The progressive damage and subsequent demolition of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings arising from the Canterbury earthquake sequence is reported. A dataset was compiled of all URM buildings located within the Christchurch CBD, including information on location, building characteristics, and damage levels after each major earthquake in this sequence. A general description of the overall damage and the hazard to both building occupants and to nearby pedestrians due to debris falling from URM buildings is presented with several case study buildings used to describe the accumulation of damage over the earthquake sequence. The benefit of seismic improvement techniques that had been installed to URM buildings is shown by the reduced damage ratios reported for increased levels of retrofit. Demolition statistics for URM buildings in the Christchurch CBD are also reported and discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1985. ATC-13: Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California, Redwood City, CA, 492.
2.
Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1992. ATC-31: Evaluation of the Performance for Seismically retrofitted buildings, Redwood City, CA, 75.
3.
BaileyS., DizhurD., TrowsdaleJ., GriffithM., and InghamJ. M., 2014. Performance of posttensioned seismic retrofit of two stone masonry buildings during the Canterbury earthquakes, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, accepted for publication.
4.
BradleyB. A., QuigleyM. C., Van DissenR. J., and LitchfieldN. J., 2013. Ground motion and seismic source aspects of the Canterbury earthquake sequence, Earthquake Spectra30, 1–15.
5.
BradleyB. A., and CubrinovskiM., 2011. Near source strong ground motions observed in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake, Bulletin of the NZSEE44, 181–194.
6.
BruneauM., 1995. Performance of masonry structures during the 1994 Northridge (Los Angeles) earthquake, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering22, 379–402.
7.
CabañasL., BenitoB., and HerráizM., 1997. An approach to the measurement of the potential structural damage of earthquake ground motions, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 26, 79–92.
8.
CampbellK. W., and BozorgniaY., 2012a. Cumulative absolute velocity (CAV) and seismic intensity based on the PEER-NGA database, Earthquake Spectra28, 457–485.
9.
CampbellK. W., and BozorgniaY., 2012b. A comparison of ground motion prediction equations for Arias intensity and cumulative absolute velocity developed using a consistent database and functional form database, Earthquake Spectra28, 931–941.
ColeG. L., DhakalR. P., and TurnerF. M., 2012. Building pounding damage observed in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics41, 893–913.
CousinsW. J., KingA. B., and KangaM., 2012. Accumulated losses from sequences of earthquakes: Implications for risk modeling, in Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 24–28 September 2012, Lisbon, Portugal.
14.
DizhurD., InghamJ. M., MoonL., GriffithM., SchultzA., SenaldiI., MagenesG., DickieJ., LisselS., CentenoJ., VenturaC., LeitiJ., and LourencoP., 2011. Performance of masonry buildings and churches in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake, Bulletin of the NZSEE44, 279–297.
15.
DizhurD., IsmailN., KnoxC., LumantarnaR., and InghamJ. M., 2010. Performance of unreinforced and retrofitted masonry buildings during the 2010 Darfield earthquake, Bulletin of the NZSEE43, 321–339.
16.
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), 1994. Expected Seismic Performance of Buildings, Ad Hoc Committee on Seismic Performance, Oakland, CA, 19 pp.
17.
InghamJ. M., BiggsD. T., and MoonL. M., 2011. How did unreinforced masonry buildings perform in the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake?, The Structural Engineer89(6), 14–18.
18.
InghamJ. M., and GriffithM. C., 2011a. Damage to unreinforced masonry structures by seismic activity, The Structural Engineer89(3), 14–15.
19.
InghamJ. M., and GriffithM. C., 2011b. Performance of unreinforced masonry buildings during the 2010 Darfield (Christchurch, NZ) earthquake, Australian Journal of Structural Engineering11, 207–224.
20.
InghamJ. M., and GriffithM. C., 2011c. The Performance of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings in the 2010–2011 Canterbury Earthquake Swarm, Commissioned report to the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Building Failure Caused by the Canterbury Earthquake.
21.
InghamJ. M., and GriffithM. C., 2011d. The Performance of Earthquake Strengthened URM Buildings in the Christchurch CBD in the 22 February 2011 Earthquake, Addendum report commissioned by Royal Commission of Inquiry into Building Failure Caused by the Canterbury Earthquake.
22.
LeiteJ., InghamJ. M., and LourencoP. B., 2013. Statistical assessment of damage to churches affected by the 2010–2011 by the Canterbury (New Zealand) earthquake sequence, Journal of Earthquake Engineering17, 73–97.
23.
LumantarnaR., 2012. Material characterisation of New Zealand's unreinforced masonry buildings, Doctoral dissertation, The University of Auckland, Auckland, NZ, 399 pp., available at https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/18879.
24.
LumantarnaR., BiggsD. T., and InghamJ. M., 2014a. Uniaxial compressive strength and stiffness of field extracted and laboratory constructed masonry prisms, ASCE Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 26, 567–575, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000731.
25.
LumantarnaR., BiggsD. T., and InghamJ. M., 2014b. Compressive, flexural bond and shear bond strengths of in-situ New Zealand unreinforced clay brick masonry constructed using lime mortar between the 1880s and 1940s, ASCE Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 26, 559–566, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000685.
26.
MoonL. M., GriffithM. C., InghamJ. M., and BiggsD. T., 2012. Review of transect of Christchurch CBD following 22 February 2011 earthquake, in 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper #4686, 24–28 September, Lisbon, Portugal.
27.
New Zealand Parliament, 2004. Building Act 2004, Department of Building and Housing—Te Tari Kaupapa Whare, Ministry of Economic Development, New Zealand Government, Wellington, NZ, Date of assent: 24 August 2004.
28.
New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE), 2006. Assessment and Improvement of the Structural Performance of Buildings in Earthquakes, Recommendations of a NZSEE Study Group on Earthquake Risk Buildings.
29.
SenaldiI., MagenesG., and InghamJ. M., 2013. Damage assessment of unreinforced stone masonry buildings after the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquakes, International Journal of Architectural Heritage, accepted for publication.
30.
Smokehouse Restaurant, 2009. Smokehouse, available at http://www.holysmoke.co.nz (retrieved 28 October 2010).
31.
Standards New Zealand, 2004. NZS 1170.5:2004, Structural Design Actions Part 5: Earthquake actions–New Zealand, Wellington, NZ.
32.
WailesC. D., and HornerA. C., 1933. Earthquake damage analyzed by Long Beach building officials, Engineering News-Record, 25 May 1933.
