Background The Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET), a randomized, multicenter clinical trial of myopia progression in children, had an exceptionally high retention rate of 98.5% (462/469) at three years of follow-up. The present investigation was designed to evaluate and compare the reasons for COMET's high retention rate according to participating families and clinical center staff.
Methods Families (n = 411) and staff (n = 35) completed a confidential 19-item questionnaire by indicating families' levels of preference for each item, and rating its importance in keeping families in the study. The questionnaire evaluated study features in four categories: staff characteristics, operational aspects, specific study elements, and incentives.
Results Results showed that most families viewed the study very favorably. Features that appealed to 90% or more families and promoted continued study participation included staff attributes such as friendliness, responsiveness and encouragement, and aspects pertaining to standard of care such as completeness of eye exam, quality of eye care and free eyeglasses. Compared to families, staff tended to underestimate the importance of the following features for retention: seeing the same staff at each visit, appointment reminders, center location, newsletters, commitment to the study, being part of a nationwide study, length of the study, association with a college of optometry, completeness of eye exam, and eye drops (p < 0.05 by chi-square analyses). However, staff responses also revealed less preferred components of the study protocol (e.g., eye drops), to which families might have been reluctant to respond unfavorably.
Conclusions Our findings highlight the importance of intangible factors such as staff attributes and participants' study commitment in maintaining high retention rates, and the usefulness of surveying both families and staff.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Aylward GP, Hatcher RP, Stripp B, Gustafson NF, Leavitt LA. Who goes and who stays: subject loss in a multicenter, longitudinal follow-up study. J Dev Behav Pediatr1985; 6: 3–8.
2.
2. Bender BG, Ellison MC, Gleason M, Murphy JR, Sundstrom DA, Szefler SJ. Minimizing attrition in a long-term clinical trial of pediatric asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol2003; 91: 168–176.
3.
3. Janus M, Goldberg S. Factors influencing family participation in a longitudinal study: comparison of pediatric and healthy samples. J Pediatr Psychol1997; 22: 245–262.
4.
4. Moser DK, Dracup K, Doering LV. Factors differentiating dropouts from completers in a longitudinal, multicenter clinical trial. Nurs Res2000; 49: 109–116.
5.
5. Senturia YD, McNiff Mortimer K, Baker D et al.Successful techniques for retention of study participants in an inner-city population. Control Clin Trials1998; 19: 544–554.
6.
6. Given BA, Keilman LJ, Collins C, Given CW.Strategies to minimize attrition in longitudinal studies. Nurs Res1990; 39: 184–186.
7.
7. Goldman AL, Holcomb R, Perry HM, Schnaper HW, Fitz AE, Frohlich ED. Can dropout and other noncompliance be minimized in a clinical trial?Control Clin Trials1982; 3: 75–89.
8.
8. Janson SL, Alioto ME, Boushey HA. Attrition and retention of ethnically diverse subjects in a multicenter randomized controlled research trial. Control Clin Trials2001; 22: 236S–243S.
9.
9. Orr PR, Blackhurst DW, Hawkins BS. Patient and clinic factors predictive of missed visits and inactive status in a multicenter clinical trial. The Macular Photo coagulation Study Group. Control Clin Trials1992; 13: 40–49.
10.
10. Marmor JK, Oliveria SA, Donahue RP et al. Factors encouraging cohort maintenance in a longitudinal study. J Clin Epidemiol1991; 44: 531–535.
11.
11. Hyman L, Gwiazda J, Marsh-Tootle WL, Norton TT, Hussein M, the COMET Group. The Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET): design and general baseline characteristics. Control Clin Trials2001; 22: 573–592.
12.
12. Gwiazda J, Hyman L, Hussein M et al. A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses versus single vision lenses on the progression of myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2003; 44: 1492–1500.
13.
13. Tversky A, Kahneman D.Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science1974; 185: 1124-1131.
14.
14. Bender BG, Ikle DN, DuHamel T, Tinkelman D.Retention of asthmatic patients in a longitudinal clinical trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol1997; 99: 197–203.
