The Tower of Pisa survived several strong earthquakes undamaged over the last 650 years, despite its leaning and limited strength and ductility. No credible explanation for its remarkable seismic performance exists to date. A reassessment of this unique case history in light of new seismological, geological, structural, and geotechnical information is reported, aiming to address this question. The following topics are discussed: (1) dynamic structural identification based on recorded earthquake data; (2) geophysical site characterization using a two-dimensional array; (3) seismic hazard and site response analysis considering horizontal and vertical motions; and (4) soil-structure interaction (SSI) analysis calibrated using lab and field data. A substantial shift in natural period, from about 0.35 s to over 1 s (a threefold increase, the largest known for a building of that height) caused by SSI, a wave parameter (1/σ) of about 0.3, and a minor effect of vertical ground motion are identified and may explain the lack of earthquake damage on the Tower. Recommendations for future research, including the need to establish a seismic bedrock deeper than 500 m, are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AcunzoG., PagliaroliA., and ScasserraG., 2014. In-Spector: Un software di supporto alla selezione di accelerogrammi naturali spettro-compatibili per analisi geotecniche e strutturali, in Proceedings, 33rd Conference of Gruppo Nazionale di Geofisica della Terra Solida, 107–114.
2.
AkkarS., and BommerJ. J., 2010. Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV, and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean region, and the Middle East, Seismological Research Letters81, 195–206.
3.
AnginaA., SteriA., StaculS., and Lo PrestiD., 2018. Free-field seismic response analysis: The Piazza dei Miracoli in Pisa case study, International Journal of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering9, 1–21.
4.
AtzeniC., BicciA., DeiD., FratiniM., and PieracciniM., 2010. Remote survey of the Leaning Tower of Pisa by interferometric sensing, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters7, 185–189.
5.
BartellettiR., FiorentinoG., LanzoG., LavoratoD., MaranoG. C., MontiG., NutiC., QuarantaG., and SquegliaN., 2016a. Behavior of the Leaning Tower of Pisa: Analysis of experimental data from structural dynamic monitoring, Applied Mechanics and Materials847, 445–453.
6.
BartellettiR., FiorentinoG., LanzoG., LavoratoD., MaranoG. C., MontiG., NutiC., QuarantaG., SabettaF., and SquegliaN., 2016b. Behavior of the Leaning Tower of Pisa: Insights on seismic input and soil-structure interaction, Applied Mechanics and Materials847, 454–462.
7.
BommerJ. J., and AbrahamsonN. A., 2006. Why do modern probabilistic seismic-hazard analyses often lead to increased hazard estimates?Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America96, 1967–1977.
8.
BommerJ. J., and AcevedoA. B., 2004. The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis, Journal of Earthquake Engineering8, 43–91.
9.
BurlandJ. B., JamiolkowskiM., SquegliaN., and ViggianiC., 2013. The Leaning Tower of Pisa, in Geotechnics and Heritage: Case Histories (BilottaE., FloraA., LirerS., and ViggianiC., eds.), CRC Press, London, United Kingdom, 207–227.
10.
BurlandJ. B., JamiolkowskiM. B., and ViggianiC., 2009. Leaning Tower of Pisa: Behavior after stabilization operations, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories3, 156–169.
11.
CaponJ., 1969. High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis, Proceedings of the IEEE57, 1408–1418.
12.
CastellaroS., and MulargiaF., 2010. How far from a building does the ground-motion free-field start?The cases of three famous towers and a modern building, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America100, 2080–2094.
13.
Cestelli GuidiC., CroceA., SkemptonA. W., SchultzeE., CalabresiG., and ViggianiC., 1971. Caratteristiche geotecniche del sottosuolo della Torre, Ricerche e Studi Sulla Torre Pendente di Pisa ed i Fenomeni Connessi Alle Condizioni D'ambiente1, 179–200.
14.
Consorzio Progetto Torre di Pisa, 1996. Rilevamento architettonico della Piazza dei Miracoli e della Torre di Pisa, Operazioni di carattere conoscitivo, progettazione esecutiva e realizzazione degli interventi sulla Torre di Pisa, Comitato per gli interventi di consolidamento e restauro della Torre di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
15.
Consorzio Progetto Torre di Pisa, 2000. Esecuzione di prova geofisica Cross Hole nella Piazza del Duomo – Pisa, Comitato per gli interventi di consolidamento e restauro della Torre di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
16.
Consorzio Progetto Torre di Pisa, 2001. Ripristino del fondo del Catino e sua Connessione con la Torre, Comitato per gli interventi di consolidamento e restauro della Torre di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
17.
CresyE., and TaylorG. L., 1829. Architecture of the Middle Ages in Italy: Illustrated by Views, Plans, Elevations, Sections and Details of the Cathedral, Baptistry, Leaning Tower of Campanile and Campo Santo at Pisa from Drawings and Measurements Taken in the Year 1817: Accompanied by Descriptive Accounts of Their History and Construction, London, United Kingdom.
18.
D'EliaB., LanzoG., and PagliaroliA., 2003. Small-strain stiffness and damping of soils in a direct simple shear device, Paper No. 111, in Proceedings, 2003 Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 13–15 February 2003, Christchurch, New Zealand.
19.
DarendeliM. B., 2001. Development of a New Family of Normalized Modulus Reduction and Material Damping Curves, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
20.
DesideriA., RussoG., and ViggianiC., 1997. La stabilità di torri su terreno deformabile, Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica1, 5–29 (in Italian).
21.
European Committee for Standardization, 2004. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, BS EN 1998-1, Brussels, Belgium.
22.
FiorentinoG., LavoratoD., QuarantaG., PagliaroliA., CarlucciG., NutiC., SabettaF., Della MonicaG., PiersantiM., LanzoG., MaranoG. C., MontiG., SquegliaN., and BartellettiR., 2017. Numerical and experimental analysis of the Leaning Tower of Pisa under earthquake, Procedia Engineering199, 3350–3355.
23.
FiorentinoG., NutiC., SquegliaN., LavoratoD., and StaculS., 2018a. One-dimensional nonlinear seismic response analysis using strength-controlled constitutive models: The case of the Leaning Tower of Pisa's subsoil, Geosciences8, 228.
24.
FiorentinoG., LavoratoD., QuarantaG., PagliaroliA., CarlucciG., MylonakisG., SquegliaN., BriseghellaB., MontiG., and NutiC., 2018b. Leaning Tower of Pisa: Recent studies on dynamic response and soil-structure interaction, Paper No. 11588, in Proceedings of the 16th European Conference of Earthquake Engineering (16ECEE), 18–21 June, 2018, Thessaloniki, Greece.
25.
GivensM. J., MylonakisG., and StewartJ. P., 2016. Modular analytical solutions for foundation damping in soil-structure interaction applications, Earthquake Spectra32, 1749–1768.
26.
GrandoriG., and FaccioliE., 1993. Studio per la Definizione del Terremoto di Verifica per le Analisi Sulla Torre di Pisa – Relazione Finale, Comitato per gli interventi di consolidamento e restauro della Torre di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
27.
GrandoriG., FaccioliE., and PaolucciR., 1999. Approfondimento Degli Studi sul Problema Sismico, Comitato per gli interventi di consolidamento e restauro della Torre di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
28.
Gruppo di Lavoro CPTI, 2004. Catalogo Parametrico dei Terremoti Italiani (CPTI), versione 2004 (CPTI04), INGV, Bologna, Italy, http://doi.org/10.6092/INGV.IT-CPTI04.
29.
Gruppo di Lavoro MPS, 2004. Redazione della mappa di pericolosità sismica prevista dall'Ordinanza PCM 3274 del 20 marzo 2003, Rapporto conclusivo per il dipartimento di Protezione Civile, INGV, Milano, Roma, 65 pp. +5 appendixes, available at http://zonesismiche.mi.ingv.it/documenti/rapporto_conclusivo.pdf (in Italian).
30.
HudsonM., IdrissI. M., and BeikaeM., 1994. QUAD4M: A Computer Program to Evaluate the Seismic Response of Soil Structures Using Finite Element Procedures and Incorporating a Compliant Base, University of California, Davis.
31.
ImpavidoM., LancellottaR., Lo PrestiD., and PallaraR., 1993. Esecuzione di Prove Relative alla Caratterizzazione del Comportamento Meccanico Dell'argilla di Pisa. Rapporto di Ricerca 2.10, Prove di Colonna Risonante, Contratto di Ricerca Politecnico di Torino-Consorzio Torre di Pisa.
32.
Istituto Sperimentale Modelli e Strutture, 1992. Modellazione Numerica Della Struttura Della Torre – Calibrazione Dello Stick Model Dell'elevazione e Analisi a Spettro di Risposta, Comitato per gli interventi di consolidamento e restauro della Torre di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
33.
KarimiZ., BullockZ., DashtiS., LielA., and PorterK., 2017. Influence of soil and structural parameters on liquefaction-induced settlement of foundations, in Proceedings, 3rd International Conference on Performance-Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (PBD-III), 16–19 July, 2016, Vancouver, Canada.
34.
KramerS. L., SiderasS. S., and GreenfieldM. W., 2016. The timing of liquefaction and its utility in liquefaction hazard evaluation, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering91, 133–146.
35.
KottkeA. R., WangX., and RathjeE. M., 2013. Technical Manual for STRATA, University of Texas, Austin.
36.
LermoJ., and Chávez-GarcíaF. J., 1993. Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America83, 1574–1594.
37.
LiuT., ZhangQ., ZordanT., and BriseghellaB., 2016. Finite element model updating of Canonica Bridge using experimental modal data and genetic algorithm, Structural Engineering International26, 27–36.
38.
LuziL., PugliaR., and RussoE., and ORFEUS WG5, 2016. Engineering Strong Motion Database, version 1.0, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Observatories and Research Facilities for European Seismology, http://doi.org/10.13127/ESM.
39.
MacchiG., and GhelfiS., 2005. Problemi di Consolidamento Strutturale in La Torre di Pisa – Gli studi e gli interventi che hanno consentito la stabilizzazione della Torre di Pisa, Bollettino d'Arte3, 236.
40.
MaranoG. C., QuarantaG., and MontiG., 2011. Modified genetic algorithm for the dynamic identification of structural systems using incomplete measurements, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering26, 92–110.
41.
MaravasA., MylonakisG., and KarabalisD., 2014. Simplified discrete systems for dynamic analysis of structures on footings and piles, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering61–62, 29–39.
42.
MargottiniC., MolinD., and ServaL., 1992. Intensity vs. ground motion: A new approach using Italian data, Engineering Geology33, 45–58.
43.
MelettiC., GaladiniF., ValensiseG., StucchiM., BasiliR., BarbaS., VannucciG., BoschiE., 2008. A seismic source zone model for the seismic hazard assessment of the Italian territory, Tectonophysics450, 85–108.
44.
MontiG., QuarantaG., and MaranoG. C., 2010. Genetic-algorithm-based strategies for dynamic identification of nonlinear systems with noise-corrupted response, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering24, 173–187.
45.
MylonakisG., NikolaouS., and GazetasG., 2006. Footings under seismic loading: Analysis and design issues with emphasis on bridge foundations, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering26, 824–853.
46.
NakamuraY., 1989. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using micro-tremor on the ground surface, Quarterly Report of RTRI30, 25–33.
47.
NakamuraY., 2000. Clear identification of fundamental idea of Nakamura's technique and its applications, in Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Silverstream, New Zealand.
48.
NakamuraY., GurlerE. D., and SaitaJ., 1999. Dynamic characteristics of Leaning Tower of Pisa using microtremor – Preliminary results, Proceedings of the 25th JSCE Earthquake Engineering Symposium, Doboku Gakkai, Tokyo, Japan25, 921–924.
49.
National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) Consultants Joint Venture, 2012. Soil Structure Interaction for Building Structures, NIST GCR 12-917-21, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
50.
OrdazM., ArboledaJ., and SinghS. K., 1995. A scheme of random summation of an empirical Green's function to estimate ground motions from future large earthquakes, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America85, 1635–1647.
51.
OrdazM., MartinelliF., AguilarA., ArboledaJ., MelettiC., and D'AmicoV., 2014. CRISIS 2014 – Program for Computing Seismic Hazard, available at http://www.r-crisis.com/about/crisis/.
52.
PillaL., 1846. Istoria del Tremuoto che ha Devastato i Paesi Della Costa Toscana il dì 14 Agosto 1846, R.Vannucchi Pisa.
53.
PostpischlD., StucchiM., and BellaniA., 1991. Some ideas for a databank of macroseismic data, Tectonophysics193, 215–223.
54.
RampelloS., and CallistoL., 1998. A study on the subsoil of the Tower of Pisa based on results from standard and high-quality samples, Canadian Geotechnical Journal35, 1074–1092.
55.
RollinsK. M., EvansM. D., DiehlN. B., and DailyW. D.III, 1998. Shear modulus and damping relationships for gravels, Journal of Geotechnical Geoenvironmental124, 396–405.
56.
RovidaA., LocatiM., CamassiR., LolliB., and GasperiniP. (eds.), 2016. CPTI15, Parametric Catalogue of Italian Earthquakes 2015, available at http://emidius.mi.ingv.it/CPTI15-DBMI15 (last accessed 10 October 2018).
57.
SabettaF., 2014. Seismic hazard and design earthquakes for the central archaeological area of Rome, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering12, 1307–1317.
58.
SabettaF., LucantoniA., BungumH., and BommerJ. J., 2005. Sensitivity of PSHA results to ground-motion prediction relations and logic-tree weights, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering25, 317–329.
59.
SambridgeM., 1999. Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm—II. Appraising the ensemble, Geophysical Journal International138, 727–746.
60.
SESAME, 2004. Processing Report on the Multiplatform H/V Processing Software J-SESAME, European research project WP03 – Deliverable D09.03.
61.
SESAME, 2005. Site Effects Assessment Using Ambient Excitations, Recommendations for Quality Array Measurements and Processing, SESAME European research project WP13 – Deliverable D24.13, available at http://sesame.geopsy.org/Delivrables/Del-D24-Wp13.pdf.
62.
SquegliaN., and BentivoglioG., 2014. Role of monitoring in historical building restoration: The case of Leaning Tower of Pisa, International Journal of Architectural Heritage9, 38–47.
63.
StarL. M., TileyliogluS., GivensM. J., MylonakisG., and StewartJ. P., 2019. Evaluation of soil-structure interaction effects from system identification of structures subject to forced vibration tests, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering116, 747–760.
64.
StewartJ. P., and FenvesG. L., 1998. System identification for evaluating soil–structure interaction effects in buildings from strong motion recordings, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics27, 869–885.
65.
StewartJ. P., FenvesG. L., and SeedR. B., 1999a. Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. I: Analytical methods, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering125, 26–37.
66.
StewartJ. P., SeedR. B., and FenvesG. L., 1999b. Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. II: Empirical findings, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering125, 38–48.
67.
SunH., and BüyüköztürkO., 2018. The MIT Green Building benchmark problem for structural health monitoring of tall buildings, Structural Control and Health Monitoring25, e2115.
68.
TokimatsuK., 1995. Geotechnical site characterization using surface waves, in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (IshiharaK., ed.), A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 1333–1368.
69.
VeletsosA. S., and WeiY. T., 1971. Lateral and rocking vibration of footings, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division97, 1227–1248.
70.
VeletsosA. S., and MeekJ. W., 1974. Dynamic behavior of building-foundation systems, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics3, 121–138.
71.
ViggianiC., and PepeM. C., 2005. Il sottosuolo della Torre in La Torre di Pisa – Gli studi e gli interventi che hanno consentito la stabilizzazione della Torre di Pisa, Bollettino d'Arte2, 1–37.
72.
WatheletM., JongmansD., and OhrnbergerM., 2004. Surface-wave inversion using a direct search algorithm and its application to ambient vibration measurements, Near Surface Geophysics2, 211–221.
73.
YoshidaN., 2015. Seismic Ground Response Analysis, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 365 pp.
