Presenting a model of change

Abstract

The literature surrounding the process of curriculum innovation and change abounds with the assumption that change is a difficult, often painful and hugely complex process. It involves educational, political, national, institutional and personal issues. It challenges the very fabric of our society, and our roles not only as professionals, but as people. This article introduces a model of change developed during a research study of Japanese teachers of English taking part in an overseas teacher-training programme designed to support a major curriculum innovation. The research investigated the influence of the programme, and examined a group of teachers, analysing their changes in attitude, perceived methodology and practice before and after the in-service period. The findings demonstrated that in all cases changes towards the aims of the innovation had taken place. In the wider context, an analysis of the process of change indicated that there may be a number of interconnected areas that affect individual actions. This resulted in the development of a model of change. The paper will set this new model into its theoretical context by referring to established models and highlight a number of critical features that were shown to have an impact on the process of change.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen, I. 1988: Attitudes, personality and behaviour. Milton Keynes: Open University Press .

Alderson, J. C. and Wall, D. 1993: Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics 14(2): 115-129 .

Allwright, D. 1999: Processes of language teacher education . Plenary paper given at the International Conference on Language Teacher Education, University of Minnesota.

Allwright, D. 2000: Exploratory practice . Plenary paper given at the 8th IALS Symposium for Language Teacher Educators, Edinburgh, UK.

Breen, M. 1985: The social context for language learning . Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7: 135-158 .

Canale, M. and Swain, M. 1980: Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing . Applied Linguistics 1(1): 1-47 .

Carless, D. R. 1999: Large-scale curriculum change in Hong Kong. In Kennedy, C. , Doyle, P. and Goh, C. , editors, Exploring change in English language teaching. Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann English Language Teaching , 19-29.

Cheng, L. 1999: Changing assessment . Teaching and Teacher Education 15(3): 253-271 .

Easen, P. 1985: Making school-centred INSET work. London: Croom Helm .

10.

Edwards, C. 1996: Learning to learn how to teach. In Willis, J. and Willis, D. , editors, Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann , 99-107.

11.

Fullan, M. G. 1991: The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell .

12.

Goh, C. 1999: Nationwide curriculum innovation: how do we manage change? In Kennedy, C. , Doyle, P. and Goh, C. , editors, Exploring change in English language teaching. Oxford: Macmillan Heine-mann English Language Teaching , 5-19.

13.

Gorsuch, G. 2001: Japanese EFL teachers’ perceptions of communicative, audiolingual and Yakudoku activities: the plan versus the reality . Education Policy Analysis Archives 9(10): 1-25 .

14.

Hadley, G. 1999: Innovative curricula in tertiary ELT: a Japanese case study . The Japanese Learner, 19 October: 2-11 .

15.

Havelock, R. G. 1971: The utilization of educational research and development . British Journal of Educational Technology 2: 84-97 .

16.

Henrichsen, L. E. 1989: Diffusion of innovation in English language teaching: the ELEC effort in Japan, 1956-1968. New York: Greenwood Press .

17.

Hofstede, G. 1991: Cultures and organisations. London: McGraw-Hill .

18.

Holliday, A. 1994: Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

19.

Holliday, A. 1999: Small cultures . Applied Linguistics, 20(2): 237-264 .

20.

Huberman, M. and Miles, M. 1984: Innovation up close. New York: Plenum .

21.

Hull, W. , Kester, R. and Martin, W. 1973: A conceptual framework for the diffusion of innovation. Ohio: Ohio State University Press .

22.

Johnson, J. 2002: Japanese education and teacher training in transition . Explorations in Teacher Education 10(2): 1-7 .

23.

Karavas-Doukas, E. 1996: Using attitude scales to investigate teachers’ attitudes to the communicative approach . ELT Journal 50(3): 187-198 .

24.

Kennedy, C. 1990: Evaluation of the management of change in ELT projects . Applied Linguistics 9(4): 329-342 .

25.

Kennedy, D. 1999: The foreign trainer as change agent and implications for teacher education programmes in China. In Kennedy, C. , Doyle, P. and Goh, C. , editors, Exploring change in English language teaching. Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann English Language Teaching , 29-37.

26.

Kennedy, C. and Kennedy, J. 1998: Levels, linkages and networks in cross-cultural innovation . System 26: 455-469 .

27.

Kramsch, C. and Sullivan, P. 1996: Appropriate pedagogy . English Language Teaching Journal 50(3): 199-212 .

28.

Lamie, J. M. 2000: Teachers of English in Japan: professional development and training at a crossroads . JALT Journal 22(1): 27-46 .

29.

Li, D. 2001: Teachers’ perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. In Hall, D. and Hewings, A. , editors, Innovation in English language teaching. London: Routledge , 149-169.

30.

LoCastro, V. 1996: English Language Education in Japan. In Coleman, H. , editor, Society and the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 40-58.

31.

MacDonald, B. 1991: Introduction. In Rudduck, J., Innovation and change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press , 1-7.

32.

Markee, N. 1997: Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

33.

McGraw, P. 1999: Life strategies. London: Vermillion .

34.

Miyamoto, Y. 1995: A Japanese secondary teachers’ programme project report, March 1995.

35.

Monbusho 1986: English reform conference papers. Tokyo: Ministry of Education .

36.

Monbusho 1994: Handbook for team-teaching. Tokyo: Gyosei Corporation .

37.

Monbusho 1995: Japanese Government policies in education, science and culture 1994. Tokyo: Ministry of Education .

38.

Pinar, K. 1999: Introducing new course materials. In Kennedy, C. , Dayle, P. and Goh, C. , editors, Exploring change in English language teaching. Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann English Language Teaching .

39.

Rausch, A. 2000: Improvement in English language education from a learning perspective . Language Teacher Online. <http://jaltpublications.org/tlt/les/00/jun/rausch.html>, accessed February 2001.

40.

Richards, J. C. 1998: Beyond training. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

41.

Richards, J. C. and Rodgers, T. S. 1986: Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

42.

Rogers, E. and Everett, M. 1971: Communication of innovation: a cross-cultural approach. London: Collier-Macmillan .

43.

Rudduck, J. 1991: Innovation and change. Milton Keynes: Open University .

44.

Wideen, M. F. 1992: School-based teacher development. In Fullan, M. and Hargreaves, A. , editors, Teacher development and educational change. London: Falmer , 123-155.

45.

Williams, M. and Burden, R. L. 1997: Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

46.

Young, R. and Lee, S. 1984: EFL Curriculum Innovation and Teachers’ Attitudes. In Larson, P., On TESOL `84. New York: TESOL , 184-194.