Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study was prompted by the recent availability of a significant amount of openly accessible measured V_S30 values and the desire to investigate the trend of using proxy-based models to predict V_S30 in the absence of measurements. Comparisons between measured and model-based values were performed. The measured data included 503 V_S30 values collected from various projects for 482 seismographic station sites in California. Six proxy-based models—employing geologic mapping, topographic slope, and terrain classification—were also considered. Included was a new terrain class model based on the Yong et al. (2012) approach but recalibrated with updated measured V_S30 values. Using the measured V_S30 data as the metric for performance, the predictive capabilities of the six models were determined to be statistically indistinguishable. This study also found three models that tend to underpredict V_S30 at lower velocities (NEHRP Site Classes D–E) and overpredict at higher velocities (Site Classes B–C).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrahamson

Atkinson

Boore

Bozorgnia

Campbell

Chiou

Idriss

I. M.

Silva

and Youngs

2008. Comparisons of the NGA ground-motion relations, Earthquake Spectra 24(1), 45–66.

Abrahamson

and Shedlock

K. M.

1997. Overview, Seismological Research Letters 68(1), 9–23.

Allen

T. I.

and Wald

D. J.

2009. On the use of high-resolution topographic data as a proxy for seismic site conditions (V_S30), Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 99(2A), 935–943.

Ancheta

T. D.

Darragh

R. B.

Stewart

J. P.

Seyhan

Silva

W. J.

Chiou

B. S. J.

Woodell

K. E.

Graves

R. W.

Kottke

A. R.

Boore

D. M.

Kishida

and Donahue

J. L.

2013. PEER NGA-West2 Database, PEER Technical Report No. 2013/03, Berkeley, CA 170 p.

Anderson

J. G.

Lee

Zeng

and Day

1996. Control of strong motion by the upper 30 meters, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 86(6), 1749–1759.

Asten

M. W.

and Boore

D.M.

2005. Comparison of Shear-Velocity Profiles of Unconsolidated Sediments Near the Coyote Borehole (CCOC) Measured with Fourteen Invasive and Noninvasive Methods, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2005-1169, 5 pp, available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1169/chapters/of2005-1169_part1_Asten.pdf (last accessed 15 August 2013).

Boore

D. M.

2004. Estimating V¯_S(30) (or NEHRP Site Classes) from shallow velocity models (depths < 30 m), Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94(2), 591–597.

Boore

D. M.

Thompson

E. M.

and Cadet

2011. Regional correlations of V_S30 and velocities averaged over depths less than and greater than 30 meters, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 101(6), 3046–3059.

Boore

D. M.

Joyner

W. B.

and Fumal

T. E.

1993. Estimation of Response Spectra and Peak Accelerations from Western North American Earthquakes: An Interim Report, Part 1, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 93-509, Menlo Park, CA, 69 pp.

10.

Boore

D. M.

Joyner

W. B.

and Fumal

T. E.

1997. Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: A summary of recent work, Seismological Research Letters 68(1), 128–153.

11.

Borcherdt

R. D.

1970. Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 60(1), 29–61.

12.

Borcherdt

R. D.

1994. Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification), Earthquake Spectra, 10(4), 617–653.

13.

Borcherdt

R. D.

and Glassmoyer

1992. On the characteristics of local geology and their influence on ground motions generated by the Loma Prieta earthquake in the San Francisco Bay region, California, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 82(2), 603–641.

14.

Borradaile

2003. Statistics of Earthscience Data: Their Distribution in Time, Space and Orientation, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 351 pp.

15.

Bragato

P. L.

2008. Limits for the improvement of ground-motion relations in Europe and the Middle East by accounting for site effects, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98(4), 2061–2065.

16.

Brown

M. B.

and Forsythe

A. B.

1974. Robust tests for equality of variances, Journal of the American Statistics Association 69, 364–367.

17.

Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC), 2003. Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Part 1: Provisions, Technical Report FEMA-450, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 303 pp.

18.

Castellaro

Mulargia

and Rossi

P. L.

2008. V_S30: Proxy for seismic amplification? Seismological Research Letters 79(4), 540–543.

19.

Chiou

Darragh

Gregor

and Silva

2008. NGA project strong-motion database, Earthquake Spectra 24(1), 23–44.

20.

Dobry

Borcherdt

R. D.

Crouse

C. B.

Idriss

I. M.

Joyner

W. B.

Martin

G. R.

Power

M. S.

Rinne

E. E.

and Seed

R. B.

2000. New site coefficients and site classification system used in recent building seismic code provisions, Earthquake Spectra 16(1), 41–67.

21.

Eurocode 8, 2004. EN 1998-1: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), available at http://www.cen.eu/cenorm/homepage.htm (last accessed 18 September 2012).

22.

Farr

T. G.

and Kobrick

2000. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission produces a wealth of data, Eos 81(48), 583–585.

23.

Fisher

R. A.

1935. The Design of Experiments, Hafner, New York.

24.

Fox

and Weisberg

2011. An R Companion to Applied Regression, 2nd Edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 449 pp.

25.

Fumal

T. E.

and Tinsley

J. C.

1985. Mapping shear-wave velocities in the near-surface geological materials, in Evaluating Earthquake Hazards in the Los Angeles Region—An Earth Science Perspective ( Ziony

J. I.

, ed.), U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 81-1360, Menlo Park, CA, 127–151.

26.

Geisser

1993. Predictive Inference: An Introduction, Chapman and Hall, New York, 264 pp.

27.

Holzer

T. L.

Padovani

A. C.

Bennett

M. J.

Noce

T. E.

and Tinsley

J. C.

III , Mapping NEHRP V_S30 Site Classes, Earthquake Spectra 21(2), 353–370.

28.

Iwahashi

and Pike

R. J.

2007. Automated classifications of topography from DEMs by an unsupervised nested-means algorithm and a three-part geometric signature, Geomorphology 86, 409–440.

29.

Komsta

and Novomestky

2012. Moments: Moments, cumulants, skewness, kurtosis and related tests, R Project for Statistical Computing, available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/moments/index.html, (last accessed 13 May 2014).

30.

Lee

V. W.

and Trifunac

M. D.

2010. Should average shear-wave velocity and the top 30 m of soil be used to describe seismic amplification?, Soil Dynamics in Earthquake Engineering 30, 1250–1258.

31.

Levene

1960. Robust tests for equality of variances, in Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling ( Olkin

et al., eds.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 278–292.

32.

Louie

J. N.

2001. Faster, Better: Shear-Wave Velocity to 100 Meters Depth from Refraction Microtremor Arrays, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 91(2), 347–364.

33.

Louie

J. N.

2005. Improving Next-Generation Attenuation Models with Shear-Velocity Measurements at All Trinet and Strong-Motion Stations in LA, NEHRP Final Technical Report 05HZGR0078, 43 pp, available at http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/external/research.php (last accessed 15 August 2013).

34.

Louie

J. N.

2007. Shear-Wave Velocity Map for California: Collaborative Research with CGS and UNR, NEHRP Final Technical Report 07HQGR0029, 98 pp, available at http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/external/research.php (last access 15 August 2013).

35.

Louie

J. N.

Mayo

Hauksson

Reynolds

and Hall-Patton

2011. Shear-Velocity Measurements at CISN Stations along the Southern San Andreas Fault, NEHRP Final Technical Report G09AP00050, 98 pp, available at http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/external/research.php://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/external/research.php (last accessed 15 August 2013).

36.

Moss

R. E.

2008. Quantifying measurement uncertainty of thirty-meter shear-wave velocity, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98(3), 1399–1411.

37.

Mucciarelli

and Gallipoli

M. R.

2006. Comparison between V_S30 and other estimates of site amplification in Italy, Paper No. 270, in First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, a Joint Event of the 13th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and 30th General Assembly of the European Seismological Commission, 3–8 September, 2006, Geneva, available from http://www.earth-prints.org/handle/2122/1945 (last accessed 18 September 2012).

38.

Nigbor

R. L.

and Swift

J. N.

2001. Resolution of Site Response Issues in the Northridge Earthquake (ROSRINE): Data Collection, Processing and Dissemination from Phase 5b Field and Laboratory Investigations, USC Technical Report USC-01-Rev. 0.9, Los Angeles, CA, 144 pp.

39.

NIST/SEMATECH, 2003. e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, available at http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/ (last accessed 12 May 2014).

40.

Park

and Elrich

1998. Predictions of shear-wave velocities in Southern California using surface geology, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 88(3), 677–685.

41.

R Core Team, 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, available from http://www.R-project.org (last accessed 2 September 2014).

42.

Seyhan

Stewart

J. P.

Ancheta

T. D.

Darragh

R. B.

and Graves

R. W.

2014. NGA-West2 site database, Earthquake Spectra 30, 1007–1024.

43.

Stokoe

and Lin

2003. Application of SASW to US SMA Sites, PEER Final Project Summary 2C01, Berkeley, CA, 2 pp.

44.

Thompson

E. M.

and Wald

D. J.

2012. Developing V_S30 site-condition maps by combining observations with geologic and topographic constraints, in Proceedings 15^th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 24–28 September, 2012, Lisbon, 9 pp.

45.

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), 2015. Earthquake Hazards Program Web site, available at http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/apps/vs30/ (last accessed 17 December 2015).

46.

Wald

Lin

K. W.

Porter

and Turner

2008. ShakeCast: Automating and improving the use of ShakeMap for post-earthquake decision-making and response, Earthquake Spectra 24(2), 533–553.

47.

Wald

D. J.

Quitoriano

Heaton

T. H.

Kanamori

Scrivner

C. W.

and Worden

C. B.

1999. TriNet “ShakeMaps”: Rapid generation of peak ground motion and intensity maps for earthquakes in southern California, Earthquake Spectra 15(3), 537–555.

48.

Wald

D. J.

and Allen

T. I.

2007. Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site conditions and amplification, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 97(5), 1379–1395.

49.

Warnes

G. R.

2004. Plot x-y Points with Locally Smoothed Mean and Standard Deviation, available at http://rss.acs.unt.edu/Rdoc/library/gplots/html/bandplot.html (last accessed April 2009).

50.

Wills

C. J.

1998. Differences in shear-wave velocity due to measurement methods: a cautionary note, Seismological Research Letters 69(3), 216–221.

51.

Wills

C. J.

Petersen

Bryant

W. A.

Reichle

Saucedo

G. J.

Tan

Taylor

and Treiman

2000. A site-conditions map for California based on geology and shear-wave velocity, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90(6B), S187–S208.

52.

Wills

C. J.

and Clahan

K. B.

2006. Developing a map of geologically defined site-condition categories for California, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 96(4A), 1483–1501.

53.

Wills

C. J.

and Guiterrez

2008. Investigation of Geographic Rules for Improving Site-Conditions Mapping, NEHRP Final Technical Report 07HQGR0061, Reston, VA, 20 pp.

54.

Wills

C. J.

and Silva

1998. Shear-wave velocity characteristics of geologic units in California, Earthquake Spectra 14(3), 533–556.

55.

Yong

Hough

S. E.

Iwahashi

and Braverman

2012. A terrain-based site-conditions map of California with implications for the contiguous United States, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 102(1), 114–128.

56.

Yong

Martin

Stokoe

and Diehl

2013. ARRA-Funded V_S30 Measurements using Multi-Technique Approach at Strong-Motion Stations in California and Central-Eastern United States, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013-1102, 59 pp., available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2013/1102/ (last accessed 15 August 2013).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB

Comparison of Measured and Proxy-Based V S 30 Values in California

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material