Abstract
The increasing numbers of recordings at individual sites allows quantification of empirical linear site-response adjustment factors (δS2S s ) from the ground motion prediction equation (GMPE) residuals. The δS2S s are then used to linearly scale the ergodic GMPE predictions to obtain site-specific ground motion predictions in a partially non-ergodic Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment (PSHA). To address key statistical and conceptual issues in the current practice, we introduce a novel empirical region- and site-specific PSHA methodology wherein, (1) site-to-site variability (φS2S) is first estimated as a random-variance in a mixed-effects GMPE regression, (2) δS2S s at new sites with strong motion are estimated using the a priori φS2S, and (3) the GMPE site-specific single-site aleatory variability σ ss,s is replaced with a generic site-corrected aleatory variability σ0. Comparison of region- and site-specific hazard curves from our method against the traditional ergodic estimates at 225 sites in Europe and Middle East shows an approximate 50% difference in predicted ground motions over a range of hazard levels—a strong motivation to increase seismological monitoring of critical facilities and enrich regional ground motion data sets.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
