Verification of program accuracy for illuminance modelling: assumptions,methodology and an examination of conflicting findings

Abstract

,!This paper examines the role of assumptions commonly made in validation studies for lighting simulation programs and quantifies the sensitivity of results to uncertainties in key model parameters such as sky conditions and surface reflectivity. Actually occurring overcast skies are often taken to approximate the CIE standard overcast sky for the purpose of comparing predictions against measurements in real buildings. The validity of this assumption is tested against measurements of the sky luminance distribution for real skies. Illuminance predictions are particularly sensitive to the assigned reflectance of surfaces when the direct component of illumination is small. A number of confounding factors that can lead to imprecise estimates of surface reflectivity for building facades are identified and a methodology to minimize their effect is proposed. This study reveals that commonly made assumptions with respect to sky conditions and moderate imprecision in model parameters can lead to erroneous assessments of program accuracy. The degree to which existing validation findings can be extrapolated to very different application scenarios is discussed in the context of reported conflicting assessments of program accuracy.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ward Larson G , Shakespeare R. Rendering with radiance: the art and science of lighting visualization. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 1998.

Grynberg A. Validation of radiance, LBID 1575, LBL Technical Information Department, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California, July 1989.

Mardaljevic J. Validation of a lighting simulation program under real sky conditions. Lighting Res. Technol. 1995; 27: 181-188.

Rushmeier, HE Ward G , Piatko C , Sanders P , Rust B. Comparing real and synthetic images: some ideas about metrics: proceedings of the Sixth Eurographics Rendering Workshop, revised version in Hanrahan and Purgathofer , editors. Rendering Techniques 1995, Springer 1995.

Khodulev AB , Kopylov EA. Physically accurate lighting simulation in computer graphics software: Proceedings GraphiCon 96: The 6th International Conference on Computer graphics and Visualization. St. Petersburg, Russia, 1-5 July, 1996: Vol. 2, 111-119.

Mardaljevic J. Validation of lighting simulation program: a study using measured sky brightness distributions. LuxEuropa 97 proc. 555-569, Amsterdam, 1997.

McNamara A , Chalmers A , Troscianko T , Gilchrist I. Comparing real and synthetic scenes using human judgements of lightness. In Piroche B , Rusheier H , editors. Proceedings of the eurographics workshop in Brno. Eurographics, June 2000. Comparing Real and Synthetic Scenes using Human Judgements of Lightness, EGWR 2000, Brno.

Mardaljevic J. Daylight simulation: validation, sky models and daylight coefficients PhD thesis. Leicester: De Montfort University 2000.

Mardaljevic J. The BRE-IDMP dataset: a new benchmark for the validation of illuminance prediction techniques. Lighting Res. Technol. 2001; 33-33.

10.

Cannon-Brooks SWA . Simple scal models for daylighting design: analysis of sources of error in illuminance predicting. Lighting Res. Technol. 1997; 29: 135-142.

11.

Bellia L , Cesarano A , Sibilio S. Daylight contribution of interior lighting: experimental verification of software simulation results. Lighting Res. Technol. 1994; 26: 99-105.

12.

Ng E. A study on the accuracy of daylight simulation of heavily obstructed buildings in Hong Kong. International Building Performance Simulation Association Conference, Brazil, 2001.

13.

Galasiu A , Atif MR. Applicability of daylight computer, modeling in real case studies: comparison between measured and simulated daylight availability and lighting consumption. Building and Environment. 2002; 37: 363-377.

14.

Hopkinson RG , Petherbridge P , Longmore J. Daylight. Londari Heinneman, 1966.

15.

Enarun D , Littlefair P. Luminance models for overcast skies: assessment using measured data. Lighting Res. Technol. 1995; 27: 53-58.

16.

Aizlewood ME. Innovative daylight systems: An experimental evaluation. Lighting Res. Technol. 1993; 24: 141-152.

17.

Mardaljevic J. Daylight simulation. In Ward Larson G , Shakespeare R , editors. Rendering with radiance: the art and science of lighting visualization. San Francisco: Morgan-Kaufmann, 1998: Chapter 6, 341-390.