Following the 12 January 2010 Haiti earthquake, teams of students and faculty members from the United States and Haiti surveyed 170 reinforced concrete (RC) buildings in Port-au-Prince and Léogâne. This paper summarizes the survey results and compares them with results from a similar survey done after the 1999 earthquakes near Düzce, Turkey. The survey results demonstrate that the frequency of damage in RC buildings was higher in Haiti than in Turkey. This increased level of damage is consistent with practical screening criteria based on cross-sectional areas of building columns and walls. Based on these criteria, 90% of the structures surveyed in Haiti would have been classified as seismically vulnerable before the earthquake. Damage was more frequent in structures with captive columns. A two-tiered screening process is suggested to rapidly assess the vulnerability of scores of poorly built low-rise RC buildings in future earthquakes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CalaisE., ManakerD., AliT., FreedA., McCannW., MattioliG., JansmaP., and ChabalierJ. B., 2008. Present-day strain and stress distribution in the northeastern Caribbean, 18th Caribbean Geological Conference, 24–28 March 2008, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
2.
DönmezC., and PujolS., 2005. Spatial distribution of damage caused by the 1999 Earthquakes in Turkey, Earthquake Spectra21, 53–69.
3.
EberhardM. O., BaldridgeS., MarshallJ., MooneyW., and RixG. J., 2010. The MW 7.0 Haiti Earthquake of January 12, 2010, USGS/EERI Advance Reconnaissance Team Report: USGS Open File Report 2010–1048, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
GriffithsJ. H. P., IrfanogluA., and PujolS., 2007. Istanbul at the threshold: An evaluation of the seismic risk in Istanbul, Earthquake Spectra23, 63–75.
6.
GuevaraL. T., and GarcíaL. E., 2005. The captive- and short-column effects, Earthquake Spectra21, 141–160.
7.
GurT., PayA. C., RamirezJ. A., SözenM. A., JohnsonA. M., IrfanogluA., and BobetA., 2009. Performance of school buildings in Turkey during the 1999 Düzce and 2003 Bingol earthquakes, Earthquake Spectra25, 239–256.
8.
HassanA. F., and SözenM. A., 1997. Seismic vulnerability assessment of low-rise buildings in regions with infrequent earthquakes, ACI Structural Journal94, 31–39.
9.
LambertM., GaudinJ., and CohenR., 1987. Geologic Map of Haiti, South-East Region: Port-au-Prince, Centre d’Études et de Réalisations Cartographiques Géographiques (CERCG), National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), Paris, France.
10.
OzcebeG., YucemenM. S., and AydoganV., 2004. Statistical seismic vulnerability assessment of existing reinforced concrete buildings in Turkey on a regional scale, Journal of Earthquake Engineering8, 749–773.
11.
ÖztürkB., 2003. Seismic Drift Response of Building Structures in Seismically Active and Near-Fault Regions, Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
12.
RamírezH., 2000. Seismic Vulnerability Assessment for Public Schools in Bogotá, Colombia, Projects and Designs Ltd., Bogotá, Colombia, http://www.csc.noaa.gov/vata/VATIII_HRamirez.pdf, accessed 10 August 2010.
RiddellR., WoodS. L., de la LleraJ. C., 1987. The 1985 Chile Earthquake: Structural Characteristics and Damage Statistics for the Building Inventory in Viña del Mar, Structural Research Series No. 534, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 265 pp.
15.
SedraN., 2010. The Haiti Earthquake Database, GeorgeE. BrownJr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, http://nees.org/resources/1797, accessed 25 December 2010.
16.
ShigaT., ShibataA., and TakahashiT., 1968. Earthquake damage and wall index of reinforced concrete buildings, in Proceedings, 1968 Tobuku District Symposium (in Japanese), Architectural Institute of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, 29–32.
