Anderson, M. J. and Gribble, N. A.1998: Partitioning the variation among spatial, temporal and environmental components in a multivariate dataset. Australian Journal of Ecology23, 158-167.
2.
Anderson, M. J. and Willis, T. J.2003: Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology84, 511-525.
3.
Beals E. W.1984: Bray-Curtis ordination: an effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data. Advances in Ecological Research14, 1-55.
4.
Belbin, L. and McDonald, C.1993: Comparing three classification strategies for use in ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science4, 341-348.
5.
Bezdek, J. C.1974: Numerical taxonomy with fuzzy sets. Journal of Mathematical Biology1, 57-71.
6.
Bezdek, J. C.1981: Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. New York: Plenum Press.
7.
Borcard, D. and Legendre, P.1994: Environmental control and spatial structure in ecological communities: an example using orbatid mites (Acari, Oribatei). Environmental and Ecological Statistics1, 37-53.
8.
Borcard, D. and Legendre, P.2002: All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates on neighbour matrices. Ecological Modelling153, 51-68.
9.
Borcard, D., Legendre, P., Avois-Jacquet, C. and Tuomisto, H.2004: Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales. Ecology85, 1826-1832.
10.
Borcard, D., Legendre, P. and Drapeau, P.1992: Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology73, 1045-1055.
11.
Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A. and Stone, C. J.1984: Classification and regression trees. New York: Chapman and Hall.
12.
Clarke, K. R.1993: Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology18, 117-143.
13.
Clarke, K. R. and Ainsworth, M.1993: A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables. Marine Ecology Progress Series92, 205-219.
14.
Clarke, K. R. and Gorley, R. N.2001: PRIMER v5: User Manual/Tutorial. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.
15.
Clarke, K. R. and Green, R. H.1988: Statistical design and analysis for a ‘biological effects’ study. Marine Ecology Progress Series46, 213-226.
16.
Clarke, K. R. and Warwick, R. M.1994: Similarity-based testing for community pattern: the 2-way layout with no replication. Marine Biology118, 167-176.
17.
Corney, P. M., Le Duc, M. G., Smart, S. M., Kirby, K. J., Bunce, R. G. H. and Marrs, R. H.2004: The effect of landscape-scale environmental drivers on the vegetation composition of British woodlands. Biological Conservation120, 491-505.
18.
Couteron, P. and Ollier, S.2005: A generalized, variogram-based framework for multi-scale ordination. Ecology86, 828-834.
19.
Cox, T. F. and Cox, M. A. A.1996: Multidimensional scaling. London: Chapman and Hall.
20.
Cushman, S. A. and McGarigal, K.2003: Hierarchical, multi-scale decomposition of species-environment relationships. Landscape Ecology17, 637-646.
21.
Cushman, S. A. and Wallin, D. O.2002: Separating the effects of environmental, spatial and disturbance factors on forest community structure in the Russian Far East. Forest Ecology and Management168, 201-215.
22.
Dale, M. R. T. and Fortin, M.-J.2002: Spatial autocorrelation and statistical tests in ecology. Ecoscience9, 162-167.
23.
Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., Bini, L. M. and Hawkins, B.2003: Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology. Global Ecology and Biogeography12, 53-64.
24.
Dolédec, S. and Chessel, D.1994: Co-inertia analysis: an alternative method for studying species-environment relationships. Freshwater Biology31, 277-294.
25.
Dray, S., Chessel, D. and Thioulouse, J.2004: Co-inertia analysis and the linking of ecological data tables. Ecology84, 3078-3089.
26.
Equihua, M.1991: Fuzzy clustering of ecological data. Journal of Ecology78, 519-534.
27.
Everitt, B. S., Landau, S. and Leese, M.2001: Cluster analysis (fourth edition). London: Arnold.
28.
Faith, D. P., Minchin, P. R. and Belbin, L.1987: Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio69, 57-68.
29.
Fortin, M.-J. and Dale, M.2005: Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Fortin, M.-J. and Gurevitch, J.2001: Mantel tests: spatial structure in field experiments. In Scheiner, S. M. and Gurevitch, J., editors, Design and analysis of ecological experiments (second edition), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 308-326.
31.
Gauch, H. G.1982: Multivariate analysis for community ecology. New York, Cambridge University Press.
32.
Gittins, R.1969: The application of ordination techniques. In Rorison, I. H., editor, Ecological aspects of the mineral nutrition of plants, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 37-66.
33.
Goodall, D. W.2002: Probabilistic classification and its application to vegetation science. Community Ecology3, 147-157.
34.
Graham, M. H.2003: Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology84, 2809-2815.
Hájek, M., Hekera, P. and Hájková, P.2002: Spring fen vegetation and water chemistry in the Western Carpathien flysch zone. Folia Geobotanica37, 205-224.
37.
Hervada-Sala, C. and Jarauta-Bragulat, E.2004: A program to perform Ward’s clustering method on several regionalised variables. Computers and Geosciences30, 881-886.
38.
Hill, M. O.1979a: TWINSPAN - a FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two way table by classification of the individuals and the attributes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Department of Ecology and Systematics.
39.
Hill, M. O.1979b: DECORANA - a FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Department of Ecology and Systematics.
40.
Hill, M.O. and Šmilauer, P. 2005: TWINSPAN for Windows version 2.3. Huntingdon and České Budějovice, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology and University of South Bohemia.
41.
Jackson, D. A. and Somers, K. M.1991: Putting things in order: the ups and downs of detrended correspondence analysis. The American Naturalist117, 704-712.
42.
Jetz, W., Rahbek, C. and Lichstein, J. W.2005: Local and global approaches to spatial data analysis in ecology. Global Ecology and Biogeography14, 97-98.
43.
Jiménez-Gonzáles, S.1999: Agrupación de datos con dependencia especial. El método de Ward adapto y la estimación iterative de semivariograms (Clustering of spatially dependent data. Adapted Ward’s method and iterative variogram estimation). Final Engineering Project, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, 151-151 pp.
44.
Jiménez-Gonzáles, S., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Egozcue, J. J. and Ramirez-Llorente, R. 1998: Ward’s method adapted to spatially dependent data. In Proceedings of the Fourth Meeting of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, Barcelona, Spain, 445-450.
45.
Johnson, K. W. and Altman, N. S.1999: Canonical correspondence analysis as an approximation to Gaussian ordination. Environmetrics10, 39-52.
46.
Jongman, R. H. G., ter Braak, C. J. G. and van Tongeren, O. F. R.1995: Data analysis in community and landscape ecology (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Kent, M. and Ballard, J.1988: Trends and problems in the application of classification and ordination methods in plant ecology. Vegetatio78, 109-124.
48.
Kent, M. and Coker, P.1992: Vegetation description and analysis a practical approach. Chichester: Wiley.
49.
Kent, M., Moyeed, R. A., Reid, C. L., Pakeman, R. and Weaver, R.2006: Geostatistics, spatial rate of change analysis and boundary detection in plant ecology and biogeography. Progress in Physical Geography30, 201-231.
50.
Kershaw, K. A.1973: Quantitative and dynamic plant ecology. London: Arnold.
51.
Kershaw, K. A. and Looney, J. H. H.1985: Quantitative and dynamic plant ecology (third edition). London: Arnold.
52.
Kruskal, J. B.1964a: Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika29, 1-27.
53.
Kruskal, J. B.1964b: Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika29, 115-129.
54.
Lee, P. Y. and Rotenberry, J. T.2005: Relationships between bird species and tree species assemblages in forested habitats of eastern North America. Journal of Biogeography32, 1139-1150.
55.
Legendre, P.1993: Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm?Ecology74, 1659-1673.
56.
Legendre, P. and Legendre, L.1998: Numerical ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
57.
Legendre, P., Dale, M. R. T., Fortin, M.-J., Gurevitch, J., Hohn, M. and Myers, D.2002: The consequences of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveys. Ecography25, 601-615.
58.
Lennon, J. J.2000: Red-shifts and red herrings in geographical ecology. Ecography23, 101-113.
59.
Lepš, J. and Šmilauer, P.2003: Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Makarenkov, V. and Legendre, P.2002: Nonlinear redundancy analysis and canonical correspondence analysis based on polynomial regression. Ecology83, 1146-1161.
61.
McArdle, B. H. and Anderson, M. J.2001: Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology82, 290-297.
62.
McCune, B.2004: Nonparametric multiplicative regression for habitat modeling. Retrieved 1 October 2005 from http://www.pcord.com/NPMRintro.pdf
63.
McCune, B. and Grace, J. B.2002: Analysis of ecological communities. Gleneden Beach, OR: MjM Software.
64.
McCune, B. and Mefford, M. J.1999: PC-ORD, Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 4. Gleneden Beach, OR: MjM Software.
65.
McCune, B. and Mefford, M. J.2004: Nonparametric multiplicative habitat modelling, version 1.0. Gleneden Beach, OR: MjM Software.
66.
Méot, A., Legendre, P. and Borcard, D.1998: Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variations: questions and propositions in the linear modelling framework. Environmental and Ecological Statistics5, 1-27.
67.
Mielke, P. W. Jr, Berry, K. J. and Brier, G. W.1981: Application of multi-response permutation procedures for examining seasonal changes in monthly sea-level pressure patterns. Monthly Weather Review109, 120-126.
68.
Mielke, P. W. Jr, Berry, K. J. and Johnson, E. S.1976: Multiresponse permutation procedures for a priori classifications. Communications in StatisticsA5, 1409-1424.
69.
Millar, R. B., Anderson, M. J. and Zunun, G.2005: Fitting nonlinear environmental gradients to community data: a general distance-based approach. Ecology86, 2245-2251.
70.
Minchin, P. R.1987: Simulation of multidimensional community patterns: towards a comprehensive model. Vegetatio71, 145-156.
71.
Økland, R. H.1996: Are ordination and constrained ordination alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies?Journal of Vegetation Science7, 289-292.
72.
Økland, R. H. and Eilertsen, O.1994: Canonical correspondence analysis with variance partitioning: some comments and an application. Journal of Vegetation Science5, 117-126.
73.
Oksanen, J. and Minchin, P. R.1997: Instability of ordination results under changes in input data order: explanations and remedies. Journal of Vegetation Science8, 447-454.
74.
Palmer, M. W.1993: Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology74, 2215-2230.
75.
Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Simarro-Grande, G. and Martin-Fernandez, J. A. 1997: Spatial cluster analysis using a generalised Mahalanobis distance. In Proceedings of the Third Meeting of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, Barcelona, Spain, 175-180.
76.
Pisces Conservation Ltd. 2004: Fuzzy grouping for clustering objects while accounting for uncertainty. Lymington: Pisces Conservation Ltd(www.piscesconservation.com).
77.
Quinn, G. P. and Keough, M. J.2002: Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78.
Roberts, D. W.1989: Fuzzy-systems vegetation theory. Vegetatio83, 71-80.
79.
Rogerson, P. A.2005: A set of associated statistical tests for spatial clustering. Environmental and Ecological Statistics12, 275-288.
80.
Scull, P., Franklin, J. and Chadwick, O. A.2004: The application of classification tree analysis to soil type prediction in a desert landscape. Ecological Modelling181, 1-15.
81.
Shepard, R. N.1962: The analysis of proximities: multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. Psychometrika27, 125-139, 219-246.
82.
Svenning, J. C., Kinner, D. A., Stallard, R. F., Engelbrecht, B. M. J. and Wright, S. J.2004: Ecological determinism in plant community structure across a tropical forest landscape. Ecology85, 2526-2538.
83.
Tausch, R. J., Charlet, D. A., Weixelman, D. A. and Zamudio, D. C.1995: Patterns of ordination and classification instability resulting from changes in input order. Journal of Vegetation Science6, 897-902.
84.
Telford, R. J. and Birks, H. J. B.2005: The secret assumption of transfer functions: problems with spatial autocorrelation in evaluating model performance. Quaternary Science Reviews24, 2173-2179.
85.
ter Braak, C. J. F.1986: Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology67, 1167-1179.
86.
ter Braak, C. J. F.1987: The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio69, 69-77.
87.
ter Braak, C. J. F.1988a: CANOCO - an extension of DECORANA to analyse species-environmental relationships. Vegetatio75, 150-160.
88.
ter Braak, C. J. F.1988b: Partial canonical correspondence analysis. In Block, H. H., editor, Classification and related methods of data analysis, Amsterdam: North Holland Press, 551-558.
89.
ter Braak, C. J. F. and Schaffers, A. P.2004: Co-correspondence analysis: a new ordination method to relate two community compositions. Ecology85, 834-846.
90.
ter Braak, C. J. F. and Šmilauer, P.2003: CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide to Canoco for Windows: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Ithaca, NY: Microcomputer Power.
91.
ter Braak, C. J. F., Hoijtink, H., Akkermans, W. and Verdonschot, P. F.2003: Bayesian model-based cluster analysis for predicting macrofaunal communities. Ecological Modelling160, 235-248
92.
Titeux, N., Dufrêne, M., Jacob, J.-P., Paquay, M. and Defourny, P.2004: Multivariate analysis of a fine-scale breeding bird atlas using a geographic information system and partial correspondence analysis: environmental and spatial effects. Journal of Biogeography31, 1841-1856.
93.
Urban, D. L.2002: Classification and regression trees. In McCune, B. and Grace, J. B., editors, Analysis of ecological communities, Gleneden Beach, OR: MjM Software, Chapter 29.
94.
van Groenewoud, H.1992: The robustness of correspondence, detrended correspondence and TWINSPAN analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science3, 239-246.
95.
Vayssieres, M. P., Plant, R. E. and Allen-Diaz, B. H.2000: Classification trees: an alternative approach for predicting species distributions. Journal of Vegetation Science11, 679-694.
96.
Vayssieres, M. P., Plant, R. E. and Allen-Diaz, B. H.2003: Spatial covariance in plant communities: integrating ordination, geostatistics and variance testing. Ecology84, 1045-1057.
97.
Wagner, H. H.2004: Direct multi-scale ordination with canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology85, 342-351.
98.
Wagner, H. H. and Fortin, M.-J.2005: Spatial analysis of landscapes: concepts and statistics. Ecology86, 1975-1987.
99.
Waite, S.2000: Statistical ecology in practice: a guide to analysing environmental and ecological field data. Harlow: Pearson-Prentice-Hall.
100.
Ward, J. H.1963: Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. American Statistical Association Journal58, 236-244.
101.
Williams, W. T., Lambert, J. M. and Lance, G. N.1966: Multivariate methods in plant ecology. V. Similarity analysis and information analysis. Journal of Ecology54, 427-445.
102.
Yee, T. W.2004: A new technique for maximum-liklihood canonical Gaussian ordination. Ecological Monographs74, 685-701.
103.
Zhu, M., Hastie, T. J. and Walther, G.2005: Constrained ordination analysis with flexible response functions. Ecological Modelling187, 254-336.