Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A simple test structure was designed and constructed to facilitate forced-vibration testing of a shallow foundation experiencing combined base shear and moment demands. The structure consists of a reinforced concrete foundation and top slab separated by steel columns that can be configured with braces. The slabs have a 2:1 aspect ratio in plan view to facilitate variable amount of overturning for shaking in orthogonal directions. The structure was transported to two field sites with representative shear-wave velocities of approximately V_S = 95 m/s and 190 m/s. At each site, the foundation slab was cast-in-place. Forced vibration testing was conducted over a wide range of frequencies and load levels to enable the evaluation of foundation-soil stiffness and damping behavior for linear and nonlinear conditions. The data collected to facilitate such analyses include acceleration, displacement, and foundation pressure records (data can be accessed at DOI: 10.4231/D3NK3658M, DOI: 10.4231/D3HT2GC4G, DOI: 10.4231/D3D21RK0N).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brandenberg

S. J.

Coe

Nigbor

R. L.

and Tanksley

2009. Different approaches for measuring ground strains during piledriving at a buried archeological site, J. Geotech. & Geoenvir. Eng. 135, 1101–1112.

Crouse

C. B.

Hushmand

Luco

J. E.

and Wong

H. L.

1990. Foundation impedance functions: Theory versus experiment, J. Geotech. Eng. 116, 432–449.

de Barros

F. C. P.

and Luco

J. E.

1995. Identification of foundation impedance functions and soil properties from vibration tests of the Hualien containment model, Soil Dyn. & Eqk. Eng. 14, 229–248.

Fadum

R. E.

1948. Influence values for estimating stresses in elastic foundations, Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Soil Mechs. and Foundn. Eng., Rotterdam, vol. 3, 77–84.

Givens

M. J.

2013. Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction of Instrumented Buildings and Test Structures, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.

Kinemetrics, Inc., 2005. EpiSensor, Force Balance Accelerometer, Model FBA ES-T, Pasadena, CA.

Lin

A. N.

and Jennings

P. C.

1984. Effect of embedment on foundation-soil impedances, J. Eng. Mech. 110, 1060–1075.

Luco

J. E.

and Wong

H. L.

1990. Forced vibration of the Lotung containment model: Theory and observations, J. Eng. Mech. 116, 845–861.

Luco

J. E.

and Westmann

R. A.

1971. Dynamic response of circular footings, J. of the Eng. Mech. Div. 97, 1381–1395.

10.

Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulations (NEEShub), 2012a. Mitigation of Collapse Risk in Vulnerable Concrete Buildings, Project NEES-2008-0637, available at https://nees.org/warehouse/project/637.

11.

Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulations (NEEShub), 2012b. Permanently Instrumented Field Sites, Project NEES-2007-0353, available at https://nees.org/warehouse/experiments/353.

12.

Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulations at University of California, Los Angeles (NEES@UCLA), 2012. Equipment, available at http://nees.ucla.edu/equipment.html.

13.

Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulations at University of California, Santa Barbara (NEES@UCSB), 2012. Wildlife Liquefaction Array and Garner Valley Downhole Array, available at http://nees.ucsb.edu/facilities/wla and http://nees.ucsb.edu/facilities/gvda.

14.

Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulations at University of Texas, Austin (NEES@ UTexas), 2012. Available at http://nees.utexas.edu/Equipment.shtml.

15.

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 2012. Soil-structure Interaction for Building Structures, Report No. NIST GCR 12-917-21, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.

16.

Paolucci

and Smerzini

2008. Earthquake-induced transient ground strains from dense seismic networks, Earthquake Spectra 24, 453–470.

17.

Reinert

E. T.

Brandenberg

S. J.

Stewart

J. P.

and Moss

R. E. S.

2012. Dynamic field test of a model levee founded on peaty organic soil using an eccentric mass shaker, 15^th World Conf. on E.Q. Eng., Lisbon, Portugal.

18.

Star

L. M.

2011. Seismic Vulnerability of Structures: Demand Characteristics and Field Testing to Evaluated Soil-Structure Interaction Effects, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.

19.

Steidl

J. H.

Youd

T. L.

and Nigbor

R. L.

2004. Research opportunities at the NEES permanently instrumented field sites, 13th World Conf. on E.Q. Eng. Vancouver B.C., Canada, 1–6 August 2004, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

20.

Steller

1996. New Borehole Geophysical Results at GVDA, available at http://nees.ucsb.edu/facilities/gvda.

21.

Stewart

J. P.

and Fenves

G. L.

1998. System identification for evaluating soil-structure interaction effects in buildings from strong motion recordings, Earthquake Engng. & Struct. Dyn. 27, 869–885.

22.

Stewart

J. P.

Fenves

G. L.

and Seed

R. B.

1999. Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings II: Empirical findings, J. Geotech. & Geoenv. Eng. 125, 38–48.

23.

Stokoe

K. H.

Kurtulus

and Menq

2004. Data Report Measurements at the NEES Garner Valley Test Site, California, University of Texas, Austin.

24.

Stokoe

K. H.

Lin

Menq

and Cox

B. R.

2010. Wildlife Refuge Liquefaction Field Site Shear Wave Velocity Measurements using Spectral-Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW) Test, NEES@UTexas Equipment Site, Austin, TX.

25.

Tang

H. T.

Tang

Y. K.

and Stepp

J. C.

1990. Lotung large-scale seismic experiment and soil-structure interaction method validation, Nucl. Eng. & Des. 123, 397–412.

26.

Tileylioglu

Stewart

J. P.

and Nigbor

R. L.

2011. Dynamic stiffness and damping of shallow foundation from forced vibration of a field test structure, J. Geotech. & Geoenv. Eng. 137, 344–353.

27.

Trifunac

M. D.

and Lee

V. W.

1996. Peak surface strains during strong earthquake motion, Soil Dyn. & Eqk. Eng, 15, 311–319.

28.

Veletsos

A. S.

and Wei

Y. T.

1971. Lateral and rocking vibrations of footings, J. of Soil Mech. & Foundns. Div. 97, 1227–1248.

29.

Wong

H. L.

and Luco

J. E.

1990. Seismic response of the Lotung containment model: Theory and observations, J. of Soil Mech. & Foundns. Div. 116, 1332–1350.

30.

Wong

H. L.

Trifunac

M. D.

and Luco

J. E.

1988. A comparison of soil-structure interaction calculations with results of full-scale forced vibration tests, Soil Dyn. & Eqk. Eng. 7, 22–31.

31.

Yamada

Hyodo

Orense

R. P.

Dinesh

S. V.

and Hyodo

2008. Strain-dependent dynamic properties of remolded sand-clay mixtures, J. of Geotech. & Geoenv. Eng. 134, 972–981.

32.

Youd

T. L.

and Holzer

T. L.

1994. Piezometer performance at wildlife liquefaction site, California, J. of Geotech. Eng. 120, 975–995.

33.

Youd

T. L.

Steidl

J. H.

and Nigbor

R. L.

2004a. Lessons learned and need for instrumented liquefaction sites, Soil Dyn. & Eqk. Eng. 24, 639–646.

34.

Youd

T. L.

Bartholomew

H. A. J.

and Proctor

J. S.

2004b. Geotechnical Logs and Data From Permanently Instrumented Sites: Garner Valley Downhole Array (GVDA) and Wildlife Liquefaction Array (WLA), University of California, Santa Barbara.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.23 MB

Field-Testing of Structure on Shallow Foundation to Evaluate Soil-Structure Interaction Effects

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material