Facilitating follow-up in ELT INSET

Abstract

There is evidence that ELT INSET does not always result in the desired level of ‘follow-up’, i.e. impact on teachers’ classroom practices. Nevertheless, little research appears to have been carried out concerning how the design of INSET systems affects such outcomes. This paper therefore attempts to throw light on some of the factors involved, using data derived from research into the operation of the Philippines English Language Teaching (PELT) Project INSET system. In order to attempt to facilitate follow-up, this programme took the form of a hybrid, joint course- and school-based model. Trainees’ views on the functioning of the model were elicited via questionnaires and structured discussions. The findings show that the following variables are among those which are important in determining how effectively such an INSET system operates: 1) the nature of its course- based component; 2) the interface between trainees, trainers and school- based ‘ELT managers’; and 3) the form of school-based follow-up activity employed. The data also indicates how these elements might be configured so as to optimize the potential for INSET follow-up to occur.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allwright, R. L. 1992: Understanding classroom language learning and teaching: an argument for an ‘exploratory’ approach. CRILE Working Paper 14. Centre for Research in Language Education, Lancaster University .

Bell, B. and Gilbert, J. 1996: Teacher development. Falmer Press .

Breen, M. , Candlin, C. N. , Dam, L. and Gabrielsen, G. 1989: The evolution of a teacher training programme. In Johnson, R. K. , editor, The second language curriculum. Cambridge University Press , 111-135.

Calderhead, J. , editor, 1987: Exploring teachers’ thinking. Cassell .

Elliott, J. 1986: How do teachers learn? In Hopkins, D. , editor, Inservice training and educational development: an international survey. Croom Helm , 138-145.

Elliott, J. 1991: Action research for educational change. Open University Press .

Eraut, M. 1994: Developing professional knowledge and competence. Falmer Press .

Flowerdew, J. , Brock, M. and Hsia, S. , editors, 1992: Perspectives on second language teacher education. City Polytechnic of Hong Kong .

Freeman, D. 1989: Teacher training, development and decision making: a model of teaching and related strategies for language teacher education . TESOL Quarterly 23(1): 27-45 .

10.

Freeman, D. and Richards, J. C. , editors, 1996: Teacher learning in language teaching. Cambridge University Press .

11.

Fullan, M. with Stiegelbauer, S. 1991: The new meaning of educational change, second edition. Cassell .

12.

Fullan, M. 2001: The new meaning of educational change, third edition. RoutledgeFalmer .

13.

Hayes, D. , editor, 1997: In-service teacher development: international perspectives. Prentice Hall .

14.

Hayes, D. 2000: Cascade training and teachers’ professional development . ELT Journal 54(2): 135-145 .

15.

Holliday, A. 1990: A role for soft systems methodology in ELT projects . System 18(1): 175-183 .

16.

Hopkins, D. 1985: A teacher’s guide to classroom research. Open University Press .

17.

Hopkins, D. 1986: Inservice and educational development. In Hopkins, D. , editor, Inservice training and educational development: an international survey. Croom Helm , 1-13.

18.

Joyce, B. 1992: Cooperative learning and staff development: teaching the method with the method . Cooperative Learning 12(2): 10-13 .

19.

Joyce, B. and Showers, B. 1980: Improving in-service training: the messages of research . Educational Leadership 37(5): 379-385 .

20.

Joyce, B. and Showers, B. 1984: Transfer of training: the contribution of coaching. In Hopkins and Wideen , editors, Alternative perspectives on school improvement. Falmer Press , 77-88.

21.

Joyce, B. and Showers, B. 1988: Student achievement through staff development. Longman .

22.

Kennedy, C. 1987: Innovating for a change . ELT Journal 41(3): 163-170 .

23.

Kennedy, C. 1988: Evaluation of the management of change in ELT projects . Applied Linguistics 9(4): 329-342 .

24.

Kinder, K. , Harland, J. and Wootten, E. 1991: The impact of school-focused INSET on classroom practice. National Foundation for Educational Research .

25.

Lamb, M. 1995: The consequences of INSET . ELT Journal 49(1): 72-80 .

26.

Medgyes, P. and Malderez, A. , editors, 1996: Changing perspectives in teacher education. Heinemann .

27.

Moon, J. and Boullón, L. 1997: Reluctance to reflect: issues in professional development. In Hayes, D. , editor, In-service teacher development: international perspectives. Prentice Hall , 60-73.

28.

Nunan, D. 1990: Action research in the language classroom. In Richards, J. C. and Nunan, D. , editors, 1990: Second language teacher education. Cambridge University Press , 62-81.

29.

O’Brien, T. 1981: The E-R-O-T-I Model: a stimulating guide for teacher training. In ELT Documents 110 - Focus on the teacher. The British Council , 54-63.

30.

Oldroyd, D. and Hall, V. 1991: Managing staff development. Paul Chapman .

31.

Palmer, C. 1993: Innovation and the experienced teacher . ELT Journal 47(2): 166-171 .

32.

Prabhu, N. S. 1990: There is no best method - why ? TESOL Quarterly 24(2): 161-176 .

33.

Ramani, E. 1987: Theorizing from the classroom . ELT Journal 41(1): 3-11 .

34.

Richards, J. C. 1998: Beyond training. Cambridge University Press .

35.

Richards, J. C. and Lockhart, C. 1994: Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge University Press .

36.

Richards, J. C. and Nunan, D. , editors, 1990: Second language teacher education. Cambridge University Press .

37.

Roberts, J. 1998: Language teacher education. Arnold .

38.

Rogers, E. M. 1995: The diffusion of innovations, fourth edition. Macmillan/Free Press .

39.

Rudduck, J. 1981: Making the most of the short in-service course. Schools Council Working Paper 71. Methuen Educational .

40.

Thorne, C. and Qiang, Q. 1996: Action research in language teacher education . ELT Journal 50(3): 254-262 .

41.

Tomlinson, B. 1988: In-service TEFL: is it worth the risk ? The Teacher Trainer 2(2): 17-19 .

42.

Wallace, M. J. 1991: Training foreign language teachers. Cambridge University Press .

43.

Wallace, M. J. 1998: Action research for language teachers. Cambridge University Press .

44.

Waters, A. 2001: In-service teacher learning in ELT projects and programmes: an integrated approach. PhD thesis, University of Lancaster.

45.

Waters, A. and Vilches, M. L. C. 1998: Foundation-building and potential-realizing: the PELT ELT paradigm (or: the learning cake) . The ACELT Journal 2(1): 3-11 (also available at: http://bowland-files.lancs.ac.uk/staff/alan/IELE%2520WWW%2520pages/nfpeltpara.htm).

46.

Waters, A. and Vilches, M. L. C. 2000: Integrating teacher learning: the school-based follow-up development activity . ELT Journal 54(2): 126-134 .

47.

White, R. 1988: The ELT curriculum. Basil Blackwell .

48.

Woods, D. 1996: Teacher cognition in language teaching. Cambridge University Press .