A seismic site classification microzonation for the city of Port-au-Prince is presented herein. The microzonation is based on 35 shear wave velocity (VS) profiles collected throughout the city and a new geologic map of the region. The VS profiles were obtained using the multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) method, while the geologic map was developed from a combination of field mapping and geomorphic interpretation of a digital elevation model (DEM). Relationships between mean shear wave velocity over the upper 30 m of the subsurface (VS30) and surficial geologic unit have been developed, permitting code-based seismic site classification throughout the city. A site classification map for the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program/International Building Code (NEHRP/IBC) classification scheme is provided herein. Much of the city is founded on deposits that classify as either NEHRP Site Class C or D, based on VS30. Areas of the city requiring additional subsurface information for accurate site classification are noted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AssimakiD., LiW., SteidlJ. H., and TsudaK., 2008. Site amplification and attenuation via downhole array seismogram inversion: A comparative study of the 2003 Miyagi-Oki aftershock sequence, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America98, 301–330.
2.
BaraniS., De FerrariR., FerrettiG., and EvaC., 2008. Assessing the effectiveness of soil parameters for ground response characterization and soil classification, Earthquake Spectra24, 565–597.
3.
BenjumeaB., HunterJ. A., PullanS. E., BrooksG. R., PyneM., and AlysworthJ. M., 2008. VS30 and fundamental site period estimates in soft sediments of the Ottawa Valley from near-surface geophysical measurements, Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics13, 313–323.
4.
Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC), 2003. NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C.
5.
CadetH., BardP-Y., and DuvalA-M., 2008. A new proposal for site classification based on ambient vibration measurements and the KiK-net strong motion data set, Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 12–17 October 2008, Beijing, China.
6.
CassidyJ. F., and MucciarelliM., 2010. The importance of ground-truthing for earthquake site response, Proceedings of the 9th U.S. National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 25–29 July 2010, Toronto, Canada.
7.
CoxB. R., and WoodC. M., 2011. Surface wave benchmarking exercise: Methodologies, results and uncertainties, GeoRisk2011: Risk Assessment and Management in Geoengineering, ASCE Conf. Proc., 26–28 June 2011, Atlanta, GA (submitted).
8.
CoxB. R., and WoodC. M., 2010. A comparison of linear-array surface wave methods at a soft soil site in the Mississippi Embayment, Geo Florida2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling & Design, ASCE Conf. Proc., 20–24 February 2010, West Palm Beach, FL.
9.
European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2004. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, EN 1998-1, Brussels, Belgium.
10.
FotiS., 2000. Multistation Methods for Geotechnical Characterization using Surface Waves, Ph.D. dissertation, Politecnico di Torino, Italy, 229 pp.
11.
FotiS., 2005. Surface wave testing for geotechnical characterization, in Surface Waves in Geomechanics: Direct and Inverse Modelling for Soils and Rocks, CISM Series, Number 481 (LaiC. G. and WilmanskiK., eds.), Springer, Wien, New York, NY, 47–71.
12.
GallipoliM. R., and MucciarelliM., 2009. Comparison of site classification from VS30, VS10, and HVSR in Italy, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America99, 340–351.
13.
GreenR. A., OlsonS. M., CoxB. R., RixG., RathjeE., BachhuberJ., FrenchJ., LasleyS., and MartinN., 2011. Geotechnical aspects of failures at Port-au-Prince Seaport during the 12 January 2010 Haiti earthquake, Earthquake Spectra, this issue.
14.
HolzerT. L., PadovaniA. C., BennettM. J., NoceT. E., and TinsleyJ. C., 2005. Mapping NEHRP VS30 site classes, Earthquake Spectra21, 353–370.
15.
International Code Council, Inc. (ICC), 2009. International Building Code, Washington D.C.
16.
KramerS. L., 1996. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 653 pp.
17.
LambertM., GaudinJ., and CohenR., 1987. Geologic Map of Haiti, South-East Region: Port-au-Prince, Centre d’Études et de Réalisations Cartographiques Géographiques (CERCG), National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), Paris, France.
18.
OlsonS. M., GreenR. A., LasleyS., MartinN., CoxB. R., RathjeE., BachhuberJ., and FrenchJ., 2011. Documenting liquefaction and lateral spreading triggered by the 12 January 2010 Haiti earthquake, Earthquake Spectra, this issue.
19.
ParkC. B., MillerR. D., and XiaJ., 1999. Multichannel analysis of surface waves, Geophysics64, 800–808.
20.
ParkC. B., and CarnevaleM., 2010. Optimum MASW survey – Revisited after a decade of use, GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling & Design, ASCE Conf. Proc., 20–24 February 2010, West Palm Beach, FL.
21.
ParkD., and HashashY. M. A., 2005. Evaluation of seismic site factors in the Mississippi Embayment. II. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis with nonlinear site effects, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering25, 145–156.
22.
PonceN., 1791. Plan de la Ville des Rades et des Environs du Port-au-prince dans l'isle Saint Domingue, Recueil de vues des lieux principaux de la colonie françoise de Saint-Domingue, Paris, France. Obtained from the John Carter Brown Library, Brown University (JCB Call Number E791 P793r / 3-SIZE).
23.
PhungV., AtkinsonG. M., LauD. T., 2006. Methodology for site classification estimation using strong-motion data from the Chi-Chi Taiwan earthquake, Earthquake Spectra22, 511–531.
24.
RathjeE. M., BachhuberJ., DulbergR., CoxB. R., KottkeA., WoodC., GreenR., OlsonS., WellsD., RixG., 2011. Damage Patterns in Port-au-Prince during the 2010 Haiti earthquake, Earthquake Spectra, this issue.
RixG., 2005. Near-surface site characterization using surface waves, in Surface Waves in Geomechanics: Direct and Inverse Modelling for Soils and Rocks, CISM Series, Number 481, (LaiC. G. and WilmanskiK., eds.), Springer, Wien, New York, NY, 1–46.
27.
Rodriguez-MarekA., BrayJ. D., and AbrahamsonN. A., 2001. An empirical geotechnical seismic site response procedure, Earthquake Spectra17, 65–87.
28.
SandikkayaM. A., YilmazM. T., BakirB. S., and YilmazO., 2010. Site classification of Turkish national strong-motion stations, Journal of Seismology14, 543–563.
29.
SeedR. B., CetinK. O., MossR. E. S., KammererA. M., WuJ., PestanaJ. M., and RiemerM. F., 2001. Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering and seismic site response evaluation, Proceedings, 4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 26–31 March 2001, San Diego, CA.
30.
SoccoL. V., and StrobbiaC., 2004. Surface wave methods for near-surface characterisation: A tutorial, Near Surface Geophysics2, 165–185.
31.
SunC. G., KimD. S., and ChungC. K., 2005. Geologic site conditions and site coefficients for estimating earthquake ground motions in the inland areas of Korea, Engineering Geology81, 446–469.
32.
ThompsonE. M., BaiseL. G., and KayenR. E., 2007. Spatial correlation of shear-wave velocity in the San Francisco Bay Area sediments, Soil Dyn. Earth. Eng.27, 144–152.
33.
ThompsonE. M., BaiseL. G., KayenR. E., TanakaY., and TanakaH., 2010. A geostatistical approach to mapping site response spectral amplifications, Engineering Geology114, 330–342.
34.
TranK. T., and HiltunenD. R., 2008. A comparison of shear wave velocity profiles from SASW, MASW, and ReMi techniques, in Proceedings of the Conference of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV, May 18–22, 2008, Sacramento, California, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 181 (CD-ROM), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
35.
WillsC. J., ClahanK. B., 2006. Developing a map of geologically defined site-condition categories for California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.96, 1483–1501.
36.
WongI.StokoeK. H.II, CoxB. R., YuanJ., KnudsenK. L., TerraF., and OkuboP., 2011. Shear-wave velocity characterization of the USGS Hawaiian strong motion network on the island of Hawaii and development of a NEHRP site class map, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., (accepted for publication).
37.
XiaJ., MillerR. D., ParkC. B., HunterJ. A., HarrisJ. B., and IvanovJ., 2002. Comparing shear-wave velocity profiles inverted from multichannel surface wave with borehole measurements, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering22, 181–190.
38.
ZaréM., and BardP. Y., 2002. Soil motion dataset of Turkey: Data processing and site classification, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering22, 703–718.
39.
ZywickiD. J., 1999. Advanced Signal Processing Methods Applied to Engineering Analysis of Seismic Surface Waves, Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA,357 pp.
40.
ZywickiD. J., and RixG. J., 2005. Mitigation of near-field effects for seismic surface wave velocity estimation with cylindrical beamformers, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.131, 970–977.
