hanshin earthquake, British Medical Journal313, 1133–1135.
49.
TierneyK. J., LindellM. K., and PerryR. W., 2001. Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States, Joseph Henry Press, Washington, D.C., 320 pp.
50.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 2010. Human Development Report 2010, http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/, accessed 18 January 2011.
51.
VastaK. S., 2004. Risk, vulnerability, and asset-based approach to disaster risk management, The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy24, 1–48.
52.
World Bank, 2010. Safer Homes, Stronger Communities: A Handbook for Reconstructing After Natural Disasters, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Washington, D.C., 408 pp.
53.
ZhangY., and PeacockW. G., 2009. Planning for housing recovery? Lessons learned from Hurricane Andrew, Journal of the American Planning Association76, 5–24.
