For the estimation of “local personal risk,” i.e., the annual probability of fatality for a hypothetical person continuously present in or near a building, an analytical methodology based on the probability of partial and complete collapse mechanisms (fragility models) and the probability of death given those collapse mechanisms (consequence models) for a building stock exposed to induced seismicity ground shaking is presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkkarS.SandıkkayaM. A.SenyurtM.Azari SisiA.AyB. O.TraversaP.DouglasJ.CottonF.LuziL.HernandezB. and GodeyS.2014Reference database for seismic ground-motion in Europe (RESORCE)Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering12311–339.
BakerJ. W.2007Probabilistic structural response assessment using vector-valued intensity measuresEarthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics361861–1883.
6.
BakerJ. W. and CornellC. A.2006Which spectral acceleration are you using?Earthquake Spectra22293–312.
7.
BalI. E.CrowleyH. and BommerJ. J.2008Displacement-based earthquake loss assessment for an earthquake scenario in IstanbulJournal of Earthquake Engineering1212–22.
8.
BourneS. J.OatesS. J.BommerJ. J.DostB.van ElkJ. and DoornhofD.2015A Monte Carlo method for probabilistic hazard assessment of induced seismicity due to conventional natural gas productionBulletin of Seismological Society of America1051721–1738.
9.
BommerJ. J.MagenesG.HancockJ. and PenazzoP.2004The influence of strong-motion duration on the seismic response of masonry structuresBulletin of Earthquake Engineering21–26.
10.
BommerJ. J.DostB.EdwardsB.StaffordP. J.van ElkJ.DoornhofD. and NtinalexisM.2016a Developing an application-specific ground-motion model for induced seismicityBulletin of Seismological Society of America106158–173.
11.
BommerJ. J.StaffordP. J.EdwardsB.DostB.van DedemE.Rodriguez-MarekA.KruiverP. P.van ElkJ.DoornhofD. and NtinalexisM.2016b Framework for a ground-motion model for induced seismic hazard and risk analysis in the Groningen gas field, The NetherlandsEarthquake Spectra33481–498.
12.
CasarottiC. and PinhoR.2007An adaptive capacity spectrum method for assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake actionBulletin of Earthquake Engineering5377–390.
13.
ChiouB.DarraghR.GregorN. and SilvaW.2008NGA project strong-motion databaseEarthquake Spectra2423–44.
14.
CoburnA. and SpenceR.2002Earthquake Protection, 2nd EditionJohn Wiley & Sons LtdChichester, UK.
15.
CoburnA. W.SpenceR. J. S. and PomonisA.1992Factors determining casualty levels in earthquakes: Mortality prediction in building collapseProceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain
16.
CrowleyH. and BommerJ. J.2006Modeling seismic hazard in earthquake loss models with spatially distributed exposureBulletin of Earthquake Engineering4249–273.
17.
DymiotisC.KapposA. J. and ChryssanthopoulosM. K.1999Seismic reliability of RC frame with uncertain drift and member capacityJournal of Structural Engineering1251038–1047.
18.
EadsL.MirandaE.KrawinklerH. and LignosD.2012An efficient method for estimating the collapse risk of structures in seismic regionsEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics4225–41.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)2003HAZUS-MH Technical ManualWashington, D.C.
21.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)2012Seismic performance assessment of buildings. Volume 1 - MethodologyWashington, D.C.
22.
GraziottiF.TomassettiU.RossiA.MarchesiB.KalliorasS.MandirolaMFragomeliA.MelliaE.PelosoS.CuppariF.GuerriniG.PennaA. and MagenesG.2015Experimental Campaign on Cavity Wall Systems Representative of the Groningen Building Stock Report n. EUC318/2015U, European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering (Eucentre)Pavia, Italy, available at www.eucentre.it/nam-project and http://www.nam.nl/feiten-en-cijfers/onderzoeksrapporten.html.
23.
GraziottiF.RossiA.MandirolaM.PennaA. and MagenesG.2016a Experimental characterization of calcium-silicate brick masonry for seismic assessmentProceedings of the 16th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference (IBMAC), Padua, Italy, 1619–1627.
24.
GraziottiF.TomassettiU.PennaA. and MagenesG.2016b Out-of-plane shaking table tests on URM single leaf and cavity wallsEngineering Structures125455–470.
25.
GraziottiF.TomassettiU.KalliorasS.PennaA. and MagenesG.2017Shaking table test on a full scale URM cavity wall buildingBulletin of Earthquake Engineering accepted for publication.
26.
Geotechnical Research Centre of Western Ontario University (GRC)2015DYNA6.1 – A program for the computation of the response of rigid foundations to all types of dynamic loads. Ontario, Canada.
27.
HancockJ.Watson-LampreyJ.AbrahamsonN. A.BommerJ. J.MarkatisA.McCoyE. and MendisR.2006An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using waveletsJournal of Earthquake Engineering1067–89.
28.
IbarraL. F.MedinaR. A. and KrawinklerH.2005Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deteriorationEarthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics341489–1511.
29.
IbarraL. F. and KrawinklerH.2005Global Collapse of Frame Structures under Seismic ExcitationsJohn A. Blume Earthquake Engineering CenterStanford, CA, 324 pp.
30.
JaiswalK.WaldD. J. and HearneM.2009Estimating Casualties for Large Worldwide Earthquakes using an Empirical Approach U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 1136.
JonkmanS. N.van GelderP. H. A. J. M. and VrijlingJ. K.2003An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damageJournal of Hazardous MaterialsA991–30.
33.
KemptonJ. J. and StewartJ. P.2006Prediction equations for significant duration of earthquake ground motions considering site and near-source effectsEarthquake Spectra22985–1013.
34.
KohrangiM.BazzurroP.VamvatsikosD. and SpillaturaA.2017Conditional spectrum-based ground motion record selection using average spectral accelerationEarthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics doi:10.1002/eqe.2876.
35.
KruiverP. P.van DedemE.RomijnR.de LangeG. L.KorffM.StafleuJ.GunnickJ. L.Rodriguez-MarekA.BommerJ. J.van ElkJ. and DoornhofD.2016An integrated shear-wave velocity model for the Groningen gas field, The Netherlands submitted to Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.
36.
LagomarsinoS.PennaA.GalascoA. and CattariS.2013TREMURI Program: an equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildingsEngineering Structures561787–1799.
37.
Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC)2013LS-DYNA - A general-purpose finite element program capable of simulating complex problemsLivermore, CA.
38.
LucoN. and CornellC. A.2007Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motionsEarthquake Spectra23357–392.
39.
McKennaF.FenvesG. L.ScottM. H. and JeremicB.2000Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees)Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research CenterUniversity of California, Berkeley, CA.
40.
MillerA. C. and RiceT. R.1983Discrete approximations of probability distributionsManagement Science29352–362.
MylonakisG.NikolaouS. and GazetasG.2006Footings under seismic loading: Analysis and design issues with emphasis on bridge foundationsSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering26824–853.
SamardjievaE. and BadalJ.2002Estimation of the expected number of casualties caused by strong earthquakesBulletin of Seismological Society of America922310–2322.
45.
SandıkkayaM. A.AkkarS. and BardP.-Y.2013A nonlinear site-amplification model for the next pan-European ground-motion prediction equationsBulletin of the Seismological Society of America10319–32.
SilvaV.CrowleyH.VarumH.PinhoR. and SousaR.2014Evaluation of analytical methodologies to derive vulnerability functionsEarthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics43181–204.
48.
SoE. K. M. and PomonisA.2012Derivation of globally applicable casualty rates for use in earthquake loss estimation modelsProceedings of 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, paper 1164.
49.
StaffordP. J.2008Conditional prediction of absolute durationsBulletin of Seismological Society of America981588–1594.
