Bailer AJ , Oris JT . Estimating inhibition concentrations for different response scales using generalized linear models . Environ Toxicol Chem1997; 16: 1554–1559 .
2.
Bartell SM . Are ecosystems hormetic?Hum Ecol Risk Assess2000; 6: 237–243 .
3.
Calabrese EJ , Baldwin LA . The dose determines the stimulation (and poison): development of a chemical hormesis database . Int J of Toxicol1997; 16: 545–559 .
4.
Calabrese EJ , Baldwin LA . History of chemical hormesis . Hum Exp Toxicol2000; 19: 2–31 .
5.
Caswell H . Matrix population models, 2nd edition. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates , 2000.
6.
Chapman PM . New and emerging issues in ecotoxicology — the shape of testing to come?Australas J Ecotoxicol1998; 4: 1–7 .
7.
Chapman PM . Whole effluent toxicity testing — usefulness, level of protection, and risk assessment . Environ Toxicol Chem1999; 19: 3–13 .
8.
Chapman PM. Integrating toxicology and benthic ecology: putting the eco back into ecotoxicology. Mar Pollut Bull 2001 (in press).
9.
Collins SL , Glenn SM , Gibson DJ . Experimental analysis of intermediate disturbance and initial floristic composition: decoupling cause and effect . Ecology1995; 76: 486–492 .
10.
Gentile JH , van der Schalie WH . Hormesis and ecological risk assessment: fact or fantasy?Hum Ecol Risk Assess2000; 6: 227–236 .
11.
Kerr DR , Meador JP . Modelling dose response using generalized linear models . Environ Toxicol Chem1996; 15: 395–401 .
12.
Stebbing ARD . Maia hypothesis — growth control and toxicology . Hum Ecol Risk Assess2000; 6: 301–311 .
13.
Stebbing ARD . A theory for growth hormesis . Mutat Res1998; 403: 249–258 .
14.
Suter GW II . Ecological risk assessment. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers , 1993.
15.
Tansley AG , Adamson RS . Studies on the vegetation of the English chalk: III. The chalk grasslands of the Hampshire–Sussex border . J Ecol1925; 13: 177–223 .
16.
Van Ewijk PH , Hoekstra JA . Calculation of the EC50 and its confidence interval when subtoxic stimulus is present . Ecotoxicol Environ Saf1993; 25: 25–32 .
