The NGA-West2 research program, coordinated by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), is a major effort to produce refined models for predicting ground motion response spectra. This study presents new models for ground motion directionality developed as part of that project. Using a database of recorded ground motions, empirical models have been developed for a variety of quantities related to direction-dependent spectra. A model is proposed for the maximum spectral acceleration observed in any orientation of horizontal ground motion shaking (SaRotD100), which is formulated as a multiplicative factor to be coupled with the NGA-West2 models that predict the median spectral accelerations over all orientations (SaRotD50). Models are also proposed for the distribution of orientations of the SaRotD100 value, relative to the fault and the relationship between SaRotD100 orientations at differing periods. Discussion is provided regarding how these results can be applied to perform seismic hazard analysis and compute realistic target spectra conditioned on different parameters.
AbrahamsonN., AtkinsonG., BooreD., BozorgniaY., CampbellK., ChiouB. S.-J., IdrissI. M., SilvaW., and YoungsR., 2008. Comparisons of the NGA Ground motion relations, Earthquake Spectra24, 45–66.
4.
AbrahamsonN. A., SilvaW. J., and KamaiR., 2013. Update of the AS08 Ground-Motion Prediction Equations Based on the NGA-West2 Data Set, PEER Report No. 2013/04, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 143 pp.
5.
Al AtikL., AbrahamsonN., BommerJ. J., ScherbaumF., CottonF., and KuehnN., 2010. The variability of ground motion prediction models and its components, Seismological Research Letters81, 794–801.
6.
BakerJ. W., 2011. The conditional mean spectrum: a tool for ground motion selection, Journal of Structural Engineering137, 322–331.
7.
BakerJ. W., and CornellC. A., 2006. Which spectral acceleration are you using?Earthquake Spectra22, 293–312.
8.
BeyerK., and BommerJ. J., 2006. Relationships between median values and between aleatory variabilities for different definitions of the horizontal component of motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.96, 1512–1522.
9.
BooreD. M., 2010. Orientation-independent, nongeometric-mean measures of seismic intensity from two horizontal components of motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.100, 1830–1835.
10.
BooreD. M., and AtkinsonG. M., 2008. Ground motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s, Earthquake Spectra24, 99–138.
11.
BooreD. M., Watson-LampreyJ., and AbrahamsonN. A., 2006. Orientation-independent measures of ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.96, 1502–1511.
12.
BozorgniaY., AbrahamsonN., CampbellK., RowshandelB., and ShantzT., 2012. NGA-West2: A comprehensive research program to update ground motion prediction equations for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions, in 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 6 pp.
Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC), 2009. NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures (FEMA P-750), 2009 edition, Report prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C.
15.
CampbellK. W., and BozorgniaY., 2007. Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA Ground Motion Relations For the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of Peak and Spectral Ground Motion Parameters, PEER Report No. 2007/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, California. 238 pp.
16.
CampbellK. W., and BozorgniaY., 2008. NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear-elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 and 10.0 s, Earthquake Spectra24, 139–171.
17.
ChiouB. S.-J., DarraghR., GregorN., and SilvaW., 2008. NGA project strong-motion database, Earthquake Spectra24, 23–44.
18.
HastieT., TibshiraniR., and FriedmanJ. H., 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Springer, 533 pp.
19.
HongH. P., and GodaK., 2010. Characteristics of horizontal ground motion measures along principal directions, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration9, 9–22.
20.
HuangY., WhittakerA., and LucoN., 2010. Maximum Spectral Demand in the United States, USGS Open File Report, in preparation, 217 pp.
21.
HuangY., WhittakerA., and LucoN., 2008. Maximum spectral demands in the near-fault region, Earthquake Spectra24, 319–341.
22.
JayaramN., and BakerJ. W., 2008. Statistical tests of the joint distribution of spectral acceleration values, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.98, 2231–2243.
23.
KuboT., and PenzienJ., 1976. Time and Frequency Domain Analyses of Three-Dimensional Ground Motions, San Fernando Earthquakes, Report of Engineering Earthquake Research Center, EERC 76-6, University of California, Berkeley.
24.
KuboT., and PenzienJ., 1979. Analysis of three-dimensional strong ground motions along principal axes, San Fernando earthquake, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics7, 265–278.
25.
LohC. H., PenzienJ., and TsaiY. B., 1982. Engineering analyses of SMART 1 array accelerograms, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics10, 575–591.
26.
LopezO. A., and TorresR., 1997. The critical angle of seismic incidence and the maximum structural response, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics26, 881–894.
27.
LopezO. A., ChopraA. K., and HernandezJ. J., 2000. Critical response of structures to multicomponent earthquake excitation, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics29, 1759–1778.
28.
SearleS., 1971. Linear Models, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 560 pp.
29.
ShahiS. K., and BakerJ. W., 2013. NGA-West2 Models for Ground-Motion Directionality, PEER Report No. 2013/10, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 45 pp.
30.
SomervilleP. G., SmithN. F., GravesR. W., and AbrahamsonN. A., 1997. Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity, Seismological Research Letters68, 199–222.
31.
SpudichP., Watson-LampreyJ., SomervilleP., BaylessJ., ShahiS. K., BakerJ. W., RowshandelB., and ChiouB. S.-J., 2012. Directivity models produced for the Next Generation Attenuation West 2 (NGA-West 2) project, in Proceedings, 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 9 pp.
32.
StewartJ. P., AbrahamsonN. A., AtkinsonG. M., BakerJ., BooreD. M., BozorgniaY., CampbellK.W., ComartinC. D., IdrissI. M., LewM., MehrainM., MoehleJ. P., NaeimF., and SabolT. A., 2011. Representation of bi-directional ground motions for design spectra in building codes, Earthquake Spectra27, 927–937.
33.
Watson-LampreyJ., and BooreD. M., 2007. Beyond SaGMRotI: conversion to SaArb, SaSN, and SaMaxRot, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.97, 1511–1524.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
