Abstract
In this piece of critical, interdisciplinary and situated legal scholarship the author explores the implications of the material practices and institutional constraints that shape the place of Legal Writing and its professoriate in contemporary US legal education, and draws lessons from both the history of Rhetoric and Composition Studies and that of US legal education in seeking ways to address the gendered employment discrimination characteristically experienced by teachers of Legal Writing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.