The purpose of this paper is to propose an alternative log-linear representation of
an adjacent categories (AC) paired comparison (PC) model. The AC model is well
suited for modelling ordinal PC data by postulating a power relationship between the
response category and the probability of preferring one object over another object.
The model is applied to data collected on the motivation of Vienna students to start
a doctoral programme of study.
Agresti A
(1990) Categorical data analysis.
John Wiley, New York
.
2.
Agresti A
(1992)
Analysis of ordinal paired comparison data
. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics)41,
287-297
.
3.
Aitkin M
,
Anderson D
,
Francis B
, and
Hinde J
(1989) Statistical modelling in GLIM.
Clarendon Press: Oxford
.
4.
Böckenholt U
(1988)
A logistic representation of multivariate paired-comparison models
. Journal of Mathematical Psychology32,
44-63
.
5.
Böckenholt U
and
Dillon W
(1997)
Modelling within-subject dependencies in ordinal paired comparison data
. Psychometrika62,
411-434
.
6.
Bradley RA
and
Terry ME
(1952)
Rank analysis of incomplete block designs I. The method of paired comparisons
. Biometrika39,
324-345
.
7.
David HA
(1988) The method of paired comparisons.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
8.
Davidson RR
(1970)
Extending the Bradley-Terry model to accommodate ties in paired comparison experiments
. Journal of the American Statistical Association,
65,
317-328
.
9.
Davidson RR
and
Beaver RJ
(1977)
On extending the Bradley-Terry model to incorporate within-pair order effects
. Biometrics, 33,
693-702
.
10.
Dittrich R
,
Hatzinger R
and
Katzenbeisser W
(1997).
Fitting paired comparison models in GLIM: (I) simple models, ties and
position effects
. GLIM-Newsletter27,
27-34
.
11.
Dittrich R
,
Hatzinger R
and
Katzenbeisser W
(1998a)
Modelling the effect of subject-specific covariates in paired comparison
studies with an application to university rankings
. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied
Statistics), 47,
511-525
.
12.
Dittrich R
,
Hatzinger R
and
Katzenbeisser W
(1998b)
Fitting paired comparison models in GLIM: (II) subject and object variables
. GLIM-Newsletter, 28,
21-28
.
13.
Francis B
,
Dittrich R
,
Hatzinger R
and
Penn R
(2002)
Analysing partial ranks by using smoothed paired comparison methods: an
investigation of value orientation in Europe
. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied
Statistics), 51,
319-336
.
14.
Francis B
,
Green M
,
Payne C
(Eds.) (1993) The GLIM system: release 4 manual.
Oxford: Clarendon Press
.
15.
Gilchrist R
and
Green P
(1993) The Theory of generalised linear models.
In
Francis, B.
,
Green M
,
Payne C
(Eds.) The GLIM system: release 4 Manual.
Oxford: Clarendon Press
.
16.
Matthews JNS
and
Morris KP
(1995)
An application of Bradley-Terry-type models to the measurement of pain
. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied
Statistics), 44,
243-255
.
17.
Payne C
(1979)
A macro for calculating the correct degrees of freedom for a log-linear
model of a contingency table
. GLIM-Newsletter, 1,
32-33
.
18.
Rao PV
and
Kupper LL
(1967)
Ties in paired comparisons: a generalization of the Bradley-Terry model
. Journal of the American Statistical Association,
62,
194-204
.
19.
Proceedings of the International Conference on Generalised Linear Models,
Springer Lecture Notes in Statistics, 14,
164-178
;
New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer
.
