The 23 October 2011 M W 7.0 Van (Eastern Turkey) Earthquake: Interpretations of Recorded Strong Ground Motions and Post-Earthquake Conditions of Nearby Structures
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2014
The 23 October 2011 M W 7.0 Van (Eastern Turkey) Earthquake: Interpretations of Recorded Strong Ground Motions and Post-Earthquake Conditions of Nearby Structures
A major thrust-fault earthquake of MW = 7.0 occurred on 23 October 2011 at 10:41:21 UTC in the eastern Anatolian region of Turkey, severely affecting the nearby towns of Van and Erciş. In this study, a few strong-motion records from the epicentral area are analyzed in order to investigate the characteristics of the ground motions. Also reported are the post-earthquake field observations for various types of structures, such as buildings, bridges, historical structures, tunnels, and dams within the vicinity of the fault plane. The spatial distribution of damage indicates a noticeable hanging-wall effect. The special-type structures are observed to experience far less damage, as opposed to the building structures in the region pointing to the need for strict compliance to seismic building code and the corresponding construction requirements.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamsonN. A., and SomervilleP. G., 1996. Effects of the hanging wall and footwall on ground motions recorded during the Northridge earthquake, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America86, S93–S99.
2.
AkkarS., and BommerJ. J., 2006. Influence of long-period filter cut-off on elastic spectral displacements, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics35, 1145–1165.
3.
AkkarS., and BommerJ. J., 2010. Empirical Equations for the Prediction of PGA, PGV and Spectral Accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region and the Middle East, Seismological Research Letters81, 195–206.
4.
AkkarS., and CagnanZ., 2010. A local ground-motion predictive model for Turkey and its comparison with other regional and global ground-motion models, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America100, 2978–2995.
5.
AkkarS., KaleO., YenierE., and BommerJ. J., 2011. The high-frequency limit of usable response spectral ordinates from filtered analogue and digital strong-motion accelerograms, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics40, 1387–1401.
6.
AmbraseysN. N., 2009. Earthquakes in the Mediterranean and Middle East: A Multidisciplin-ary Study of Seismicity up to 1900, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 968 pp.
7.
AmbraseysN. N., and JacksonJ. A., 1998. Faulting associated with historical and recent earthquakes in the Eastern Mediterranean region, Geophysical Journal International133, 390–406.
8.
Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1996. Improved Seismic Design Criteria for California Bridges: Resource Document, California Department of Transportation, Redwood, CA.
9.
Boğaziçi University, 2011. 23 October 2011 Van Earthquake (MW = 7.2) Assessment Report (in Turkish), available at http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/sismo/.
10.
Boğaziçi University, 2012. National Earthquake Monitoring Centre, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, available at http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/sismo/.
11.
BooreD. M., and AtkinsonG. M., 2008. Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s, Earthquake Spectra24, 99–138.
12.
Center for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology (CEDIM) Forensic Earthquake Analysis Group, 2011. Report #4, Comparing the Current Impact of the Van Earthquake to Past Earthquakes in Eastern Turkey, 2 November 2011, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - German Research Centre for Geoscience and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.
13.
ElnashaiA. S., et al., 2010. The Maule (Chile) Earthquake of February 27, 2010 Consequence Assessment and Case Studies, MAE Center Report No. 10-04, Mid-America Earthquake Center.
GokR., TurkelliN., SandvolE., SeberD., and BarazangiM., 2000. Regional wave propagation in Turkey and surrounding regions, Geophysical Research Letters27, 429–432.
16.
GülkanP., GürpınarA., CelebiM., ArpatE., and GencoğluS., 1978. Engineering Report on the Muradiye-Çaldıran, Turkey, Earthquake of 24 November 1976, National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C.
17.
KalkanE., and GülkanP., 2004. Empirical attenuation equations for vertical ground motion in Turkey, Earthquake Spectra20, 853–882.
18.
KonnoK., and OhmachiT., 1998. Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America88, 228–241.
19.
LermoJ., and Chavez-GarciaF. J., 1993. Site effect evaluation using spectral ratio with only one station, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America83, 1574–1594.
20.
Middle East Technical University–Earthquake Engineering Research Center (METU-EERC), 2011. 23 October 2011 (Mw = 7.2) Van Earthquake: Field Observations on Seismicity and Structural Damage, Report: METU/EERC 2011-04 (in Turkish), available at http://www.metu.edu.tr/sites/default/files/VanRapor_v1.6_small.pdf.
21.
MoroniO., and GomezC., 2002a. Concrete shear wall building. WHE Report 4 (Chile), World Housing Encyclopedia (www.world-housing.net), Earthquake Engineering Research Institute and International Association for Earthquake Engineering, Oakland, CA.
22.
MoroniO., and GomezC., 2002b. Concrete frame and shear wall building. WHE Report 6 (Chile), World Housing Encyclopedia (www.world-housing.net), Earthquake Engineering Research Institute and International Association for Earthquake Engineering, Oakland, CA.
23.
MurtyC. V. R., BrzevS., FaisonH., ComartinC. D., and IrfanogluA., 2006. AT RISK: The Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings with Masonry Infill Walls, Publication Number WHE-2006-03, World Housing Encyclopedia (www.world-housing.net) Earthquake Engineering Research Institute and International Association for Earthquake Engineering, Oakland, CA.
24.
NakamuraY., 1989. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using micro-tremor on the ground surface, Quarterly Report of the Railway Technology Research Institute30, 25–30.
25.
Quantum GIS Development Team, 2012. Quantum GIS Geographic Information System, Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project, available at http://qgis.osgeo.org.
26.
RahnamaM., 2011. The 2010 Maule, Chile Earthquake: Lessons and Future Challenges, Risk Management Solutions, Inc.
27.
SelcukL., Saglam SelcukA., and BeyazT., 2010. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Lake Van basin, Turkey. Nat Hazards54, 949–965.
28.
ŞaroğluF., EmreÖ., and Kuşçuİ., 1992. Active Fault Map of Turkey, Mineral Res. Explor. Inst. Turkey.
29.
SengörC., ÖzerenM. S., KeskinM., ŞakinçM., ÖzbakırA. D., and Kayanİ., 2008. Eastern Turkish high plateau as a small Turkic-type orogen: Implications for post-collisional crust-forming processes in Turkic-type orogens, Earth-Science Reviews90, 1–48.
30.
Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC), 2007. Specification for Structures to Be Built in Disaster Areas, Turkish Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey.
31.
Turkish General Directorate of Highways, 2009. Historic Bridges Restoration Inventory, available at http://www.kgm.gov.tr.
32.
UlusayR., TuncayE., SonmezH., and GokceogluC., 2004. An attenuation based on Turkish strong motion data and iso-acceleration map of Turkey, Eng. Geol. 74, 265–291.
