Abstract
In recent years Terence Zuber has maintained that the document commonly known as the âSchlieffen Planâ was, in fact, no real war plan. This article takes issue with Zuberâs far-ranging conclusions. It examines his use of sources, places German war planning in its wider political context, and considers evidence overlooked by Zuber. It demonstrates how a fundamental shift occurred in Germanyâs strategic situation in 1905 and how this shift led to change in Germanyâs war plans. Schlieffenâs 1905 memorandum took account of this strategic change and allowed Schlieffen at last to place at the heart of his war plan ideas he had been developing since the 1890s. Although modifications were made to meet changes in Germanyâs strategic situation, this memorandum served as the basis for all German war plans before 1914. Thus, Schlieffen deserves to be remembered as the father of Germanyâs war plan, with all its strengths and weaknesses, in 1914.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
